Bug#964957: ugrep: Baseline violation on several architectures

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:49:46PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi Adrian Hi Ricardo, > I am planning to send to my mentor this for his review: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ribalda-guest/ugrep/-/commit/9844a1fd02245d26f67173485e03ff99c16a1ec8 > > Please share any comment if you feel

Bug#964957: ugrep: Baseline violation on several architectures

Hi Adrian I am planning to send to my mentor this for his review: https://salsa.debian.org/ribalda-guest/ugrep/-/commit/9844a1fd02245d26f67173485e03ff99c16a1ec8 Please share any comment if you feel that is not correct. I am new here ;) Cheers On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 3:11 PM Ricardo Ribalda

Bug#964957: ugrep: Baseline violation on several architectures

Hi Adrian Thanks for your message. I have been Out Of office the last two weeks, let me take a look at this asap. Best regards On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:33 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Source: ugrep > Version: 2.1.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > After looking at the build log and sources, there

Bug#964957: ugrep: Baseline violation on several architectures

Source: ugrep Version: 2.1.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious After looking at the build log and sources, there are several baseline violations due to the package being built for what is supported on the buildd instead of the architecture baseline: - -march=native is always wrong in a distribution build