Great - I'm glad that made sense, my email had more typos than usual
as I was in a hurry to leave the office earlier.
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've just uploaded a package featuring the patch.
>
> Thanks a lot for
Hi Peter,
I've just uploaded a package featuring the patch.
Thanks a lot for the quick and helpful response
Andreas.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
> RE: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824048
>
> I've committed this as "fix",
>
>
RE: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824048
I've committed this as "fix",
https://github.com/biopython/biopython/commit/cb5b8f7cf16dfa9aada8d3c71ab8d588ebf0693f
This was a sanity test which failed due to a change in the NCBI output.
We don't currently try to parse the plain
Hi Peter
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32:17PM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
> Thanks Andreas,
Thanks for your very quick response.
> Ah, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824048
>
> It looks like yet another minor change to the plain text human
> readable output with the latest NCBI
Hi Peter,
since some time the blastp test fails when building the Debian BioPython
package. I've got no answer what might be wrong here. Do you have any
idea which is better than deactivating this specific test for the monent
which would be the only poor idea I'd have?
Please let me know if
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:35:27PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> ...
> Bio.PDB.Selection docstring test ... ok
> ==
> FAIL: test_blastp (test_NCBI_BLAST_tools.Pairwise)
> Pairwise BLASTP search
>
6 matches
Mail list logo