Processed: found 858473 in 2.10.0-1, found 857680 in 1:3.8.1-24, found 857680 in llvm-3.9-examples/1:3.9.1-10 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 858473 2.10.0-1 Bug #858473 [uima-doc] uima-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/uima/manuals/*/css -> ../css Marked as found in versions uimaj/2.10.0-1. > found 857680 1:3.8.1-24 Bug #857680 [llvm-3.8-examples] llvm-3.8-examples: broken

Bug#870582: marked as done (libscalapack-openmpi-dev: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack-openmpi.so)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 07:05:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870582: fixed in scalapack 2.0.2-1exp4 has caused the Debian Bug report #870582, regarding libscalapack-openmpi-dev: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853314 src:insighttoolkit4 Bug #853314 [src:ants] ants: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:ants' to 'src:insighttoolkit4'. No longer marked as found in versions ants/2.1.0-4.3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of

Bug#853344: marked as done (ceph: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:40:32 +0300 with message-id <20170806074032.bn5dxfnhthlpevqd@localhost> and subject line ceph builds with gcc 7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853344, regarding ceph: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853601 src:tbb Bug #853601 [src:openturns] openturns: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:openturns' to 'src:tbb'. No longer marked as found in versions openturns/1.7-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug

Bug#853716: marked as done (z3: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:49:42 +0300 with message-id <20170806074942.hdb4mmx6xulae5t2@localhost> and subject line z3 builds with gcc 7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853716, regarding z3: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853370 src:tbb Bug #853370 [src:deal.ii] deal.ii: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:deal.ii' to 'src:tbb'. No longer marked as found in versions deal.ii/8.4.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #853370 to

Bug#853695: marked as done (varnish: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:51:08 +0300 with message-id <20170806075108.gwkygsk3d5m5xkuh@localhost> and subject line varnish builds with gcc 7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853695, regarding varnish: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#870895: gcc-7: libobjc-7-dev--cross: broken symlink: /usr/lib/gcc-cross//7/libobjc_gc.so -> ../../../..//lib/libobjc_gc.so.4

Source: gcc-7 Version: 7.1.0-11 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, new version, new broken symlinks ;-) During a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) a broken symlink. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 0m22.6s

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853538 src:python-sfml Bug #853538 [src:marsshooter] marsshooter: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:marsshooter' to 'src:python-sfml'. No longer marked as found in versions marsshooter/0.7.6-1. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#853454: marked as done (insighttoolkit4: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding insighttoolkit4: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#853617: marked as done (plastimatch: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding plastimatch: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#853602: marked as done (otb: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding otb: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#853419: marked as done (ginkgocadx: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding ginkgocadx: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#853572: marked as done (nifti2dicom: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding nifti2dicom: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#853460: marked as done (itksnap: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding itksnap: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#853386: marked as done (elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#853314: marked as done (ants: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding ants: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#853341: marked as done (camitk: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:00:30 +0200 with message-id <1502010030.6022.2.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: elastix: ftbfs with GCC-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #853386, regarding camitk: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 853614 https://github.com/Pingus/pingus/issues/183 Bug #853614 [src:pingus] pingus: ftbfs with GCC-7 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/Pingus/pingus/issues/183'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#868956: libmspack: CVE-2017-11423

On 05/08/17 10:36, Stuart Caie wrote: libmspack is wrong to convert to unsigned without checking for errors first. When I get to my computer, I'll check all calls to mspack_system read/write/seek/tell methods, to be sure this doesn't happen anywhere else. I checked all the other mspack_system

Bug#870467: marked as done (varnish: CVE-2017-12425: Bogusly large chunk sizes may cause assert)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:33:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870467: fixed in varnish 5.0.0-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #870467, regarding varnish: CVE-2017-12425: Bogusly large chunk sizes may cause assert to be marked as

Bug#868909: marked as done (flightgear: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/CheckSymbolExists.c:8: undefined reference to `pthread_create')

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:53:33 +0200 with message-id <3e561273-2048-6181-081a-214701eff...@bluegap.ch> and subject line Re: flightgear: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/CheckSymbolExists.c:8: undefined reference to `pthread_create' has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#867914: psad: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

Control: tags 867914 + patch Control: tags 867914 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for psad (versioned as 2.4.3-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly

Processed: psad: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

Processing control commands: > tags 867914 + patch Bug #867914 [psad] psad: should depends net-tools Added tag(s) patch. > tags 867914 + pending Bug #867914 [psad] psad: should depends net-tools Added tag(s) pending. -- 867914: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867914 Debian Bug

Bug#853505: marked as done (libqtpas: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:04:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853505: fixed in libqtpas 2.6~beta-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #853505, regarding libqtpas: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Re: cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723 Bug #853345 [src:cernlib] cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723'. > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #853345 [src:cernlib] cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 853345:

Bug#853345: cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7

Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81723 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > gfortran cwerf64.F > E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity that might be a GCC issue, however it would be nice to see the command line arguments passed, and getting a test case extracted.

Bug#869214: marked as done (gosa-plugin-mailaddress: Incompatible with gosa in stable)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#869214: fixed in gosa-plugin-mailaddress 0.99.5-2+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #869214, regarding gosa-plugin-mailaddress: Incompatible with gosa in stable to be

Bug#870208: marked as done ([Mudlet] Bug in Version 3.2.0 and (3.3.0) causes loss of user created content)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:19:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870208: fixed in mudlet 1:3.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #870208, regarding [Mudlet] Bug in Version 3.2.0 and (3.3.0) causes loss of user created content to be

Bug#863934: marked as done (node-dateformat: FTBFS: Test failures ("AssertionError: '1:19:44 PM GMT+0000' === '1:19:44 PM UTC"))

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:32:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#863934: fixed in node-dateformat 1.0.11-3+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #863934, regarding node-dateformat: FTBFS: Test failures ("AssertionError: '1:19:44 PM

Bug#868315: marked as done (kanatest: Kanatest cannot start, segfaults)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:32:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#868315: fixed in kanatest 0.4.8-3+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #868315, regarding kanatest: Kanatest cannot start, segfaults to be marked as done. This means

Bug#858134: marked as done (haveged.service should depend on systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:32:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#858134: fixed in haveged 1.9.1-5+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #858134, regarding haveged.service should depend on systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service to be marked as

Bug#862712: marked as done (node-brace-expansion: regular expression denial of service)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:32:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#862712: fixed in node-brace-expansion 1.1.6-1+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862712, regarding node-brace-expansion: regular expression denial of service to be

Bug#867986: marked as done (CVE-2016-10396)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:32:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#867986: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.8.2+20140711-8+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #867986, regarding CVE-2016-10396 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#853340: marked as done (cadabra: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:48:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853340: fixed in cadabra 1.46-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #853340, regarding cadabra: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#870299: marked as done (links: CVE-2017-11114)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:19:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870299: fixed in links2 2.14-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #870299, regarding links: CVE-2017-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#853406: marked as done (freelan: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:19:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853406: fixed in freelan 2.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #853406, regarding freelan: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#868209: marked as done (CVE-2017-11103: MitM attack, impersonation of the Kerberos client, known as Orpheus Lyre)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:17:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#868209: fixed in samba 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7 has caused the Debian Bug report #868209, regarding CVE-2017-11103: MitM attack, impersonation of the Kerberos client, known

Bug#869856: openssl: FTBFS: Testsuite failures

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:03:30PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 5 August 2017 23:31:33 CEST, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > >I planned to break things by disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1, which I > >might upload soon. I guess I can fix that at the same time. > > Do you intend a

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 853697 src:libcdio Bug #853697 [src:vcdimager] vcdimager: ftbfs with GCC-7 Bug reassigned from package 'src:vcdimager' to 'src:libcdio'. No longer marked as found in versions vcdimager/0.7.24+dfsg-0.2. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Processed: python-genpy: missing dependency on python-yaml

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:ros-bond-core Bug #871042 [python-genpy] python-genpy: missing dependency on python-yaml Added indication that 871042 affects src:ros-bond-core -- 871042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871042 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#871042: python-genpy: missing dependency on python-yaml

Package: python-genpy Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:ros-bond-core https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/ros-bond-core.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ros-bond-core.html ... cd

Processed: Re: Bug#869978: massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #869978 [src:massif-visualizer] massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed) Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 869978: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869978 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#853406: gcc7 and package freelan

Hello Matthias, thank you for making us aware of the FTBFS of freelan with gcc7. Upstream provided a patch and I already uploaded the package. Unfortunately, I hadn't realized that I hadn't extended the validity of my key as DM in the official keyring. I've done that now, but seeing that the

Bug#869978: massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed)

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible On 2017-07-28 14:04:49, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: massif-visualizer > Version: 0.6~git20161031-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: buster sid > > Some recent change in unstable makes massif-visualizer FTBFS: > >

Processed: tagging 870299

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 870299 + pending Bug #870299 [src:links2] links: CVE-2017-4 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 870299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870299 Debian

Bug#869088: unattended-upgrades FTBFS: FAIL: test_untrusted_check_without_conffile_check

Hi Julian, are you aware of the FTBFS in your NMU? Andreas On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:00:58 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: unattended-upgrades > Version: 0.93.1+nmu2 > Severity: serious > >

Bug#871017: marked as done (weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:06:10 -0400 with message-id <87poc8eid9@volesprit.lot-of-stuff.info> and subject line Bug#871017: weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el has caused the Debian Bug report #871017, regarding weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el

Bug#867899: marked as done (sqlobject FTBFS with python 3.6 as supported version)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 17:05:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#867899: fixed in sqlobject 3.4.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #867899, regarding sqlobject FTBFS with python 3.6 as supported version to be marked as done. This

Processed: Bug#871017: weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 871017 0.3.1-2 Bug #871017 [src:weechat-el] weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el The source 'weechat-el' and version '0.3.1-2' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions weechat-el/0.3.1-2. >

Bug#871028: mailavenger FTBFS with gcc 7

Source: mailavenger Version: 0.8.4-4.1 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/mailavenger.html ... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I.. -I/usr/include/pcap -I/usr/include/sasl -I/usr/include

Bug#869978: marked as done (massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed))

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:31:06 +0300 with message-id <20170806183106.7j7nhm7jyunzihds@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#869978: massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed) has caused the Debian Bug report #869978, regarding massif-visualizer FTBFS: datamodeltest (Failed) to be

Bug#871030: mosh FTBFS with gcc 7

Source: mosh Version: 1.3.2-1 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/mosh.html ... In file included from terminalframebuffer.cc:37:0: terminalframebuffer.h: In constructor 'Terminal::Row::Row()': terminalframebuffer.h:87:9: error:

Bug#870850: marked as done (ruby-pkg-config FTBFS: Failure: test_libs_only_l(PkgConfigTest))

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:08:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870850: fixed in ruby-pkg-config 1.2.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #870850, regarding ruby-pkg-config FTBFS: Failure: test_libs_only_l(PkgConfigTest) to be marked as

Bug#871017: weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el

Source: weechat-el Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/weechat-el.html ... debian/rules override_dh_auto_build make[1]: Entering directory '/build/1st/weechat-el-0.3.1' make VERSION=0.3.1 make[2]: Entering directory

Bug#871011: clang-3.8: incompatible with libstdc++-7-dev

Is there any way to use the --gcc-toolchain option to make clang-3.8 use gcc-6? Andreas

Bug#864818: Looks to be fixed upstream in 0.11.5

https://github.com/kennethreitz/tablib/commit/69abfc3ada5d754cb152119c0b4777043657cb6e https://github.com/kennethreitz/tablib/issues/289 -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpR4ueD3pLwC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: gcc 7 is now the default compiler

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 853694 serious Bug #853694 {Done: Robert Luberda } [src:upx-ucl] upx-ucl: ftbfs with GCC-7 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#868956: libmspack: CVE-2017-11423

On 2017-08-06 10:22:11 [+0100], Stuart Caie wrote: > Commited a fix: > https://github.com/kyz/libmspack/commit/17038206fcc384dcee6dd9e3a75f08fd3ddc6a38 > > I'll put out a release in the near future. thank you Stuart. Marc do plan you upload something to unstable/security soon, wait for a new

Bug#750946: Upstream dev of HTML::HTML5::Parser

On 2017-08-05 23:09:11 +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I just noticed https://bugs.debian.org/750946 since my Test::RDF depends on > HTML::HTML5::Parser (though, I don't quite understand how that dependency > arises) and I would be affected by a removal. There doesn't seem to be a dependency.

Bug#853345: cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-7

a work around can be found at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332177358/cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-4.3build1_20061220+dfsg3-4.3ubuntu1.diff.gz

Bug#870850: marked as pending

tag 870850 pending thanks Hello, Bug #870850 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-pkg-config.git/commit/?id=6f56abd --- commit

Processed: Bug#870850 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 870850 pending Bug #870850 [src:ruby-pkg-config] ruby-pkg-config FTBFS: Failure: test_libs_only_l(PkgConfigTest) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 870850:

Processed: Re: Bug#870895: gcc-7: libobjc-7-dev--cross: broken symlink: /usr/lib/gcc-cross//7/libobjc_gc.so -> ../../../..//lib/libobjc_gc.so.4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #870895 [src:gcc-7] gcc-7: libobjc-7-dev--cross: broken symlink: /usr/lib/gcc-cross//7/libobjc_gc.so -> ../../../..//lib/libobjc_gc.so.4 Added tag(s) pending. > severity -1 important Bug #870895 [src:gcc-7] gcc-7: libobjc-7-dev--cross: broken

Bug#870895: gcc-7: libobjc-7-dev--cross: broken symlink: /usr/lib/gcc-cross//7/libobjc_gc.so -> ../../../..//lib/libobjc_gc.so.4

Control: tags -1 + pending Control: severity -1 important pending upload, downgrading the severity because it is not used at all for package builds. On 06.08.2017 02:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source: gcc-7 > Version: 7.1.0-11 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags:

Bug#870772: marked as done (libgsl misses some breaks/replaces)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 15:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870772: fixed in gsl 2.4+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #870772, regarding libgsl misses some breaks/replaces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#853702: voxbo: ftbfs with GCC-7

a workaround is to build with -fpermissive. see http://launchpadlibrarian.net/332155994/voxbo_1.8.5~svn1246-2build4_1.8.5~svn1246-2ubuntu1.diff.gz

Bug#869856: openssl: FTBFS: Testsuite failures

On 5 August 2017 23:31:33 CEST, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >I planned to break things by disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1, which I >might upload soon. I guess I can fix that at the same time. Do you intend a transition like we had for SSLv2 removal or do you plan just to disable it? I

Bug#853369: Build issues with ring

Hello, I am having build issues with Ring (which uses dbus-c++) on unstable. It is a bit hard to debug because dbus-c++ currently fails to build because of gcc-7. I suspect that you will have build issues other than gcc-7. I'll be watching this bug closely. Cheers, -- Alexandre Viau

Processed: clang-3.8: incompatible with libstdc++-7-dev

Processing control commands: > block 853620 with -1 Bug #853620 [src:pocl] pocl: ftbfs with GCC-7 853620 was not blocked by any bugs. 853620 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 853620: 871011 -- 853620: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853620 871011:

Bug#871011: clang-3.8: incompatible with libstdc++-7-dev

Package: clang-3.8 Version: 1:3.8.1-24 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster Control: block 853620 with -1 echo '#include ' | clang++-3.8 -c -x c++ - In file included from :1: In file included from /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.1.0/../../../../include/c++/7.1.0/cstdlib:77:

Bug#853439: marked as done (hachu: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 17:04:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853439: fixed in hachu 0.21-7-g1c1f14a-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #853439, regarding hachu: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#871017: [Pkg-emacsen-addons] Bug#871017: weechat-el FTBFS: No such file or directory, org.el

Adrian Bunk writes: > Source: weechat-el > Version: 0.3.1-1 > Severity: serious > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/weechat-el.html The fix has been uploaded at the very same time I receive this message. [...] > Installing emacs25-el fixes

Bug#871027: mudlet FTBFS on 32bit: error: size of array 'st_check_for_sizeof_st_index_t' is negative

Source: mudlet Version: 1:3.3.1-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mudlet=sid ... In file included from ../3rdparty/edbee-lib/vendor/onig/regint.h:923:0, from ../3rdparty/edbee-lib/vendor/onig/regparse.h:33, from

Bug#870841: marked as done (obs-server: fails to install: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/obsscheduler@i586.service': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:56:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#870841: fixed in open-build-service 2.7.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #870841, regarding obs-server: fails to install: ln: failed to create symbolic link

Bug#853337: marked as done (booth: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:49:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853337: fixed in booth 1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #853337, regarding booth: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: design-desktop-graphics: Please replace gcolor2 with gpick

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #869155 [src:debian-design] design-desktop-graphics: Please replace gcolor2 with gpick Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist' -- 869155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869155 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#869360: slic3r: diff for NMU version 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1

Control: tags 869360 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for slic3r (versioned as 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :'

Processed: slic3r: diff for NMU version 1.2.9+dfsg-6.1

Processing control commands: > tags 869360 + pending Bug #869360 [slic3r] slic3r: missing dependency on perlapi-* Added tag(s) pending. -- 869360: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869360 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#871162: carrotsearch-hppc: FTBFS: ERROR Plugin org.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin:1.8 or one of its dependencies could not be resolved: Cannot access central (https://repo.maven.apache.or

Source: carrotsearch-hppc Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#871149: camitk: FTBFS: vcl_compiler.h:79:4: error: #error "Dunno about this gcc"

Source: camitk Version: 4.0.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#871152: otb: FTBFS: vcl_compiler.h:79:4: error: #error "Dunno about this gcc"

Source: otb Version: 6.0.0+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd >

Bug#871151: eztrace: FTBFS: ../../../src/core/../pptrace/arch/x86_64/hijack.c:62:49: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'disassembler'

Source: eztrace Version: 1.1-5-5 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#871157: openni2: FTBFS: Device.cpp:370:16: error: 'bCloseRange' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

Source: openni2 Version: 2.2.0.33+dfsg-8 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++

Bug#871156: pyfits: FTBFS: cc1: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat [-Werror=format-security]

Source: pyfits Version: 1:3.4-4 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#871165: ros-ros-comm: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named yaml

Source: ros-ros-comm Version: 1.12.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#871148: maven-clean-plugin: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/clean/CleanMojoTest.java:[317,13] cannot find symbol

Source: maven-clean-plugin Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#871138: vcdimager: FTBFS: iso9660.h:277:45: error: flexible array member 'iso9660_dir_s::filename' not at end of 'struct iso9660_pvd_s'

Source: vcdimager Version: 0.7.24+dfsg-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#871153: libqb: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j16 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Source: libqb Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]:

Bug#871154: lxqt-config: FTBFS: selectwnd.h:26:10: fatal error: ui_selectwnd.h: No such file or directory

Source: lxqt-config Version: 0.11.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#871161: scummvm: FTBFS: cc1plus: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat [-Werror=format-security]

Source: scummvm Version: 1.9.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#871170: openfst: FTBFS: ./../include/fst/replace.h:1198:57: error: expected ';' before '::' token

Source: openfst Version: 1.5.3+r3-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash

Bug#871163: reposurgeon: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: make -j16 check returned exit code 2

Source: reposurgeon Version: 3.42-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#871166: dadadodo: FTBFS: cc1: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat [-Werror=format-security]

Source: dadadodo Version: 1.04-6 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -c -I.

Bug#871164: bppphyview: FTBFS: TreeDocument.h:47:10: fatal error: Bpp/Phyl/Io.all: No such file or directory

Source: bppphyview Version: 0.3.0-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#871167: ros-std-msgs: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named yaml

Source: ros-std-msgs Version: 0.5.11-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#871155: brltty: FTBFS: cc1: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat [-Werror=format-security]

Source: brltty Version: 5.4-7 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -shared

Bug#871217: openzwave-controlpanel: FTBFS with GCC-7: error: -Wformat-security ignored without -Wformat

Source: openzwave-controlpanel Version: 0.2a+git20161006.a390f35-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid buster User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-7 openzwave-controlpanel FTBFS since GCC-7 was made the default compiler: g++ -g -O2

Bug#851710: marked as done (zoneminder: CVE-2016-10140)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:40:09 -0400 with message-id <1502066409.4042469.1065047896.1dfcf...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: zoneminder: CVE-2016-10140 has caused the Debian Bug report #851710, regarding zoneminder: CVE-2016-10140 to be marked as done. This means

  1   2   3   4   >