Bug#791283: marked as done (siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:00:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#791283: fixed in siscone 2.0.6-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #791283, regarding siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 791283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:siscone Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: siscone Source-Version: 2.0.6-1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of siscone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 791...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastian Ramacher (supplier of updated siscone package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:24:38 +0200 Source: siscone Binary: libsiscone0v5 libsiscone-dev libsiscone-spherical0v5 libsiscone-spherical-dev siscone-examples siscone-doc-html siscone-doc-pdf Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.0.6-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Sebastian Ramacher Description: libsiscone-dev - Seedless Infrared Safe Cone jet finder - development files libsiscone-spherical-dev - Spherical version of SISCone - development files libsiscone-spherical0v5 - Spherical version of SISCone libsiscone0v5 - Seedless Infrared Safe Cone jet finder siscone-doc-html - Developer's reference manual of SISCone (HTML) siscone-doc-pdf - Developer
Bug#791283: marked as done (siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:55:11 + with message-id <8aabe0e7605b0891d89634083edd8...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#791283: siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default has caused the Debian Bug report #791283, regarding siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 791283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:siscone Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library. What is needed: - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that most likely all C++ libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can find the log for a rebuild in https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150701/ Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log. - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short explanation. - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built against these packages. - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag + transition block by 790756 reassign release.debian.org - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help to ask for feedback from other Debian developers. The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Control: severity -1 important On 2015-08-13 00:49, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed Control: severity -1 serious On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:14:17PM +, Matthias Klose wrote: - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the library. This library uses std::list and std::string in its public API. A proposed patch is available from: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/siscone/2.0.6-1ubuntu1 http://ubuntudiff.debian.net/q/package/siscone In fact, it has no reverse dependencies. So the renaming is not required. This, I am closing this bug and lowering its severity. Sorry for the noise. Regards, -- Mehdi--- End Message ---
