On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:51:36 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hello Anton! :-)
>
> thanks for bugreport.
You are welcome.
Thanks for your prompt reply!
> The problem with paraview now is that it does
> not actually have any active maintainer
[...]
I noticed that you removed
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:39:56 +0200 Gert Wollny wrote:
[...]
> These two upstream bugs might also be related:
>
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17202
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/16882
I think the latter (issue
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #894462 [paraview] paraview: edges are blotted [regression]
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
894462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894462
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Hi Francesco,
thanks for bugreport. The problem with paraview now is that it does
not actually have any active maintainer [1]. I am not using it any more
and the Gert (thanks to him!) is doing some technical uploads.
If you really want it to be fixed (as well as export to AVI), feel free
to join
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2018, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli
(wintermute):
> Package: paraview
> Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hello paraview Debian package maintainers,
> thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than
Package: paraview
Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello paraview Debian package maintainers,
thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than Qt4!
I've just upgraded to it on my Debian testing box, but I found a bad
regression that
6 matches
Mail list logo
