Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:05:55 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:51:12AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Please tell me how this would change the environment the _generator_ is > > > running in. > > Maybe I've been away from this bug too long and I need

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:51:12AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Please tell me how this would change the environment the _generator_ is > > running in. > Maybe I've been away from this bug too long and I need to go restudy how the > generator works again, but I think the generator running is

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:56:24 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 11:11:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Would you please check that your /lib/systemd/system/postfix@.service has: > > > > After=network-online.target nss-lookup.target > >

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 11:11:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Would you please check that your /lib/systemd/system/postfix@.service has: > > After=network-online.target nss-lookup.target > Wants=network-online.target > > At least as I understand it, that's supposed to make sure the network

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 09:34:43 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:50:29AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Because I don't get that error when I try to replicate the condition. > > So postconf does not fail for you if inet_interfaces lists an ip the > system

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:50:29AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Because I don't get that error when I try to replicate the condition. So postconf does not fail for you if inet_interfaces lists an ip the system does not currently have? > Feb 09 01:28:58 relay02 postmulti[3783]: fatal:

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:11:15 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 3.2.5-1 > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:24:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >* Rewrite debian/postfix-instance-generator to avoid use of postmulti > > to fix

Bug#882141: closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-07 Thread Bastian Blank
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 3.2.5-1 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:24:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* Rewrite debian/postfix-instance-generator to avoid use of postmulti > to fix failures when inet_interfaces != all Closes: #882141 It now uses postconf -h

Processed: Re: Bug#882141 closed by Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> (Bug#882141: fixed in postfix 3.2.4-1)

2018-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #882141 {Done: Scott Kitterman } [src:postfix] postfix - systemd generator broken with inet_interfaces 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need