Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 09:39:00 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > Any last words before we file an RM bug? > None from me. RM bug filed: #971661 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bob Dylan: Highlands signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
Hi, gregor herrmann (2020-09-26): > All reverse build dependencies are fixed Congrats to everyone who helped make this happen ! \o/ > Any last words before we file an RM bug? None from me. Cheers!
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:23:42 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Simon McVittie (2020-08-20): > >> I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their > >> maintainer about this situation. > > Should the bugs against rdeps be escalated to serious at this point, > > potentially triggering autoremovals? > I think now is a good time, indeed. Doing so. All reverse build dependencies are fixed, and: $ dak rm -s unstable -Rn pkg-components Will remove the following packages from unstable: pkg-components | 0.13 | source, all Maintainer: Debian Perl Group --- Reason --- -- Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Any last words before we file an RM bug? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Element Of Crime: Seit der Himmel signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
Hi, intrigeri (2020-08-20): > Simon McVittie (2020-08-20): >>> I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their >>> maintainer about this situation. >> >> Should the bugs against rdeps be escalated to serious at this point, >> potentially triggering autoremovals? > > I think now is a good time, indeed. Doing so. So, all direct rdeps are now marked for autoremoval except libcgi-application-perl. I suppose that's because libcgi-application-perl itself has 2 dozens rdeps, so I took a closer look ⇒ I'll send details on #933111.
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
Control: severity 933111 serious Control: severity 933112 serious Control: severity 933113 serious Control: severity 933114 serious Control: severity 933115 serious Control: severity 933116 serious Control: severity 933118 serious Hi, Simon McVittie (2020-08-20): > It's been over a year and this doesn't seem to have happened. Thanks for the poke :) >> I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their >> maintainer about this situation. > > Should the bugs against rdeps be escalated to serious at this point, > potentially triggering autoremovals? I think now is a good time, indeed. Doing so.
Processed: Re: Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
Processing control commands: > severity 933111 serious Bug #933111 [libcgi-application-perl] libcgi-application-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933112 serious Bug #933112 [libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl] libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933113 serious Bug #933113 [libcgi-application-plugin-authorization-perl] libcgi-application-plugin-authorization-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933114 serious Bug #933114 [libcgi-application-plugin-devpopup-perl] libcgi-application-plugin-devpopup-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933115 serious Bug #933115 [libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl] libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933116 serious Bug #933116 [libcgi-application-plugin-viewcode-perl] libcgi-application-plugin-viewcode-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 933118 serious Bug #933118 [libwww-search-perl] libwww-search-perl: build-depends on pkg-components that won't be in Bullseye unless it finds a new upstream maintainer Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 933110: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933110 933111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933111 933112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933112 933113: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933113 933114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933114 933115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933115 933116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933116 933118: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933118 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 16:29:23 -0300, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > The Debian Perl group has, somewhat unwillingly, inherited the role of > upstream maintainer for this native package, when its original author > stopped taking care of it. We don't feel we're in a good position to > wear this hat and would rather not to. > > Therefore, we decided at the pkg-perl BoF today at DebConf that we > don't want this package to be included in Bullseye, unless someone > else steps up and becomes its upstream maintainer. It's been over a year and this doesn't seem to have happened. > I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their > maintainer about this situation. Should the bugs against rdeps be escalated to serious at this point, potentially triggering autoremovals? smcv
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:42:03 -0300, intrigeri wrote: > > I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their > > maintainer about this situation. > > Done. All such bug reports are usertagged "pkg-components-removal" so > they'll appear there shortly: > > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=pkg-components-removal=debian-perl%40lists.debian.org For the affected reverse-dependencies: The javascript team has nice instructions for using "components" with uscan and gbp at https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial and I just "ported" libhtml-template-pluggable-perl: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libhtml-template-pluggable-perl Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- signature.asc Description: Digital Signature
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
> I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their > maintainer about this situation. Done. All such bug reports are usertagged "pkg-components-removal" so they'll appear there shortly: https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=pkg-components-removal=debian-perl%40lists.debian.org Cheers, -- intrigeri
Bug#933110: pkg-components: No upstream maintainer ⇒ unsuitable for Bullseye
Package: pkg-components Version: 0.11 Severity: serious Hi, The Debian Perl group has, somewhat unwillingly, inherited the role of upstream maintainer for this native package, when its original author stopped taking care of it. We don't feel we're in a good position to wear this hat and would rather not to. Therefore, we decided at the pkg-perl BoF today at DebConf that we don't want this package to be included in Bullseye, unless someone else steps up and becomes its upstream maintainer. I'll file bugs against all reverse-dependencies to alert their maintainer about this situation. Cheers, -- intrigeri
