On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:59:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sorry, this does not help. There is this large thread on
> debian-devel[2] which I triggered and which IMHO goes totally in the
> wrong direction nitpicking about copyrights inside binary packages which
> is IMHO orthogonal to the
Hi Mattia,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:33:06PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hi Andreas! :)
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Currently I can't upload since
> > cufflinks does not build. If the new version of liblemon would not have
> > been rejected by
Hi Andreas! :)
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > We would like to remove 1.60, so please either bump the dependency to
> > 1.61 or (preferred) use the unversioned stuff as provided by
> > src:boost-defaults.
>
> Currently I can't upload since
> cufflinks does not
Hi Mattia,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:59:52PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> your package depend on boost1.60, while we're transition to boost1.61
> (from 1.58). 1.60 never was the default.
>
> We would like to remove 1.60, so please either bump the dependency to
> 1.61 or (preferred) use the
4 matches
Mail list logo
