Processed: Re: Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #792622 [gnumach] missing licenses in debian/copyright Added tag(s) pending. -- 792622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792622 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Control: tags -1 + pending Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Sun 06 Nov 2016 21:06:48 +0200, wrote: > Here is what I have so far. It seems I never received that mail for some reason :/ > See "License: UNKNOWN-OSF" and "License: UNKNOWN-Berkeley" > for some newly found problems. Well, these

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

My inventory of the licenses in gnumach 2:1.7+git20160809-2 is not yet complete. I'm seeing two kinds of license violations so far. University of Utah advertising clause vs. GNU GPL - Several files have a license notice like this: > Copyright (c)

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Hello, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Sun 18 Sep 2016 12:57:24 +0300, wrote: > The following files are not used by "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b > -nc", i.e. their atimes do not change during this binary-arch > build, and the build succeeds even if they are removed. These shouldn't pose problem, better

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

This message applies to gnumach 2:1.7+git20160809-2. The following files are not used by "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b -nc", i.e. their atimes do not change during this binary-arch build, and the build succeeds even if they are removed. ./ChangeLog.0 ./ChangeLog.00 ./DEVELOPMENT ./ddb/db_mp.h

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Samuel Thibault writes: > It is really non-technical work, a matter of using the check-copyright > script to check that the various licences are referenced in > debian/copyright (there is no hard need to reference files exactly, > the only minimal need is knowing which

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Samuel Thibault, on Thu 02 Jun 2016 11:31:49 +0200, wrote: > It is really non-technical work, a matter of using the check-copyright > script Sorry, I meant licencecheck. Samuel

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Hello, Could somebody please really have a look? This is posing questions from ftpmaster, so we *have* to fix it. It is really non-technical work, a matter of using the check-copyright script to check that the various licences are referenced in debian/copyright (there is no hard need to

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Hello, Could somebody have a look? Thanks, Samuel Thorsten Alteholz, on Thu 16 Jul 2015 23:13:52 +0200, wrote: > Package: gnumach > Version: 2:1.5+git20150704-1 > Severity: serious > > please add all missing licenses to your debian/copyright. At least I found > files under: > MPL

Bug#792622: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Package: gnumach Version: 2:1.5+git20150704-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add all missing licenses to your debian/copyright. At least I found files under: MPL