The whole point of this transition is that the rebuilt library is not
compatible. So it can't provide the old name and there can't be a transitional
package.
Cheers
Julien
On August 9, 2015 8:25:46 AM CEST, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Julien,
I applied your patch and I updated
Sorry. You are right. I looked at each dependant package and no need
notify the maintainers.
Upload to unstable, closing the bug.
Regards,
Eriberto
2015-08-09 15:43 GMT-03:00 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br:
Hum... I understand but I prefer notify the maintainers.
Thanks Julien!
Hi Julien,
Ok. I will do it:
1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug.
2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up
to next Saturday.
3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug.
4. Notify all maintainers that uploaded their packages to
Hum... I understand but I prefer notify the maintainers.
Thanks Julien!
Regards,
Eriberto
2015-08-09 14:01 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
Hi Julien,
Ok. I will do it:
1. Upload to experimental, without close the
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
Hi Julien,
Ok. I will do it:
1. Upload to experimental, without close the bug.
2. Notify all maintainers of dependent packages, allowing changes up
to next Saturday.
3. In next Saturday, upload to unstable, closing the bug.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5?
Yes, something like the patch below.
... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #790975 {Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org} [src:afflib]
afflib: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared,
Control: reopen -1
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 19:33:49 +, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
afflib (3.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Upload to unstable.
* Updated all symbols. (Closes: #790975)
No, that's not how it works. You need to rename the binary package.
Cheers,
Julien
Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use v5?
Thanks!
Eriberto
2015-08-06 17:18 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
Control: reopen -1
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 19:33:49 +, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
afflib (3.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
Hi Julien,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some
symbols for ports.
Regards,
Eriberto
2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto
10 matches
Mail list logo
