On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 23:42:10 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Can you please also add this patch to fix arm64 build failures with default
> clang-10?
The arm64 build no longer uses clang, so I don’t think this is necessary (and
it should be handled differently anyway AFAICT, see the extra
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:08:35 -0400, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:28 PM Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Thanks for the report, the package is missing a build-dependency on
> > gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64.
>
> There is more to it than this. I am working on it now.
Yes, so far I’ve run
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:28 PM Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Thanks for the report, the package is missing a build-dependency on
> gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64.
There is more to it than this. I am working on it now.
> Michael, I can take care of fixing this, doing a rebuild to make sure and
> uploading, if you
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 23:28:04 +0200 Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:45:28 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > checking for amd64-w64-mingw32-gcc... no
> > >
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:45:28 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > checking for amd64-w64-mingw32-gcc... no
> > checking for x86_64-mingw32msvc-gcc... no
> > checking for
Source: wine-development
Version: 5.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200402 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for
6 matches
Mail list logo
