Hi all,
On 31-12-2019 22:50, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi László,
>
>> File "/<>/tests/admin_inlines/tests.py", line 1, in
>> from selenium.common.exceptions import NoSuchElementException
>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'selenium'
>>
>> Are you going to upload it fixed to Sid?
>
>
Hi László,
> File "/<>/tests/admin_inlines/tests.py", line 1, in
> from selenium.common.exceptions import NoSuchElementException
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'selenium'
>
> Are you going to upload it fixed to Sid?
Thanks for uploading sqlite. This exception was already fixed in
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 10:07 PM László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:57 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I don't fully understand the ramifications or risks of uploading the
> > current Fossil tree I'm afraid so I will have to leave that judgement
> > to you. Can you let me know
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:57 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> I don't fully understand the ramifications or risks of uploading the
> current Fossil tree I'm afraid so I will have to leave that judgement
> to you. Can you let me know your intention either way so that we don't
> lose this down the
Hi László,
> scheduled to 31st of December, this year but it was delayed with a
> whole month later
I don't fully understand the ramifications or risks of uploading the
current Fossil tree I'm afraid so I will have to leave that judgement
to you. Can you let me know your intention either way so
Hi Paul, Chris,
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 4:27 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> > @python-django maintainers what does this mean for the functionality of
> > python-django in bullseye? Is it "only" the test that fails and can that
> > thus be temporarily disabled?
>
> I would be amenable to disabling the
Hi Paul,
> @python-django maintainers what does this mean for the functionality of
> python-django in bullseye? Is it "only" the test that fails and can that
> thus be temporarily disabled?
I would be amenable to disabling the test in python-django if a
response or fix in sqlite3 is not
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:17:01 +0100 "Chris Lamb" wrote:
> Hi László,
>
> > But you mean plural packages? I knew only python-django. I meant
> > sure, it's a FTBFS in experimental where […]
>
> I see what you mean now, thanks. I assumed it affected more packages
> and was more severe than
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 08:19:20 +0900 "ISHIKAWA,chiaki"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I am not mistaken, Ubuntu version used on Mozilla's build server
> farms uses rather very old version of sqlite3.
>
>
> > [task 2019-10-31T22:44:44.290Z] ++ NAME=Ubuntu
> > [task 2019-10-31T22:44:44.290Z] ++
Hi,
If I am not mistaken, Ubuntu version used on Mozilla's build server
farms uses rather very old version of sqlite3.
[task 2019-10-31T22:44:44.290Z] ++ NAME=Ubuntu
[task 2019-10-31T22:44:44.290Z] ++ VERSION='16.04.5 LTS (Xenial Xerus)'
[task 2019-10-31T22:44:44.290Z] ++ ID=ubuntu
Dear Laszló,
Thank you for your e-mail.
(Sorry my local system does not seem to have the correct font for the
character in your name, and so I am not sure if I am writing the name
correctly.
I hope it will show correctly on your end.)
My comments inline:
On 2019/11/01 23:44, László
Hi Chiaki,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:09 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
> I vouch that there seems to be a serious issue in libsqlite3 3.30.1-1.
It's not that fatal like it may seem so.
> I came here because it seems that I have an issue with sqlite3 on my
> linux installation.
> The problem
Hi,
I vouch that there seems to be a serious issue in libsqlite3 3.30.1-1.
I came here because it seems that I have an issue with sqlite3 on my
linux installation.
The problem manifested as database operation failures during thunderbird
mail client regression testing (called mach
Hi László,
> But you mean plural packages? I knew only python-django. I meant
> sure, it's a FTBFS in experimental where […]
I see what you mean now, thanks. I assumed it affected more packages
and was more severe than just python-django from the description, but
I admittedly had done no
On 26/10/2019 17.13, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> In short, I don't get the importance of filing a FTBFS bug for a beta
> release in experimental.
I'm filing bugs for artefacts discovered by QA. I don't know if it is a
beta, RC, or whatever release. I only noticed "something is not
working".
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:48 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> Not quite sure what you mean by bad. It's "bad" in that it's causing
> an FTBFS in other packages, but I don't think that's quite what you
> meant here. :)
>
Yeah, you are British. :) But you mean plural packages? I knew only
Hi László,
> > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30879
> >
> > It appears to be an issue in sqlite 3.30.1.
>
> Indeed, the bug is in SQLite3 but the mentioned fix and its successor
> don't fix this issue. The current HEAD yes, but that may introduce
> other problems. I'm interested how
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:33 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
> > python-django/experimental FTBFS:
>
> Indeed. I noticed this after uploading and reported it upstream here:
>
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30879
>
> It appears to be an issue in sqlite 3.30.1.
>
Indeed, the bug is in SQLite3
reassign 943509 sqlite3 3.30.1-1
affects 943509 python-django
thanks
Hi Andreas,
> python-django/experimental FTBFS:
Indeed. I noticed this after uploading and reported it upstream here:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30879
It appears to be an issue in sqlite 3.30.1.
Regards,
--
und in versions python-django/2:3.0~beta1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #943509 to the same values
previously set
Bug #943509 [sqlite3] python-django: FTBFS due to failed tests: failures=7,
skipped=891, expected failures=4
Marked as found in versions sqlite3/3.30.1-1.
> affects
Source: python-django
Version: 2:3.0~beta1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
python-django/experimental FTBFS:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.0%7Ebeta1-1=1571079369=0
21 matches
Mail list logo
