Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bts housekeeping
> tags 899525 + experimental
Failed to alter tags of Bug 899525: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
> notfixed 918328 0.8.11-3+b1
Bug #918328 {Done: Axel Beckert } [aptitude] aptitude: symbol
lookup error: aptitude:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 866960 + buster-ignore
Bug #866960 [libfreetype6] libfreetype6: ABI/API change yielding a blank line
between characters due to different rounding for TrueType fonts
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On 2019-02-18 22:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Let's get it out of buster ... but keep it in sid for now.
>
> Out of interest, why is this kept in sid? Unstable also has 1.20 since
> May of last year.
To provide support for newer kernels from stretch-backports. Since the
package is not in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 717636 + buster-ignore
Bug #717636 [texlive-lang-other] [latex-sanskrit] Package contain type1
startlock fragment from black book
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 908137 + buster-ignore
Bug #908137 [src:luajit] luajit: lightuserdata problem with > 47 bit address
space on arm64
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
908137:
Control: tags -1 buster-ignore
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:41:10PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 11:00:40 -0500, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with the library in question but the problem
> > appears to be specific to these __atomic_xyz builtins which seem
> > to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 buster-ignore
Bug #907277 [autoconf] autoconf: AC_SEARCH_LIBS for __atomic_foo fails with
AC_LANG([C++]) and g++-8
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
--
907277: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907277
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # unreproducible
> severity 917267 important
Bug #917267 [glx-diversions] glx-diversions cannot be uninstalled
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
917267:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # builds on buildd - fixed in experimental so should be ok for bullseye
> tags 816640 + buster-ignore
Bug #816640 {Done: Cédric Boutillier }
[src:ruby-eventmachine] ruby-eventmachine: FTBFS under pbuilder with
USENETWORK=no: TestResolver fails
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 08:24:12PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> LLVM includes ConvertUTF, which has a non free license. See #823100,
> #900596, etc. Files affected are:
>
> lib/Support/ConvertUTF.cpp
> include/llvm/Support/ConvertUTF.h
It seems unicode released their code with a new
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 924061 grave
Bug #924061 [ceph-osd] ceph-osd: ceph-volume@.service missing
Bug #923715 [ceph-osd] ceph-osd: missing systemd service in package:
ceph-volume@.service
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
Severity set to 'grave' from
Hi,
if you turn this into a patch I'd volunteer to sponsor the package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:47:58PM -0700, Nye Liu wrote:
> I have received a response from cloudmark and they appear to have fixed the
> issue.
> $ telnet 208.83.139.205 2703
> Trying
Hi Jeremy,
You uploaded a new version of snapd-glib (1.46-1), which is in NEW and
probably not suitable for buster.
The symbols fix seems something that could easily be applied on top of 1.45-1
to fix this bug. Could you do a 1.45-2 upload with just that fix?
Thanks,
Ivo
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 buster-ignore
Bug #918973 [libtss2-udev] udev rules and created user conflict with the one
shipped in trousers package
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
--
918973: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi,
Am 29.03.19 um 16:44 schrieb Francesco P. Lovergine:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 01:49:51PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Hello Francesco,
>>
>> I intend to upgrade proftpd in Jessie to fix the memory leaks and
>> another unrelated issue. I think it would be best to backport the
>> version
Control: tags -1 buster-ignore
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 05:35:18PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Why not? Would you like to coordinate that?
> It seems to me that we need to create another NEW package that contains
> the udev rules.
>
> And then both libtss2 and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 899623 + buster-ignore
Bug #899623 [src:omniorb-dfsg] omniorb-dfsg: Invalid maintainer address
pkg-corba-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
Hi,
Am 29.03.19 um 16:44 schrieb Francesco P. Lovergine:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 01:49:51PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
Hello Francesco,
I intend to upgrade proftpd in Jessie to fix the memory leaks and
another unrelated
Am 05.04.19 um 13:56 schrieb Francesco P. Lovergine:
[...]
> That should be definitively the easiest solutions. Of course 1.3.5e does
> not strictly fix only those three leaks, so that update could be non
> acceptable for a secteam upload.
The security team has marked this issue as no-dsa, so
Hi Ivo,
> The 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-2 upload you mentioned in this bug
I think you are confusing me with someone else here? :)
[…]
> Would you consider uploading a new version disabling this test for now, to fix
> the FTBFS for buster?
Potentially. It's not really "my" package, though; any
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #925431 [ca-certificates-java]
openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java: fails to install in sid
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #925431 in ca-certificates-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:19:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924608: fixed in oggvideotools 0.9.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #924608,
regarding oggvideotools FTBFS in buster. Can't find file for test.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2019 02:45:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917761: fixed in php-monolog 1.24.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #882944,
regarding php-monolog FTBFS with phpunit 6.4.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # old llvm version
> tags 904059 + buster-ignore
Bug #904059 [clang-6.0] clang-6.0: default target on armhf is
armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # control message wasn't processed
> severity 922502 important
Bug #922502 [plasma-desktop] plasma-desktop: regional settings allow do select
system incompatible locales
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing
Hi Chris,
The 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-2 upload you mentioned in this bug never made it to
the archive (and from the git repo, it doesn't look like the changes are
suitable for buster).
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:02:26PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > Locally I cannot reproduce.
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:43:27 +0200
with message-id <20190405144324.c7ufdujdube5u...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: ruby-httpclient FTBFS and Debci failure:
test_verification_without_httpclient fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #882473,
regarding ruby-httpclient FTBFS and
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: tags -1 pending
Can confirm that the patch works, I'm going to preapre a NMU for this.
--
tobi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #923866 [aptly] aptly: unable to delete local repositories
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> tags -1 pending
Bug #923866 [aptly] aptly: unable to delete local repositories
Added tag(s) pending.
--
923866:
Control: tags 923866 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for aptly (versioned as 1.3.0+ds1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru aptly-1.3.0+ds1/debian/changelog aptly-1.3.0+ds1/debian/changelog
---
Processing control commands:
> tags 923866 + pending
Bug #923866 [aptly] aptly: unable to delete local repositories
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #923866 to the same tags previously set
--
923866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tags 882324 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for amavisd-new (versioned as 1:2.11.0-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru amavisd-new-2.11.0/debian/changelog amavisd-new-2.11.0/debian/changelog
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 13:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925431: fixed in ca-certificates-java 20190405
has caused the Debian Bug report #925431,
regarding openjdk-12-jre-headless,ca-certificates-java: fails to install in sid
to be marked as done.
This means
Le 05/04/2019 à 17:05, Sebastian Rasmussen a écrit :
Hi!
I have been attempting to install emscripten today, and ended up the
libstdc++6 breakage.
Next I found this bug and I'm simply wondering what I can do to help
you guys make progress on this bug?
Unfortunately, I'm just a new user of
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:04:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925903: fixed in onionshare 2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #925903,
regarding onionshare: FTBFS in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi No??l
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 02:42:48PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:07:37PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:40:32PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Source: wget
> > > Version: 1.20.1-1
> > >
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.28-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
First, I apologize if I have omitted something. This is my first
attempt to file a bug report.
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Processing control commands:
> tags 882324 + pending
Bug #882324 [amavisd-new] amavisd-new doesn't honor "originating" configuration
flag, contrary to documentation
Added tag(s) pending.
--
882324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 926389 grave
Bug #926389 [src:wget] wget: CVE-2019-5953
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
926389:
[adding 897...@bugs.debian.org to CC]
Hi Ivo,
> > I think you are confusing me with someone else here? :)
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897489#14
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-whoosh/commit/d6b04361fc0a16b836de410acd2e15a1ca225969
>
> Am I
Hi!
I have been attempting to install emscripten today, and ended up the
libstdc++6 breakage.
Next I found this bug and I'm simply wondering what I can do to help
you guys make progress on this bug?
Unfortunately, I'm just a new user of emscripten so I barely know how
to use it once it is
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#897489: fixed in python-whoosh 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #897489,
regarding python-whoosh: FTBFS due to non-deterministic behaviour in
NFA.minimize
to be marked as done.
This
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #897489 in python-whoosh reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #897489 [src:python-whoosh] python-whoosh: FTBFS due to non-deterministic
behaviour in NFA.minimize
Added tag(s) pending.
--
897489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 912035 https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/DRIVERS-575
Bug #912035 [src:pymongo] pymongo: FTBFS due to hardcoded SHA1-based
certificates in testsuite
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/DRIVERS-575'.
> thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 925526 + buster-ignore
Bug #925526 [src:schema2ldif] src:schema2ldif: Invalid maintainer address
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
925526:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:36:49PM +, z...@debian.org wrote:
> Control: tags 919486 + patch
> Control: tags 919486 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for osinfo-db (versioned as 0.20181120-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should
Hello Guenter Grodotzki,
I just tried to help triage that issue.
For some reason you just added the segfault line.
I assume there was one line following starting with "Code:".
Please add that line too when submitting bugs.
As this information is still kind of small, you might consider
to install
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 20:53:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922986: fixed in prometheus-postfix-exporter 0.2.0-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #922986,
regarding Invalid user/group name or numeric ID, ignoring:
systemd-journal,postdrop
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 20:53:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924798: fixed in python-scales 1.0.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #924798,
regarding python-scales: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-tox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Control: tags 919486 + patch
Control: tags 919486 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for osinfo-db (versioned as 0.20181120-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I'm also going to open a PR on salsa.
Cheers,
Chris
diff -Nru
Processing control commands:
> tags 919486 + patch
Bug #919486 [osinfo-db] Please support Debian Buster
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 919486 + pending
Bug #919486 [osinfo-db] Please support Debian Buster
Added tag(s) pending.
--
919486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919486
Hi,
I've rised the severity to grave again. The excuse that it is possible
to use the package without the service is like explaining people they
should use a car without the car keys just because this is possible.
Also I've fixed the bug and uploaded the fix as NMU to delayed-2.
I'll also take
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 18:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924076: fixed in tvtime 1.0.11-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #924076,
regarding tvtime: insecure use of /tmp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 22:16:23 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> libwolfssl was removed from testing due to #918952.
> The shared lib was removed but this package was not, because it
doesn't
> depend on the lib. Maybe the B-D can be safely removed.
Checked, will FTBFS when done…
It will likely
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #925950 [cross-gcc-dev] patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925950: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925950
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Dimo,
> My key situation should be resolved with the next keyring update, but
> this will take a few weeks probably. If it's useful to you, you
should
> push the new package into the archive.
I've uploaded your package to DELAYED/10. Let me know if I should
Hi,
I looked into the issue as it was listing the package for autoremoval.
The issue actually is quite easy as tox made a transition back in
August 2015 (2.1.1-2) that renamed python-tox to tox. This transition
now dropped the transitionals in 3.7.0-1.
There was no bug in python-scales for that
Processing control commands:
> severity 924835 minor
Bug #924835 [src:adacontrol] adacontrol: FTBFS: test tfw_gpr.txt failed
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
--
924835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2019 22:18:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925327: fixed in gpsd 3.17-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #925327,
regarding gpsd: CVE-2018-17937
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: src:adacontrol
Followup-For: Bug #924835
Control: severity 924835 minor
1.20r7-2 disables all build time tests.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #925564 [src:congress] congress: FTBFS: ValueError: Fernet key must be 32
url-safe base64-encoded bytes.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity -1 important
Bug #925564 [src:congress] congress: FTBFS: ValueError: Fernet key must be 32
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:34:19 +0200
with message-id <20190405213417.rg6l2fygkreiu...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#926371: aptitude: FTBFS with gcc 8.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #926371,
regarding aptitude: FTBFS with gcc 8.3
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> tags 919486 - pending
Bug #919486 [osinfo-db] Please support Debian Buster
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
919486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919486
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 919486 - pending
Hi,
* Guido Günther [190405 22:04]:
> If we had stable links for CD images (3813797) this would be different
> but I did not get around to look into this yet so help there would be
> appreciated and would make this fixable for real.
>
> For now it would be cool
Tobias Frost writes:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
>> My key situation should be resolved with the next keyring update, but
>> this will take a few weeks probably. If it's useful to you, you
>> should push the new package into the archive.
>
> I've uploaded your package to DELAYED/10. Let me know
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Hallo Lucas,
on the Salzburg BSP I've tried to reproduce the bug, hoever I could not
reproduce it in a clean pbuilder buster chroot. Maybe this was an
intermediate problem?
--
tob
On 01.04.19 17:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
>> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
>>> Recommends sounds a good idea.
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:12:35PM +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> One of my systems has logged
> rpc.gssd[1168]: WARNING: handle_gssd_upcall: failed to find uid in upcall
> string 'mech=krb5'
>
> This turns out to be a known problem, covered extensively in
>
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #926483 [src:nfs-utils] FTBFS: utils/blkmapd/device-discovery.c:156:
undefined reference to `major'
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #926483 [src:nfs-utils] FTBFS:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Can not be reproduced using local new VM with new cowbuilder, is there maybe
something special in your setup.
Yours,
mauli
Dear Maintainer,
just tried to help triaging this issue.
Seems this is "expected" behaviour with LC_ALL not
set to "C". In the end it leads to this upstream bug:
https://github.com/sirfz/tesserocr/issues/165
It contains some workarounds and more information.
Kind regards,
Bernhard
#
Hi Andreas,
thanks for the upload!
Can you file an unblock request so that the package will migrate?
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:40:37 +0200 Frank Neuber
wrote:
> this bug is fixed in SP13.
> The version in the debian repo is SP9 and quite old.
Hi Frank,
as you are the maintainer of the package: Do you think you can backport
the fix, so that the package can be part of buster?
(It would be great if
Processing control commands:
> serverity -1 important
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #926062 [qbittorrent] qbitorrent crashes, blames QNetworkAccessM
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
926062:
I tried to reproduce this bug but unfortunatly I could not on my
machine... Is there any special with your machine?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 926386 important
Bug #926386 [peek] free(): double free detected in tcache 2
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 926386 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #926386 [peek] free(): double free detected in tcache 2
Added tag(s)
Control: serverity -1 important
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Hi shirish,
I tried to reproduce your SEGV, but here qbittorrent seems to work
fine. Do you have additional informations about how to trigger the
SEGV, like what you are doing to trigger it or like?
Cheers from the
Package: gnome-gmail
Version: 2.5.6-1
Severity: Serious
If GNOME Gmail is used to "Send To..." on a file via Nautilus, the
resulting uploaded message is not rendered properly - not showing the
Subject or attached file. It is not possible to send the message that
is opened.
This happens because
Source: gitlab
Version: 11.8.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for gitlab, fixed
upstream in the 11.9.4, 11.8.6, and 11.7.10 releases.
CVE-2018-5158[0]:
| The PDF viewer does not sufficiently sanitize
Source: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.3.4-2.4
Severity: serious
The package fails to build from source (actually current Git branch
debian/sid, but that has no changes that I could imagine causing this)
in a clean sid chroot on amd64:
/usr/bin/ld: device-discovery.o: in function `bl_add_disk':
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 06:43:20 +0200
with message-id <34c069a3-16a1-ecf3-4f6c-1ab04be80...@debian.org>
and subject line apport was removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #894908,
regarding apport: FTBFS during binary-arch build: Java not available
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 06:43:20 +0200
with message-id <34c069a3-16a1-ecf3-4f6c-1ab04be80...@debian.org>
and subject line apport was removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #876683,
regarding apport: FTBFS: Could not determine system package manager. Copy
appropriate
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 06:43:20 +0200
with message-id <34c069a3-16a1-ecf3-4f6c-1ab04be80...@debian.org>
and subject line apport was removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #924692,
regarding apport: /var/crash/.lock created insecurely
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 06:43:20 +0200
with message-id <34c069a3-16a1-ecf3-4f6c-1ab04be80...@debian.org>
and subject line apport was removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #924693,
regarding apport: /var/crash/.lock is world-writable
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:53:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926487: fixed in gnome-gmail 2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #926487,
regarding GNOME Gmail incompatibilty with Gmail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:39:23 +0200
with message-id <307a4dc7-04f0-5715-553e-9dcf3d4f5...@debian.org>
and subject line kfreebsd-8 has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #768106,
regarding kfreebsd-8: CVE-2014-8476: getlogin kernel memory disclosure
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:39:23 +0200
with message-id <307a4dc7-04f0-5715-553e-9dcf3d4f5...@debian.org>
and subject line kfreebsd-8 has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #748743,
regarding kfreebsd-8: triple fault on execve from 64-bit thread to 32-bit
process
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:39:11 +0200
with message-id <5e1c6c15-a00f-d2db-750e-6b70d950a...@debian.org>
and subject line kfreebsd-9 has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #796997,
regarding kfreebsd-9: CVE-2015-5675: IRET privilege escalation
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:39:23 +0200
with message-id <307a4dc7-04f0-5715-553e-9dcf3d4f5...@debian.org>
and subject line kfreebsd-8 has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #779202,
regarding kfreebsd-8: CVE-2015-1414: DoS via IGMP packet
to be marked as done.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:33:24PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> thanks for the upload!
> Can you file an unblock request so that the package will migrate?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926435
It was even unblocked now. :-)
--
http://fam-tille.de
92 matches
Mail list logo
