Processed: Re: Bug#862769: libbloom FTBFS on amd64: error: expected error 0.100000 but observed 0.200000

2017-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://github.com/jvirkki/libbloom/issues/7
Bug #862769 [src:libbloom] libbloom FTBFS on amd64: error: expected error 
0.10 but observed 0.20
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/jvirkki/libbloom/issues/7'.
> severity -1 important
Bug #862769 [src:libbloom] libbloom FTBFS on amd64: error: expected error 
0.10 but observed 0.20
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

-- 
862769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#862769: libbloom FTBFS on amd64: error: expected error 0.100000 but observed 0.200000

2017-05-17 Thread Roger Shimizu 
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jvirkki/libbloom/issues/7
control: severity -1 important

On Tue, 16 May 2017 22:34:42 +0300
Adrian Bunk  wrote:

> Source: libbloom
> Version: 1.4-6
> Severity: serious
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libbloom=amd64=1.4-6=1494930635=0
> 
> ...
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/test-libbloom
> - Running basic tests -
> - basic -
> bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30 not initialized!
> bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30 not initialized!
> bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30
>  ->entries = 102
>  ->error = 0.10
>  ->bits = 488
>  ->bits per elem = 4.792529
>  ->bytes = 61
>  ->hash functions = 4
> - add_random(10, 0.10, 10, 0, 1, 32, 1) -
> bloom at 0x7ffc4a988b20
>  ->entries = 10
>  ->error = 0.10
>  ->bits = 47
>  ->bits per elem = 4.792529
>  ->bytes = 6
>  ->hash functions = 4
> entries: 10, error: 0.10, count: 10, coll: 2, error: 0.20, bytes: 6
> error: expected error 0.10 but observed 0.20
> Makefile:124: recipe for target 'test' failed
> make[2]: *** [test] Error 1

Thanks for the report!

Considering that:
 - The build actually suceeded, but failed at unit test.
 - the unit test fails at low rate. Recent releases only changed Makefile
   and intended to fix FTBFS issue on kFreeBSD and Hurd. It doesn't affect
   amd64. Previous amd64 was built OK, and all other ARCHs are all built
   OK on latest release.
 - If restart the amd64, it should build OK. Actually I ever built on DoM:
 
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/libbloom/1.4-6/buildlog

So lower the severity.

I already raised this unit test issues upstream.
Hope upstream can give a clue on this.

Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1


pgpE2O0wk1lUd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#862769: libbloom FTBFS on amd64: error: expected error 0.100000 but observed 0.200000

2017-05-16 Thread Adrian Bunk 
Source: libbloom
Version: 1.4-6
Severity: serious

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libbloom=amd64=1.4-6=1494930635=0

...
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/test-libbloom
- Running basic tests -
- basic -
bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30 not initialized!
bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30 not initialized!
bloom at 0x7ffc4a988c30
 ->entries = 102
 ->error = 0.10
 ->bits = 488
 ->bits per elem = 4.792529
 ->bytes = 61
 ->hash functions = 4
- add_random(10, 0.10, 10, 0, 1, 32, 1) -
bloom at 0x7ffc4a988b20
 ->entries = 10
 ->error = 0.10
 ->bits = 47
 ->bits per elem = 4.792529
 ->bytes = 6
 ->hash functions = 4
entries: 10, error: 0.10, count: 10, coll: 2, error: 0.20, bytes: 6
error: expected error 0.10 but observed 0.20
Makefile:124: recipe for target 'test' failed
make[2]: *** [test] Error 1