Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-25 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
Control:  forwarded -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5795 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-25 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
forwarded -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5795 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-20 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
I removed the javadoc package now and it builds find in Sid. Shall I upload it right now? (I still need the upload permission) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 20/03/2018 16:29, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote: > I adopted the patch from Fedora and it looks good. The package builds fine > now and 154 of its reverse-build-dependencies built successfully. 27 failed: Great! > They either failed in compilation due to Java 9 or failed in tests. But I >

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-20 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
I adopted the patch from Fedora and it looks good. The package builds fine now and 154 of its reverse-build-dependencies built successfully. 27 failed: * activemq-activeio * activemq * apache-directory-server * dnssecjava * istack-commons * jackson-datatype-joda * javassist * jayway-jsonpath *

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 08/03/2018 à 13:29, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan a écrit : > I tried building Maven Dependency Tree 2.2 against Maven 3.x and found that > it uses removed APIs, and that patching it would make a huge code change. > Maybe someone else would have a better skill than me to do the job, but I > simply

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-08 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
This is getting awkward... Maven Bundle Plugin does not only rely on old Maven Dependency Tree, but also targets Maven 2.x [1]. What's worse, Maven Dependency Tree 2.x also relies on Maven 2.x [2]. I tried building Maven Dependency Tree 2.2 against Maven 3.x and found that it uses removed

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 03/03/2018 à 14:50, Markus Koschany a écrit : > If it helps with upgrading bnd to a more recent version I'm in favor of it. Well, no objection unless it pulls a herd of Maven 2 dependencies :/

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-03 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 03.03.2018 um 11:32 schrieb 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan: > I propose to bring back Maven Dependency Tree 2.x as a new package that > coexists with its latest version. > > Even in the latest (3.5.0) version, Maven Bundle Plugin still uses those > deprecated APIs in Maven Dependency Tree 2.x. These

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2018-03-03 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
I propose to bring back Maven Dependency Tree 2.x as a new package that coexists with its latest version. Even in the latest (3.5.0) version, Maven Bundle Plugin still uses those deprecated APIs in Maven Dependency Tree 2.x. These deprecated APIs have been removed from Maven Dependency Tree

Bug#880886: maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS with libmaven-dependency-tree-java

2017-11-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: maven-bundle-plugin Version: 2.5.4-6 Severity: serious Some recent change in unstable makes maven-bundle-plugin FTBFS: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/maven-bundle-plugin.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/maven-bundle-plugin.html