Bug#840725: Bug#840840: pocl: Does not build on several architectures
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > So if the fact remains that pocl does not build anywhere else than on > > intel I need to restrict the set of architectures for libhmsbeagle as > > well. > > Or just restrict the use of OpenCL to the architectures that have pocl? I'd like to do that - but how? I have no idea about all these things. Any hint? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#840725: Bug#840840: pocl: Does not build on several architectures
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2016-10-15 19:57, Andreas Tille wrote: > > because libpoclu-dev is not available on most architectures. Since > > libhmsbeagle has build on all those architectures either the set of > > Build-Depends has changed (may be together with khronos-opencl-clhpp?) > > or there was a point in time when pocl has build on more architectures > > than currently. > > The outdated libhmsbeagle binary packages are from 2.1.2+20150609-1.1, > predating the use of libpoclu-dev (since 2.1.2+20151220-1). > So libhmsbeagle never built successfully with libpoclu-dev on more > architectures than currently (i.e. only on amd64). > > While theoretically pocl could be available on all architectures (that > support CPUs), that doesn't work right now and I don't know if anyone is > working on fixing this. > > > So if the fact remains that pocl does not build anywhere else than on > > intel I need to restrict the set of architectures for libhmsbeagle as > > well. > > Or just restrict the use of OpenCL to the architectures that have pocl? > > Andreas > -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#840725: Bug#840840: pocl: Does not build on several architectures
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 04:27:45PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2016-10-15 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl > > Right, pocl FTBFS everywhere except linux-i386/amd64, and always has > (with maybe some spurious successes when tests were not being run). > Everything outdated on the release architectures has been decrufted. > > Or did you want to file a *wishlist* bug to support more architectures? > FTBFS on an architecture where it has not been built before (i.e. no > outdated binary packages in the archive that would prevent testing > migration) is not RC. Well, the thing is that bug #840725 of libhmsbeagle was reopened[1] because libpoclu-dev is not available on most architectures. Since libhmsbeagle has build on all those architectures either the set of Build-Depends has changed (may be together with khronos-opencl-clhpp?) or there was a point in time when pocl has build on more architectures than currently. So if the fact remains that pocl does not build anywhere else than on intel I need to restrict the set of architectures for libhmsbeagle as well. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840725;msg=22 -- http://fam-tille.de
