Bug#840165: fcl bug
On 17/10/16 19:17, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda[2016-10-17 11:31]: >> Please Jochen, could you upload it? > > Will do later. > > @Jose: Can you comment why you added it in > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/fcl.git/commit/?id=2b59789404c96e4fbc6877ef2db0adccbeb8d97b > I remember to see the option while working on enabling the octomap support and enable expecting the build system to do what the option says (strictly enabling SSE). I did not look into the implementation sorry. +1 on removing it. -- Jose Luis Rivero signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#840165: fcl bug
* Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda[2016-10-17 11:31]: > Please Jochen, could you upload it? Will do later. @Jose: Can you comment why you added it in https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/fcl.git/commit/?id=2b59789404c96e4fbc6877ef2db0adccbeb8d97b Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#840165: fcl bug
I have deleted the hack to activate the SSE code. It seems that has no sense. Upstream clarifies in its CMakeLists: #always disable, for now. It justs add -native as parameter to the compiler making it not generic. So it's better to disable. Please Jochen, could you upload it? Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia - A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.