Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-29 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:12:59PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser > wrote: > > With https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luajit > > showing the architectures the stand-alone luajit is not > > available for >

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-27 Thread Norbert Preining
> Well, with TL 2015.20160222 the luajittex package did still exist in > mips(el). Now, with the new version, the packages would disappear on > mips(el), which is an regression. Well, things disappear. > Make the package build on mips(el) again. ;-) That did work in the past. Maybe, but I don't

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-27 Thread Preuße
On 27.05.2016 04:21, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi, >> Some of those are official architectures, but the arm64, mips >> and mipsel failures are separate, however ppc64el and s390x > > After disabling mips and mipsel builds of lua*, now texlive-bin > is not entering testing anymore ... > >

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Norbert Preining wrote: > After disabling mips and mipsel builds of lua*, now texlive-bin > is not entering testing anymore ... > > texlive-bin is not yet built on mips: 2015.20160222.37495-1 vs > 2016.20160513.41080-2 (missing 2 binaries: libtexluajit-dev,

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-26 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi THorsten, hi all. > Justification: FTBFS on several official and debian-ports architectures Now that we have fixed this, something ele cropped up .. > Some of those are official architectures, but the arm64, mips > and mipsel failures are separate, however ppc64el and s390x After disabling

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-25 Thread Breno Leitao
On Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser wrote: > With https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=luajit > showing the architectures the stand-alone luajit is not > available for In fact we have a ppc64el patch for luajit port, but the upstream

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Norbert Preining wrote: > Thanks for testing! No problem, you’re welcome, and thanks for the quick reactions. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn)

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Norbert Preining
> Dixi quod… Thanks. > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2016.20160512-1_all.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/latex/mweights/README', > which is also in package texlive-latex-extra-doc 2015.20160320-1 Already

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Preuße
On 13.05.2016 12:21, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Moin, > But… with one exception: > > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2016.20160512-1_all.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/latex/mweights/README', > which is also

Processed: Re: Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 824166 + patch Bug #824166 [src:texlive-bin] texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 824166:

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
tags 824166 + patch thanks Dixi quod… > I’m still building, I’ll report success or failure here as soon > as it’s finished. It builds and installs and successfully creates PDFs, and I’ve uploaded it to dpo unreleased as a quickfix until you can upload. But… with one exception: dpkg: error

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Norbert Preining
That should help, will check later today, too, after my little daughter is fed and diaper changed etc etc etc Will upload later tonight. Thanks Norbert On May 13, 2016 6:21:19 PM GMT+09:00, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >Hi, > >thanks for the quick response. > >On Fri, 13

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Norbert Preining wrote: > That should help, will check later today, too, after my little > daughter is fed and diaper changed etc etc etc Sure, no problem, do that all ;-) > Will upload later tonight. I’m still building, I’ll report success or failure here as soon as

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, thanks for the quick response. On Fri, 13 May 2016, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: > ignored...or we need another switch: --disable-mfluajit added. I’ve just considered trying to look at it myself and, after digging through tons of configury, come to the same conclusion. I’m right now rebuilding

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Preuße
On 13.05.2016 10:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, > the latest texlive-bin upload FTBFS on, as far as I can see, > all architectures for which luajit is not available, because > it tries to build the embedded luajit. (I’ve checked the x32 > build log, as this currently makes dist-upgrade on my

Bug#824166: texlive-bin: FTBFS due to luajit issues

2016-05-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: texlive-bin Version: 2016.20160512.41045-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on several official and debian-ports architectures Hello Norbert, the latest texlive-bin upload FTBFS on, as far as I can see, all architectures for which luajit is not available, because it tries to build