On 2020-10-05 15:35:23 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> In this case, the symbols were private, and incorrectly exposed
> outside, so removing them is "safe" as long as nobody uses them.
I've looked at the repository, and in more details, they were
incorrectly exposed outside via the symbol
Hello Joerg,
> We are not back.
to be honest, yes we are :)
>
> Between 1.0.30 and 1.0.31 are the following 7 symbols are not longer
> available:
>
> #MISSING: 1.0.31# testing_append_commands_node@Base 1.0.29
> #MISSING: 1.0.31# testing_known_commands_input_failed@Base 1.0.29
> #MISSING:
On 2020-10-04 18:26:31 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2020-10-04 17:59:33 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > We are not back.
> >
> > Between 1.0.30 and 1.0.31 are the following 7 symbols are not longer
> > available:
> >
> > #MISSING: 1.0.31# testing_append_commands_node@Base 1.0.29
> >
On 2020-10-04 17:59:33 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> We are not back.
>
> Between 1.0.30 and 1.0.31 are the following 7 symbols are not longer
> available:
>
> #MISSING: 1.0.31# testing_append_commands_node@Base 1.0.29
> #MISSING: 1.0.31# testing_known_commands_input_failed@Base 1.0.29
>
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 04.10.2020, 16:44 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: found -1 1.0.31-2
> Control: fixed -1 1.0.27-3.1
>
> On 2018-09-12 16:14:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Package: libsane1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > libsane was
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 1.0.31-2
Control: fixed -1 1.0.27-3.1
On 2018-09-12 16:14:51 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: libsane1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> libsane was renamed to libsane1 for apparently no good reason. Renames
> for library packages should be tied to ABI
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #908681 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [libsane1] libsane1:
pointless package rename
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer
Hi,
is this related to conflicts with the gnome package in sid?
(apt dist-upgrade)
To be removed:
colord gnome gnome-color-manager gnome-control-center gnome-core
libsane1 libsane1:i386 sane-utils simple-scan task-gnome-desktop
Held back:
libtiff5
Upgrade:
libsane-common
Regards,
Nils
Hi Laurent!
On 11/6/18 2:09 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> This bug is open for more than a month without any recent reaction from the
> maintainer, multiple people have asked for the status over the month of
> October (including mails addressed directly to the maintainer), nothing.
That bug
Le 5/11/18 à 23:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
Hello Lauren!
Hello,
Is there any reason why you are hijacking the package here and overriding
a maintainer's decision without contacting the Debian CTTE?
This bug is open for more than a month without any recent reaction from
the
On 11/6/18 12:04 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Was this a hijack or NMU? I saw a NMU to DELAYED with a log
> in the bug announcing it. I may have missed something
I'm the sponsor, I was not put in the loop over this decision
and Joerg may not have been available the past three days.
Joerg
Was this a hijack or NMU? I saw a NMU to DELAYED with a log in the bug
announcing it. I may have missed something
paultag
Hello Lauren!
Is there any reason why you are hijacking the package here and overriding
a maintainer's decision without contacting the Debian CTTE?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin -
Hi Jörg,
it seems there is an accepted solution for this bug since almost two weeks:
- rename libsane1 back to libsane
- add a "Provides: libsane1" to libsane
see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908681#51
Why isn't that route followed?
Thanks,
Philip
signature.asc
On 14.10.18 at 14:35 Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 19:59:38 Philip Rinn wrote:
>> Control: -1 severity normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I lower the severity of this bug as I couldn't find a severe violation of the
>> Debian policy - please point me to it if
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #908681 [libsane1] libsane1: pointless package rename
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
908681: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908681
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: -1 severity normal
Hi,
I lower the severity of this bug as I couldn't find a severe violation of the
Debian policy - please point me to it if I missed something.
Best,
Philip
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:06 AM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Some libraries have way too many public symbols and many of the
> symbols aren't considered part of the API so dropping or changing them
> isn't a serious problem.
Yeah, the API is far shorter than the 7000 symbols according to its
most
The question here is difficult. My initial thinking was that the
rename was unnecessary. Eventually, I added the Provides as a
compromise.
The issue is that there are third-party scanner driver .deb packages
that won't be quickly re-compiled against the new sane-backends. I do
see that there are
On 09/16/2018 10:54 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2018, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> Package: libsane1
>> Severity: serious
>
>> Hi,
>
>> libsane was renamed to libsane1 for apparently no good
>> reason. Renames
>> for library packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Julien,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2018, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Package: libsane1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> libsane was renamed to libsane1 for apparently no good
> reason. Renames
> for library packages should be tied to
Package: libsane1
Severity: serious
Hi,
libsane was renamed to libsane1 for apparently no good reason. Renames
for library packages should be tied to ABI breakage (and associated
SONAME changes).
Either there was ABI breakage and the SONAME should be bumped (and
Provides: libsane would be
22 matches
Mail list logo
