Le 05/02/2019 à 15:05, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> The real issue is lombok, it needs both Java 8 and 11 to build (and even
> 6 and 7! But we managed do to without that).
Erratum: I've just figured out how to build lombok with Java 11 only.
Once ivyplusplus is taught about the new javac 'release'
On 2/4/19 10:07 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> What is the specific use case for this, is there some package which
> needs 8 and can't be fixed in time for 11?
Yes, it was stated in this thread earlier that such packages do exist.
Emmanuel/others, is this the correct list of packages which can
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would add a NEWS file to OpenJDK 8 and explain the situation and in
> addition create a wrapper around the OpenJDK 8 java command that prints
> out a message and quits. javac shall continue to work because it is
> needed to build
Am 04.02.19 um 14:56 schrieb Per Lundberg:
> On 2/1/19 11:20 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 01.02.19 10:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>>> This is an excellent suggestion. We should file a bug for openjdk-8 to
>>> implement that.
>> please attach the patch.
>
> Sure, I should be able to write
On 2/1/19 11:20 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01.02.19 10:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> This is an excellent suggestion. We should file a bug for openjdk-8 to
>> implement that.
> please attach the patch.
Sure, I should be able to write something up. Forbear my ignorance:
should I use debconf
On 01.02.19 10:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/02/2019 à 09:17, Per Lundberg a écrit :
>
>> I think that risk is significant. If we go that route, I would suggest a
>> postinst/debhelper message saying that "OpenJDK 8 is included but
>> unsupported. Many packages will not work with it. Use at
6 matches
Mail list logo
