Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Norbert Preining]

Hi Andreas,

> BTW, sorry for the trouble and thanks for your cooperation.

No trouble, thanks for your great work on dblatex, much appreciated!

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert + TeX Live & Debian Developer + http://www.preining.info
GPG: 0x860CDC13fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Andreas Hoenen]

Norbert Preining  wrote:

> > fixed: the bug title says "dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)", but I can see for
> > texlive-latex-extra 2016.20161103-1:
> >
> > Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.8-2~), [...]
>
> Well, when I committed the change it was 0.3.8-2~, and nobody informed
> me that there was 0.3.9-1 since then.

0.3.8-1 was the latest released dblatex version when the new
texlive-extra version broke it (although dblatex is to blame for the
incompatibility due to invoking an internal TeX function).

At this time it had not been decided yet whether the incompatibility
would be fixed by an own patch release (=> 0.3.8-2) or by integrating
a fix into the new upstream release that I was packaging when the bug
was reported (=> 0.3.9-1).

> The version is still correct, as between the fixed version and
> the version against the package breaks there is no other version
> in existence.

Exactly.

BTW, sorry for the trouble and thanks for your cooperation.

Regards, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Hoenen 
GPG: 1024D/B888D2CE
 A4A6 E8B5 593A E89B 496B
 82F0 728D 8B7E B888 D2CE


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Norbert Preining]

> #840189 was the bug in dblatex itself (already closed in October).
> This should have been #840229:

Argg, indeed.

> fixed: the bug title says "dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)", but I can see for
> texlive-latex-extra 2016.20161103-1:
> 
> Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.8-2~), [...]

Well, when I committed the change it was 0.3.8-2~, and nobody informed
me that there was 0.3.9-1 since then.

The version is still correct, as between the fixed version and 
the version against the package breaks there is no other version
in existence.

So I consider this a bug that should be closed (with the correct
bug number, though ;-)

Don't you agree?

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert + TeX Live & Debian Developer + http://www.preining.info
GPG: 0x860CDC13fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Processed: Re: Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1
Bug #840189 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] dblatex 
fails in pdflatex: Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition
Bug #840291 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] 
auto-multiple-choice: FTBFS: ! Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #840189 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #840291 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
840189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840189
840229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840229
840291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840291
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1
Bug #840189 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] dblatex 
fails in pdflatex: Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition
Bug #840291 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] 
auto-multiple-choice: FTBFS: ! Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition.
No longer marked as fixed in versions texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1.

-- 
840189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840189
840291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840291
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

[Vincent Lefevre]

Control: notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1

(wrong bug number, see below)

Hi Norbert,

On 2016-11-03 07:56:07 +, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Source: texlive-extra
> Source-Version: 2016.20161103-1
> 
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> texlive-extra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
[...]
>* break against old dblatex (Closes: #840189)

#840189 was the bug in dblatex itself (already closed in October).
This should have been #840229:

  texlive-latex-extra should Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)

But before closing this bug, I'm wondering whether it has really been
fixed: the bug title says "dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)", but I can see for
texlive-latex-extra 2016.20161103-1:

Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.8-2~), [...]

This doesn't match!

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)