On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 11:24:19 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
> transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
Please do the v5 transition anyway; the wider libstdc++ transition has
eaten a month so
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 15:52:58 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
> > RM bugs for bibledit-gtk and xiphos, which seem to be in the same
> > general area (bible
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:07:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 15:52:58 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
> > > RM bugs for
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 11:24:19 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
> > transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
>
> Please do the v5
On 04/09/15 15:52, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
>> RM bugs for bibledit-gtk and xiphos, which seem to be in the same
>> general area (bible study), and might get
Thanks Julien,
A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
Regards,
Daniel
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Source: sword
Version: 1.7.3+dfsg-2.1
6 matches
Mail list logo