Bug#915007: opensaml2 FTBFS with xmltooling 3

2018-12-03 Thread Sam Hartman
Built fine I have not yet tested against moonshot On December 3, 2018 8:52:10 AM EST, "Cantor, Scott" wrote: >On 12/1/18, 4:48 AM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of wf...@niif.hu" >on behalf of wf...@niif.hu> wrote: > >> Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that >>

Bug#915007: opensaml2 FTBFS with xmltooling 3

2018-12-03 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 12/1/18, 4:48 AM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of wf...@niif.hu" wrote: > Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that > version 3 of the resolver uses pkg-config for finding the SP, which is > cool in principle but nobody tested it in Debian yet, so that may >

Bug#915007: opensaml2 FTBFS with xmltooling 3

2018-12-01 Thread wferi
Sam Hartman writes: > Don't wait for me on shibboleth-resolver or moonshot-gss-eap to file the > removal requests. > They are both basically broken in unstable, so there's no reason to > block. Hi, Removal requests filed. Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that

Bug#915007: opensaml2 FTBFS with xmltooling 3

2018-11-30 Thread Sam Hartman
Don't wait for me on shibboleth-resolver or moonshot-gss-eap to file the removal requests. They are both basically broken in unstable, so there's no reason to block.

Bug#915007: opensaml2 FTBFS with xmltooling 3

2018-11-29 Thread Ferenc Wágner
peter green writes: > I then had a poke around and noticed that an "opensaml" source package > had recently been uploaded that seems to have taken over most of the > binary package names from opensaml2. If the intention is for opensaml > to replace opensaml2 can you file a removal request? Hi,