Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2018-01-10 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2018-01-10 17:26 GMT+01:00 Steve Cotton : > I think the only solution is to port Fife and Sludge to use the khronos-api > package, and drop GLee completely. Sounds like a suitable plan. It makes sense. Greetings, Miry

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2018-01-10 Thread Steve Cotton
Although this GLee bug is fixable, there's another that isn't: Bug#879905: glee: source for GLee.c and GLee.h is missing I think the only solution is to port Fife and Sludge to use the khronos-api package, and drop GLee completely. Steve

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2018-01-10 Thread Miriam Ruiz
The original configure.ac file seems to ve available in http://elf-stone.com/downloads/GLee/GLee-3.03-redist.tar.gz I am attaching it to this mail. Greetings, Miry 2017-10-20 17:24 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie : > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:22:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> So

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:22:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > So you are basically saying that the situation for configure scripts is > less clear-cut and you tend to acknowledge that this is a bug but > usually not a release critical one and it also depends on how the > copyright holder is

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-20 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 20.10.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Simon McVittie: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 14:36:06 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> If you insist on severity >> serious for such a problem, then bug reports with the same severity >> should be filed against packages >> >> a) that do not recreate their build system

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 14:36:06 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > If you insist on severity > serious for such a problem, then bug reports with the same severity > should be filed against packages > > a) that do not recreate their build system at build time > b) all packages that contain a

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-20 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 20.10.2017 um 06:42 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I am quoting: >> >> https://sources.debian.net/src/glee/5.4.0-2/configure/ >> >> The license is very liberal. You can argue that it should be mentioned >> in debian/copyright but

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I am quoting: > > https://sources.debian.net/src/glee/5.4.0-2/configure/ > > The license is very liberal. You can argue that it should be mentioned > in debian/copyright but that does not make the file non-free or > unsuitable

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > This is not true. The configure file is human readable and the preferred > source of modification in this case. Please also note that the author of > glee licensed his work under the more liberal BSD-2-clause license. You > cannot compare

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 22:52:41 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: >> [..] The configure file is human readable and the preferred >> source of modification in this case. Please also note that the author of >> glee licensed his work under the more liberal BSD-2-clause

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Ximin Luo
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 22:52:41 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > [..] The configure file is human readable and the preferred > source of modification in this case. Please also note that the author of > glee licensed his work under the more liberal BSD-2-clause license. You > cannot

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.10.2017 um 22:34 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:23:24PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> ... >> In my opinion the configure script of glee is DFSG-compliant and >> suitable for main. The license states: >> >> # Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> # This

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:23:24PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >... > In my opinion the configure script of glee is DFSG-compliant and > suitable for main. The license states: > > # Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > # This configure script is free software; the Free Software

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.10.2017 um 19:58 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > Source: glee > Version: 5.4.0-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: missing source > > The configure file claims that it was generated using autoconf. Yet the > corresponding source configure.in or configure.ac is missing from the > source package.

Bug#879123: glee: source for configure is missing

2017-10-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: glee Version: 5.4.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: missing source The configure file claims that it was generated using autoconf. Yet the corresponding source configure.in or configure.ac is missing from the source package. This makes the package unsuitable for main in principle.