also sprach James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.16.1421 +0100]:
Yes, it was included in 1:7.1-135+1. I was just noting the actual
patch that fixed the bug in case someone has to use a hypothetical
7.1-080 package from distribution X. If they check for
has('patch073') instead of
On 10/16/07, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, bittornado failed to upgrade. I think this was either
caused by a prerm failure or an unpack failure, leading in the end to
have only bittornado 0.3.18-3 installed. So there's probably a bug in
bittornado. It would be nice if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 445840 normal
Bug#445840: irssi: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 445840 wnpp
Bug#445840: irssi: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `irssi' to `wnpp'.
retitle 445840
severity 445840 normal
reassign 445840 wnpp
retitle 445840 O: irssi -- terminal based IRC client
thanks
Hi,
Based on past discussions on this bug and on #421053, I am now
orphaning irssi.
David Pashley has unfortunately been unable to dedicate enough time to
maintain irssi, promising several
forwarded 446974 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12578
thank you
Ionut Ciocirlan wrote:
Package: x11proto-render-dev
Version: 2:0.9.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ gcc -c /usr/include/X11/extensions/renderproto.h -o /tmp/foo
In file included from
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#429480: fixed in clustalw 1.83-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378483: fixed in clustalw 1.83-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413658: fixed in netperf 2.4.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 446974 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12578
Bug#446974: x11proto-render-dev: /usr/include/X11/extensions/renderproto.h
fails to compile
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Package: libssl-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.9-sara1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Justin Pryzby wrote:
I think that should be declared, right?
yep, sorry about that, and thanks for finding that bug.
Partial upgrades are
supposed to be supported. At least shouldn't the it be declared as
a conflicts?
i think, a tighter versioned depends is enough (which i've just uploaded
reassign 443028 gcc-4.2
forwarded 443028 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947
thankyou
Unmasking the Makefile results in this:
vital_timing.cc: In function 'array_typelong long int
L4ieee_Q12vital_timing_Y22vitalextendtofilldelay_i259(const
array_typelong long int)':
vital_timing.cc:1055: internal compiler
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 444517 +patch
Bug#444517: happydigger: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 444517 +patch
thanks
This bug is fixed by removing the GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED define which
prevented the GtkTooltips stuff from being actually included.
The attached patch solves the problem, but rerunning autogen with the
new change would be better, IMHO.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
Package: slony1
Version: 1.2.11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hi!
Here is the bugreport that you requested before working on the problem.
This is from the changelog:
! - Fixed a problem with EXECUTE SCRIPT (introduced in remote_worker.c
! version 1.124.2.13) where moving the
tags 444502 +patch
thanks
The fix for this bug is to remove the GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED macro. I
can't prepare a real patch due to the absence of an extracted source
tree, but I think this is good enough to be tagged a patch.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 444502 +patch
Bug#444502: jack-rack: FTBFS: undefined reference to `GTK_FILE_SELECTION'
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:18:55 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#445292: fixed in pykdeextensions 0.4.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: mongrel
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
From what I remember from our rubygems discussions, the conclusion was
that the rubygems package was here for users to install packages, not
for other packages to use it. [0]
[0] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:17:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413658: fixed in netperf 2.4.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:18:54 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424505: fixed in pykdeextensions 0.4.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:18:54 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439504: fixed in pykdeextensions 0.4.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
tags 439626 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my pure-ftpd 1.0.21-11.1 NMU.
Sorry for answering late, but I cannot see any fix for #439626 in your
patch.
Regards
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and
[now also sending to the right bug...]
Hi Sam,
as discussed on irc I've created a patch for rcalc. As I had to modify
the menu entries anyway, I've also fixed #446749.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzed.de/
diff -Nuwr
Çrş, 2007-10-17 tarihinde 00:11 +0200 saatinde, Amir Tabatabaei yazdı:
Please do the following as root and report if it worked out:
update-alternatives --auto swt.jar
today after the libgtk and libswt updates both azureus 2.5.0.4 and
3.0.3.4 started working :D
Have a nice day.
Regards,
Hi,
well, acctually it depends on libgems-ruby1.8 . Do you consider this to
be the same as depend on rubygems? Also, I don't know if it will be easy
to remove this dependency because mongrel plugin system
(libgemplugin-ruby) uses some functions of libgems-ruby1.8. I'n not sure
at the moment,
severity 28 important
severity 443918 important
merge 28 443918
thanks
Here's a snippet from IRC that carrying an explanation from GNOME Team.
Though still present, the problem is already solved by binNMUs, so lower
the severity.
manphiz any one had a look at #28? It seems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 28 important
Bug#28: libwnck-common replaces libwnck1, but does not provide it
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
severity 443918 important
Bug#443918: libwnck18: dependencies problem
Severity set to `important' from `minor'
The workarounds doesn't work for me, I have this problem and I cannot
solve it.
Do you know when this bug will be solved?
Thanks!
Mattia.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424464: fixed in libgtk2-perl 1:1.161-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: strigi-daemon
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Strigi daemon segfaults during startup. It leaves lock and socket in
/home/$USER/.strigi
Nothing is printed on console.
$ gdb strigidaemon
[...]
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/strigidaemon
(no
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:58:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line azureus still does not start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Check out USA TOP 100 Music Albums now!
Daily updates! Freshest releases! Hottest singles! Live and concerts!
Editorial choices and music industry awards!
Every genre, every famous artist, every breaking single!
All this can be downloaded from http://www.usa-bestsellers.com/
Download all this
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:58:21 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line azureus still does not start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: wavsplit
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
I have a 4,7 GB wav file i'm trying to split into multiple files.
When i'm running wavsplit on this file i have the following output:
$ wavsplit -H
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:10:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line There are not reverse depedencies on libterralib1-dev in the
archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Thank you for the reply. So the move is to upgrade gimp and, as a result,
uninstall gimp-print. Is it OK?
The question is: is it necessary to install gimp-gutenprint (it is in the
repository since yesterday)? When is gimp-gutenprint necessary?
Thank you
pacakge perl
forcemerge 443785 443558 446629
tag 443785 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The patch attached by Matt Kraai for 443785 also fixed the other RC bug
(#443558) and another important bug.
Since both of the RC bugs are open for ~25 days, I have prepared an NMU.
There is an NMU policy[0] in effect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
pacakge perl
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
forcemerge 443785 443558 446629
Bug#443785: h2ph does not generate correct output for #if defined __x86_64__
Bug#443558: perl: syscall.ph returns incorrect numbers
Bug#446629: Can't
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:02:14PM -0400, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
fixed 441407 2.2.3-1
kthxbye
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Package: gallery2
Version: 2.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
As you know Gallery 2.2.3 has been released
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:32:36 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421684: fixed in libgnome2-vfs-perl 1.080-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:32:36 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421684: fixed in libgnome2-vfs-perl 1.080-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
retitle 446864 missing dependency on libxaw7-dev
thanks
Package: libt1-dev
Version: 5.1.1-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
In the end it seems that this bug boils down to a missing dependency
from libt1-dev to libxaw7-dev. Indeed the latter package is listed as a
*build*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 443028 g++-4.2
Bug#443028: freehdl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [vital_timing.lo] Error 1
Bug reassigned from package `freehdl' to `g++-4.2'.
tags 443028 +upstream
Bug#443028: freehdl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [vital_timing.lo] Error 1
There were no tags
tags 446864 + patch
thanks
Hi, please find attached the debdiff for the fixed package I'm going to
upload (delayed by 7 days).
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 446864 + patch
Bug#446864: missing dependency on libxaw7-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:29:27AM +0200]:
From what I remember from our rubygems discussions, the conclusion was
that the rubygems package was here for users to install packages, not
for other packages to use it. [0]
[0]
reassign 443028 g++-4.2
tags 443028 +upstream
forwarded 443028 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947
thankyou
I forgot to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hence this mail.
Sorry.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600036
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna
Today I upgraded sid and it started to work... I was using oowriter
from testing for last couple of days, today I did:
$ wajig update
Get:1 http://ftp.cz.debian.org sid Release.gpg [189B]
Ign http://ftp.cz.debian.org sid/main Translation-en_US
Get:2 http://ftp.cz.debian.org sid Release [79.6kB]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 446864 missing dependency on libxaw7-dev
Bug#446864: missing dep on libxpm-dev (or spurious -lXpm in .la file)
Changed Bug title to `missing dependency on libxaw7-dev' from `missing dep on
libxpm-dev (or spurious -lXpm in .la file)'.
thanks
446968 severity normal
Thanks
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 the mental interface of
Sean told:
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.14-2
Severity: grave
Not really grave;)
Justification: renders package unusable
Thousnds of users are happy with alsa 1.0.14!
After upgrading my kernel from 2.6.18-4 to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
forcemerge 443931 444041
Bug#443931: libgtkhtml3.14-19: Cannot install
Bug#444041: libgtkhtml3.14-19: Conflicts gtkhtml3.14 (3.14-3-1)
Forcibly Merged 443931 444041.
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 446968 normal
Bug#446968: alsa-base: Alsa only works after /etc/init.d/alsa restart, then
fails again later
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Gary,
Is there any way you can get a stack backtrace out of this? Like
attaching gdb to a httpd process and then causing the segfault?
Thanks,
Tyler
Gary Kramlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libapache2-mod-bt
Version: 0.0.19+p4.2340-1
Severity: grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
severity 446982 grave
Bug#446982: hobbit: hobbit.postinst changes owner of /tmp directory
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: rdesktop
Version: 1.5.0-2+cvs20071006
Followup-For: Bug #445779
The problem was introduced with rev. 1.224 in rdesktop/xwin.c.
The problematic call is XGetPointerMapping, which is called with a 16 entry
buffer, with the expectation that XGetPointerMapping will return 16 as a
maximum
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:13:05AM +0200, Jaap Dijkshoorn wrote:
Package: libssl-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
There should be a libssl-dev version 0.9.8c-4etch1 too from where you
got your libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-4etch1.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 the mental interface of
Mathias Brodala told:
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.14-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I know this sounds weird, but somehow alsa-utils breaks every action I try to
do
with APT. For example simply trying to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
package hobbit hobbit-client
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hobbit-client hobbit
tags 446982 + pending
Bug#446982: hobbit: hobbit.postinst changes owner of /tmp directory
There were
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#446982: fixed in hobbit 4.2.0.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 438538 grave
Bug#438538: mpop: version 1.0.5-1etch1 uninstallable on Etch
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
tags 438538 security sarge
Bug#438538: mpop: version 1.0.5-1etch1 uninstallable on Etch
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Package: rrdtool
Version: 1.2.15-0.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
rrdtool always seg fault when using GPRINT function. This make the use of the
tool very limited.
# rrdtool graph test.png DEF:a=a.rrd:fan:AVERAGE GPRINT:a:AVERAGE:%lf
Segmentation fault
Follow the
On 17/10/07 at 08:38 -0200, Filipe wrote:
Hi,
well, acctually it depends on libgems-ruby1.8 . Do you consider this to
be the same as depend on rubygems?
Well, kind of.
Also, I don't know if it will be easy
to remove this dependency because mongrel plugin system
(libgemplugin-ruby) uses
Hi Elimar.
Elimar Riesebieter, 17.10.2007 17:56:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 the mental interface of
Mathias Brodala told:
[…]
I know this sounds weird, but somehow alsa-utils breaks every action I try
to do
with APT. For example simply trying to install gedit:
[…]
Did apt-get install -f
Package: openh323-titan
Version: 1.19.1~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
As seen on buildd's:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openh323-titan;ver=1.19.1%7Edfsg-1;arch=hppa;stamp=1192517307
-snip-
/usr/bin/make OPENH323DIR=/build/buildd/openh323-titan-1.19.1~dfsg docs
make[1]:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 440834 grave
Bug#440834: gdebi : error on installing deb
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
package libt1-5 libt1-dev libt1-doc t1lib t1lib-bin
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libt1-5 t1lib-bin libt1-doc libt1-dev t1lib
tags 446864 + pending
Bug#446864: missing dependency on
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432633: fixed in esmtp 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007 Oct 09 08:12 -0500]:
Here you are, Joop. I haven't updated this laptop for about a week (I'm
on the road in Salt Lake City, UT doing a certification class for my
company). I'll update it when I get back home.
Thanks, that is quick.
I am
According to NEWS.Debian:
* The gimp package now includes its own Print plug-in, and should
automatically remove the old gimp-print package that was provided by
Gutenprint. If you still want to use the extended Gutenprint Print
plug-in, please install the gimp-gutenprint package.
So
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:18:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
please could somebody prepare a test case (all needed object files,
and the ld command), and add URL for this tarball to the upstream
report at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4988
the full build chroot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 446525 confirmed
Bug#446525: gnubik: crash if size of cube is too large
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
severity 446525 serious
Bug#446525: gnubik: crash if size of cube is too large
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
stop
I haven't been able to install hpijs for over two weeks now (this bug is
18 days old alone), which is making printing really difficult :)
Usually a binNMU doesn't take this long, is there another issue holding
things up?
Micah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package libapache-mod-auth-curdir
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libapache-mod-auth-curdir
reassign 429103 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429103: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-auth-curdir' to
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:13:09PM +0800, Hongzheng Wang wrote:
Hi,
The error log is quite long. So I attach it at the end. One
important thing is: the crashing is not reproduceable all the time
although the success rate is so low :(
Huh? It tries to load
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:28:28AM -0700, Giangiacomo Mariotti wrote:
I attached the strace of eclipse (I haven't looked at this too much,so maybe
I'm saying something stupid,but that
stat(/usr/lib/eclipse//usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar, 0x7fff2eb39d40) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package libapache-mod-auth-plain
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libapache-mod-auth-plain
reassign 429118 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429118: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-auth-plain' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package libapache-mod-limitipconn
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libapache-mod-limitipconn
retitle 429092 RM: libapache-mod-limitipconn -- RoM; obsoleted
Bug#429092: please update/request removal of your package
Changed Bug title to `RM:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 429118 RM: libapache-mod-auth-plain -- RoM; obsoleted
Bug#429118: please update/request removal of your package
Changed Bug title to `RM: libapache-mod-auth-plain -- RoM; obsoleted' from
`please update/request removal of your package'.
--
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:25:18PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:12:09PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: request-tracker3.4
Severity: serious
Version: 3.4.5-2
rt3.4-apache (dependency): apache |apache-perl |apache-ssl
Please either send the ftp team a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 429103 RM: libapache-mod-auth-curdir -- RoM; obsoleted
Bug#429103: please update/request removal of your package
Changed Bug title to `RM: libapache-mod-auth-curdir -- RoM; obsoleted' from
`please update/request removal of your package'.
--
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#446451: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.11.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:47:32 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#447043: fixed in openh323-titan 1.19.1~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
severity 423317 normal
Bug#423317: O: ppscsi -- set of drivers for parallel port attached scanners
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:02:50PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
[I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug fixing as part of TS; Michael is my AM.]
It appears that all the CMake-generated files can safely be removed
during clean, which will both avoid this FTBFS and reduce the size of the
Now it works,It has never worked before for me!
I haven't changed anything,just updated the system as usual,so maybe some of
the latest updates did the trick.It works wherever I start it from and it seems
stable(but I'm still not sure about this).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
found 440834 0.2.4debian1
Bug#440834: gdebi : error on installing deb
Bug marked as found in version 0.2.4debian1.
notfound 440834 0.24debian1
Bug#440834: gdebi : error on installing
Mark,
sorry for causing trouble here - I'm in the process to do a
offical release libzrtpcpp in 2-3 weeks after some more regressions
with the original Zfone implementation. The ZRTP specifications
changes quite a lot, thus the ABI is incompatible. The best way
to overcome this is to recompile
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 15:55, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
WebDav is not in gallery2 2.1.2-2 (version in etch). Reupload is in
gallery2 2.1.2-2 and the attached patch should fix the security issue.
The attached patch seems to contain quite some auxillary changes. Do you think
you can
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 at 07:36:30 -0600, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Simon McVittie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-15 11:30]:
A patch is attached. It makes the following changes to fix the FTBFS:
Um, oops. Patch *really*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 416152
Bug#416152: /system/checkfs start stops boot by complaining there is no device
/dev/hdxx
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Warning: Unknown package 'initng'
Bug closed, send any further explanations
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 15:55, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
WebDav is not in gallery2 2.1.2-2 (version in etch). Reupload is in
gallery2 2.1.2-2 and the attached patch should fix the security issue.
The attached patch seems to contain quite some auxillary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
reassign 441721 octave2.1
Bug#441721: octave2.1_: package content changed if build twice or more times in
a row
Bug reassigned from package `octave2.1_' to `octave2.1'.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 396932
Bug#396932: ieee80211-source: FTBFS building ieee80211-source fails with
module-assistant
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Warning: Unknown package 'ieee80211-source'
Bug#384558: ieee80211-source:
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Gary,
Is there any way you can get a stack backtrace out of this? Like
attaching gdb to a httpd process and then causing the segfault?
Thanks,
Tyler
Gary Kramlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libapache2-mod-bt
Version:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Chris Hanson wrote:
From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We think we've tracked this down to not a kernel revision but the upgrade
from gcc to 4.2, and specifically its treatment of signed integer overflow
as undefined.
Could you try this patch and see if it
Package: democracyplayer
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
INFO got https://channelguide.participatoryculture.org/
AFD changed from -2 to -1
AFD changed from -2 to -1
AFD changed from -2 to -1
AFD changed from -2 to -1
AFD changed from -2 to -1
AFD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Finally, 'net-tools', which is last package related with ja-trans, is
NMUed with a localization by me.
By this work, all translations of ja-trans are finished to merge into
each individual packages.
Takeshi, I believe it's time to remove this package
Hi Michael,
The trace log is produced by a simple command:
strace eclipse
Considering my PATH setting, which actually is strace /usr/bin/eclipse.
I don't know why it will call for /usr/lib/eclipse/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar.
Anyway, the bug has been fixed now :-) In fact, after the latest
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 432819 -1
Bug#432819: ja-trans: should this package be removed?
Bug 432819 cloned as bug 447093.
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#447093: ja-trans: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `ja-trans' to `ftp.debian.org'.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo