On 24 October 2021 at 11:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-10-23 19:44:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as
kindly
| > analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
| > just went
On 2021-10-23 19:44:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
> analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
> just went out to unstable.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release
I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
just went out to unstable.
Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release team on board for a proper
transition. Correct?
Dirk
--
On 16 October 2021 at 17:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-10-15 13:54:07 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 15 October 2021 at 20:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| > | On 2021-10-15 10:38:48 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | >
| > | > Turns out this was fully my fault. The 2.7
On 2021-10-15 13:54:07 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 15 October 2021 at 20:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | On 2021-10-15 10:38:48 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > Turns out this was fully my fault. The 2.7 release sets the SO number to
> 26,
> | > and I didn't use that.
>
On 15 October 2021 at 20:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-10-15 10:38:48 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Turns out this was fully my fault. The 2.7 release sets the SO number to 26,
| > and I didn't use that.
|
| No, it doesn't. gsl 2.7 has current=26 and age=1, meaning the the
On 2021-10-15 10:38:48 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Turns out this was fully my fault. The 2.7 release sets the SO number to 26,
> and I didn't use that.
No, it doesn't. gsl 2.7 has current=26 and age=1, meaning the the SOVERSION
is 25. gsl 2.6 had current=25, age=0. Increasing current
Turns out this was fully my fault. The 2.7 release sets the SO number to 26,
and I didn't use that.
So a new package will be forthcoming, and likely need a transition. That
means I should upload to experimental first, right, to then request the
transition? (I'll read up on it later today as a
Graham,
On 15 October 2021 at 13:34, Graham Inggs wrote:
| > Yes. And I follow upstream. They didn't change :-/
|
| Right, so please speak to your upstream. Dropping (or renaming) a
Done.
Looks like a 2.8 release is coming, so maybe the soname gets cleaned up there
and we get to do (yet
Hi Dirk
> Yes. And I follow upstream. They didn't change :-/
Right, so please speak to your upstream. Dropping (or renaming) a
symbol is changing the ABI in a backward-incompatible way, and they
need to bump the SONAME (or revert the change).
This is not something Debian-specific, this is how
On 14 October 2021 at 23:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-10-14 15:52:03 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Hi Sebastian,
| >
| > On 14 October 2021 at 22:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| > | Hi Dirk
| > |
| > | On 2021-08-30 16:27:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | >
| > |
On 2021-10-14 15:52:03 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 14 October 2021 at 22:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | Hi Dirk
> |
> | On 2021-08-30 16:27:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 30 August 2021 at 23:42, Niko Tyni wrote:
> | > | Package: libgsl25
> |
Hi Sebastian,
On 14 October 2021 at 22:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| Hi Dirk
|
| On 2021-08-30 16:27:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 30 August 2021 at 23:42, Niko Tyni wrote:
| > | Package: libgsl25
| > | Version: 2.7+dfsg-2
| > | Control: affects -1 libmath-gsl-perl
| > |
Hi Dirk
On 2021-08-30 16:27:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 August 2021 at 23:42, Niko Tyni wrote:
> | Package: libgsl25
> | Version: 2.7+dfsg-2
> | Control: affects -1 libmath-gsl-perl
> | Severity: serious
> |
> | gsl 2.7 broke libmath-gsl-perl on runtime, as seen in the
On 30 August 2021 at 23:42, Niko Tyni wrote:
| Package: libgsl25
| Version: 2.7+dfsg-2
| Control: affects -1 libmath-gsl-perl
| Severity: serious
|
| gsl 2.7 broke libmath-gsl-perl on runtime, as seen in the autopkgtest
regressions:
|
|not ok 7 - use Math::GSL::Matrix;
|
|#
Package: libgsl25
Version: 2.7+dfsg-2
Control: affects -1 libmath-gsl-perl
Severity: serious
gsl 2.7 broke libmath-gsl-perl on runtime, as seen in the autopkgtest
regressions:
not ok 7 - use Math::GSL::Matrix;
# Failed test 'use Math::GSL::Matrix;'
# at t/00-load.t line 14.
16 matches
Mail list logo
