Bug#940007: marked as done (gitlab: CVE-2019-16170: Project Template Functionality Could Be Used to Access Restricted Project Data)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:49:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#940007: fixed in gitlab 12.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #940007, regarding gitlab: CVE-2019-16170: Project Template Functionality Could Be Used to Access Restricted Project Data to be marked as

Processed: Help needed for medical imaging framework sofa (Was: Bug#875184: [sofa-framework] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #875184 [src:sofa-framework] [sofa-framework] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) help. -- 875184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-j...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-j...@lists.debian.org (was ebo...@apache.org). > usertag 915291 + default-java11 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: default-java11. > retitle 915291 java3ds-fileloader: FTBFS

Bug#940076: marked as done (Keyexchange with firefox not working)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:03:37 +0200 with message-id <1b08b4fade943754812e304024c1cc2d471b8677.camel@jff.email> and subject line Re: Keyexchange with firefox not working has caused the Debian Bug report #940076, regarding Keyexchange with firefox not working to be marked as done.

Bug#935290: moar digging

On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:21:24 +0200 Robert Lemmen wrote: > ...and it's fakeroot! it does ld_preload to map file user ids, and doing > that it fakes stat calls, but not statx! > > regards robert > > -- > Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com Does rakudo build

Bug#915291: marked as pending in java3ds-fileloader

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #915291 in java3ds-fileloader reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#915291 marked as pending in java3ds-fileloader

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #915291 [src:java3ds-fileloader] java3ds-fileloader: FTBFS with Java 11 due to Applet API removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 915291: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#875184: Help needed for medical imaging framework sofa (Was: Bug#875184: [sofa-framework] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Control: tags -1 help On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 08:41:40AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 10:43:53PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > The current releases on https://github.com/sofa-framework

Bug#934961: marked as done (insserv breaks startpar autopkgtest)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:51:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934961: fixed in startpar 0.64-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #934961, regarding insserv breaks startpar autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Processed: Re: Bug#940087: FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python3-dbus 1.2.10-1 Bug #940087 [src:libsecret] FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist Bug reassigned from package 'src:libsecret' to 'python3-dbus'. No longer marked as found

Bug#912230: marked as done (drmips FTBFS with OpenJDK 11)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:41:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912230: fixed in drmips 2.0.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912230, regarding drmips FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#912391: marked as done (segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:21:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#912391: fixed in segment 1.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #912391, regarding segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#940087: FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist

Control: reassign -1 python3-dbus 1.2.10-1 Control: affects -1 + src:libsecret Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 09:34:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > ** > > ERROR:libsecret/test-prompt.c:239:test_perform_vanish: assertion failed > > (error == NULL): Method "Prompt" with

Bug#940092: flowblade does start

Hi Theodore What does which flowblade say for you? Mine says /usr/bin/flowblade and starts pretty much normal. Best,

Bug#915291: marked as done (java3ds-fileloader: FTBFS with Java 11 due to Applet API removal)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:48:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#915291: fixed in java3ds-fileloader 1.2+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #915291, regarding java3ds-fileloader: FTBFS with Java 11 due to Applet API removal to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#939937: Acknowledgement (Remotely exploitable null pointer dereference bug)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:36:03PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > I committed my patch to libapreq's Subversion repository: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1866760 Thanks! I'll make an upload to unstable when I get the time, but I guess the security team should do one for stable.

Bug#940088: gimp: crashes on opening exsisting or creating new image

Package: gimp Version: 2.10.8-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Starting GIMP and opening a jpg,png or xcf File. Alternatively creating a new File via File -> New ... -> OK * What exactly did you do (or not do)

Bug#940087: FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist

Source: libsecret Version: 0.18.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) During build-time tests, for example in and

Bug#912391: marked as pending in segment

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #912391 in segment reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#912391 marked as pending in segment

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #912391 [src:segment] segment: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXB removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 912391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912391 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#940092: flowblade doesn't start

Package: flowblade Version: 2.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I installed flowblade, and then tried to start it. It failed to start; I expected it to start and be usable. :-) % flowblade FLOWBLADE MOVIE EDITOR 2.2 -- Launch

Bug#940085: plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot installation lacks the requested driver: xwin

Source: plplot, gnudatalanguage Control: found -1 plplot/5.15.0+dfsg-3 Control: found -1 gnudatalanguage/0.9.9-10 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainers, With a recent upload of

Processed: plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot installation lacks the requested driver: xwin

Processing control commands: > found -1 plplot/5.15.0+dfsg-3 Bug #940085 [src:plplot, src:gnudatalanguage] plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot installation lacks the requested driver: xwin Marked as found in versions plplot/5.15.0+dfsg-3. > found -1 gnudatalanguage/0.9.9-10 Bug

Bug#940087: marked as done (FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:49:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#940087: fixed in dbus-python 1.2.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #940087, regarding FTBFS: test-prompt: Method "Prompt" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Prompt" doesn't exist to

Bug#893301: marked as done (logisim FTBFS with openjdk-9)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#893301: fixed in logisim 2.7.1~dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #893301, regarding logisim FTBFS with openjdk-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#940026: marked as done (gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:47:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#940026: fixed in gvfs 1.42.0+really1.38.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #940026, regarding gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas to be marked as done. This means

Bug#934841: marked as done (sshpubkeys: (build-)depends on cruft package.)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:50:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934841: fixed in sshpubkeys 3.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #934841, regarding sshpubkeys: (build-)depends on cruft package. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: blockdiag: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #936219 [src:blockdiag] blockdiag: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 936219: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936219 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#940107: python3-webpy: Does not work with static content

Control: severity -1 normal Robin, thanks for your bug report! I'm using web.py myself, behind an nginx frontend. In my case, static content is served by nginx, which is probably the most common case. For special cases, I use custom code for serving static files. Therefore, I never realized,

Processed: Re: Bug#940107: python3-webpy: Does not work with static content

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #940107 [python3-webpy] python3-webpy: Does not work with static content Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' -- 940107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#939899: [ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: apitrace_8.0+repack-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters - From: Debian FTP Masters To: amd64 Build Daemon Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:04:04 + Subject: apitrace_8.0+repack-1_amd64.changes REJECTED apitrace-tracers_8.0+repack-1_amd64.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing source package

Processed: Bug#940026 marked as pending in gvfs

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #940026 [src:gvfs] gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas Added tag(s) pending. -- 940026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940026 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#940105: linux: serious corruption issue with btrfs

Source: linux Version: 5.2.9-2 Severity: critical Tags: upstream patch Justification: causes serious data loss Hi. There were some reports over the last weeks from users on linux-btrfs which suffered from catastrophic btrfs corruption. The bug which is apparently a regression introduced in 5.2

Bug#940026: marked as pending in gvfs

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #940026 in gvfs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#940119: sdaps build-depends on package that is cruft in unstable and gone in testing.

Package: sdaps Version: 1.9.7-0.1 Severity: serious sdaps build-depends on texlive-generic-recommended which is no longer built by texlive-base. The old texlive-generic-recommended is still present in unstable as a cruft package, but is completely gone from testing. Please update your

Bug#940026: marked as done (gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:57:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#940026: fixed in gvfs 1.42.0+really1.42.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #940026, regarding gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas to be marked as done. This means

Bug#938962: user-mode-linux needs update for new linux

Hi, I am not sure if this has been reported upstream but with libpcap 1.9, user mode linux fails to build. The build failure happens with both, 5.2 and 4.19 LTS kernels. A much detailed report is available at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938962 libpcap 1.9 introduces

Processed: Bug#934841 marked as pending in sshpubkeys

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #934841 [sshpubkeys] sshpubkeys: (build-)depends on cruft package. Added tag(s) pending. -- 934841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934841 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#934841: marked as pending in sshpubkeys

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #934841 in sshpubkeys reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#940026: marked as pending in gvfs

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #940026 in gvfs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#940026 marked as pending in gvfs

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #940026 [src:gvfs] gvfs: unbuildable in unstable: requires experimental gsettings-desktop-schemas Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #940026 to the same tags previously set -- 940026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940026

Bug#938962: user-mode-linux needs update for new linux

On 12/09/2019 13:14, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Hi, I am not sure if this has been reported upstream but with libpcap 1.9, user mode linux fails to build. The build failure happens with both, 5.2 and 4.19 LTS kernels. A much detailed report is available at:

Processed: limit source to ubuntu-dev-tools, tagging 940040

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source ubuntu-dev-tools Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'ubuntu-dev-tools' Limit currently set to 'source':'ubuntu-dev-tools' > tags 940040 + pending Bug #940040 [src:ubuntu-dev-tools] ubuntu-dev-tools:

Bug#940106: python3-webpy: Does not work with static content

Package: python3-webpy Version: 1:0.39+20181101-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, python3-webpy cannot serve static content due to upstream bugs that have since been fixed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.1 APT prefers stable

Bug#940108: nexus: FTBFS with GCC 9: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'mxml_node_t' error

Source: nexus Version: 4.3.2-svn1921-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source With the Java 9 fix applied (#893383) nexus still fails to build, I assume due to more strict checks by GCC 9: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc

Bug#939687: clazy: FTBFS on armel: undefined reference to symbol '__atomic_load_4@@LIBATOMIC_1.0'

On 19/09/07 08:58, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: clazy > Version: 1.5-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dear maintainer, > > During a binNMU of clazy during the llvm-defaults transition, you package > FTBFS > on armel. Can you please

Processed: skimage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Severity 938494 serious Bug #938494 [src:skimage] skimage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938494:

Processed: re: gnumed-client: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 936630 serious Bug #936630 [src:gnumed-client] gnumed-client: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 936630:

Processed: re: Please replace with a python3 module or remove the package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 782951 serious Bug #782951 [python-pyramid-tm] Please replace with a python3 module or remove the package Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: re: python-aws-xray-sdk: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937593 serious Bug #937593 [src:python-aws-xray-sdk] python-aws-xray-sdk: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 937593:

Processed: ghostscript makes c2esp autopkgtest timeout

Processing control commands: > found -1 ghostscript/9.28~~rc2~dfsg-1 Bug #940127 [src:ghostscript, src:c2esp] ghostscript makes c2esp autopkgtest timeout Marked as found in versions ghostscript/9.28~~rc2~dfsg-1. > found -1 c2esp/27-4 Bug #940127 [src:ghostscript, src:c2esp] ghostscript makes

Bug#940127: ghostscript makes c2esp autopkgtest timeout

Source: ghostscript, c2esp Control: found -1 ghostscript/9.28~~rc2~dfsg-1 Control: found -1 c2esp/27-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update timeout Dear maintainers, With a recent upload of

Bug#939620: marked as done (python3-zope.testrunner: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-zope.testrunner)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:49:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939620: fixed in zope.testrunner 4.4.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #939620, regarding python3-zope.testrunner: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-zope.testrunner to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#939561: soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable

tags 939561 +fixed-upstream tags 939561 +patch thanks Some googling revealed that upstream had fixed this issue https://github.com/pothosware/SoapyBladeRF/pull/19 . I was able to take the upstream pull request, turn it into a patch series and apply it to the Debian package. I have uploaded

Processed: re: python-repoze.tm2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 938133 serious Bug #938133 [src:python-repoze.tm2] python-repoze.tm2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938133:

Processed: re: pyramid-jinja2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937518 serious Bug #937518 [src:pyramid-jinja2] pyramid-jinja2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Bug #935380 [src:pyramid-jinja2] Please drop the Python 2 subpackage Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Severity set to 'serious' from

Processed: spyder-kernels: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Severity 938551 serious Bug #938551 [src:spyder-kernels] spyder-kernels: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938551:

Processed: re: soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 939561 +fixed-upstream Bug #939561 [src:soapybladerf] soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > tags 939561 +patch Bug #939561 [src:soapybladerf] soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping

Processed: re: python-pyramid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 938089 serious Bug #938089 [src:python-pyramid] python-pyramid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938089:

Bug#938919: zope.testrunner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

On 12.09.19 19:34, peter green wrote: severity 938919 serious thanks python-zope.testrunner in testing depends on python-zope.exceptions which has already been dropped by the zope.exceptions source package. This has been addressed in unstable by dropping the python-zope.testrunner binary

Bug#932865: python-qrtools: not installable: depends on python2 version of zbar

Hi all, Unfortunately, I'm still using this app. Or not me cause I can use command line, but I must keep this app running otherwise I'll be in trouble. So I propose a merge request to the upstream that ports this app to python3.

Processed: spyder: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Severity 938550 serious Bug #938550 [src:spyder] spyder: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938550:

Bug#939974: osmo-trx FTBFS: undefined reference to symbol '_ZN5boost6system16generic_categoryEv'

Hi, sorry for late response regarding this topic in here. Related osmocom ticket can be found here: https://osmocom.org/issues/4182 As I mentioned in last comments of that ticket, I think the build failure in testing and unstable (building fine in stable) comes from the fact that this patch

Bug#940085: marked as done (plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot installation lacks the requested driver: xwin)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:48:19 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot installation lacks the requested driver: xwin has caused the Debian Bug report #940085, regarding plplot breaks gnudatalanguage autopkgtest: PLplot

Processed: zope.testrunner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 938919 serious Bug #938919 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:zope.testrunner] zope.testrunner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#939620: zope.testrunner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

severity 938919 serious thanks python-zope.testrunner in testing depends on python-zope.exceptions which has already been dropped by the zope.exceptions source package. This has been addressed in unstable by dropping the python-zope.testrunner binary package, however that fix cannot currently

Bug#940130: pymca: testsuite failure (segfault)

Source: pymca Version: 5.5.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Hello, looks like the package autopkgtest is failing... testFastFitEdfMap (PyMcaBatchTest.testPyMcaBatch) ... Segmentation fault https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pymca/testing/amd64 can you please have a look?

Bug#875066: [ofono-phonesim] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:13:00PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: ofono-phonesim > Version: 1.20-1 > Severity: wishlist > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qt4-removal > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 > as

Bug#874907: [hydrogen] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:01:50 +0200 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream > > The current upstream beta release supports Qt5. > https://github.com/hydrogen-music/hydrogen/releases/tag/1.0.0-beta1 I'll see if I can tackle it during the weekend.

Bug#874911: [hamfax] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 09:33:12PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:05:57PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > Source: hamfax > > > > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 > > as [announced] in: > > > > In

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:57:09PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: amora-server > Version: 1.2~svn+git2015.04.25-1 > Severity: wishlist > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qt4-removal > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to

Bug#940130: pymca: testsuite failure (segfault)

Hello, this is a probleme due to a bug in python-numpy which is already solved in python-numpy 1.6.5 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933056 Cheers De : debian-science-maintainers

Bug#939596: marked as done (python3-ndg-httpsclient: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/ndg_httpclient', which is also in package python-ndg-httpsclient 0.5.1-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:40:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939596: fixed in ndg-httpsclient 0.5.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #939596, regarding python3-ndg-httpsclient: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/ndg_httpclient', which is also in package

Bug#874931: [karlyriceditor] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:20:58PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Source: karlyriceditor > > > > > > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 > > as [announced] in: > > > > [announced] > >

Processed: Re: hdup: ftbfs with GCC-9

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch pending Bug #925711 [src:hdup] hdup: ftbfs with GCC-9 Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 925711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925711 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#940138: linux-image-5.2.0-2-amd64: panic in pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources

Package: src:linux Version: 5.2.9-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? aptitude upgrade && aptitude update && reboot * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? booting into

Bug#940139: nautilus: open files by double clicking or right click "open"

Package: nautilus Version: 3.30.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: must Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? *

Bug#940137: openmama: FTBFS with Java 10 due to javah removal

Source: openmama Version: 2.2.2.1-11.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java10 openmama fails to build with Java 10 due to the removal of javah: headers:

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Hi Moritz Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > there's been no movement on https://github.com/amora/amora/issues/86 for the > last 11 months Yes, IIRC it was like compiling but not yet really working again. Will have to check. I'm though currently busy with the Python 2 to 3 migration in WICD (which

Bug#875066: [ofono-phonesim] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:12:18PM +0200, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > Hello, > > Missatge de Moritz Mühlenhoff del dia dj., 12 de set. > 2019 a les 22:30: > > > Are you planning to port it to Qt5 yourself or shall we remove it from > > the archive? > > Let's remove it from the archive. Ack,

Bug#874907: [hydrogen] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 17:37, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:01:50 +0200 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream > > > > The current upstream beta release supports Qt5. > >

Bug#925711: hdup: ftbfs with GCC-9

control: tags -1 patch pending On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:00:29 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, please try again, looks like you need a quilt format if you want to > add a patch > > attached an updated diff > > G. in deferred/2 diff -u hdup-2.0.14/debian/changelog

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:mariadb-10.3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:mariadb-10.3 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Bug#940131: srslte FTBFS with libbladerf2 and uhd 3.14

Package: srslte Version: 3.14.1.0-2 Severity: serious srslte FTBFS in bullseye and sid due to the new versions of bladerf and uhd changing some data types. I patched the errors and was able to get a successful build in raspbian bullseye which I uploaded to the raspbian archive, I have not

Processed: tagging 939819, affects 939819

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 939819 + upstream Bug #939819 [src:mariadb-10.3] mariadb-10.3: Replication hangs with "preparing" and never starts Added tag(s) upstream. > affects 939819 + release.debian.org Bug #939819 [src:mariadb-10.3] mariadb-10.3: Replication hangs

Processed: severity of 939866 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 939866 serious Bug #939866 [mariadb-server-10.1] mariadb-server-10.1: replication hangs in state "Slave_IO_Running: Preparing" after upgrade from 10.1.38 to 10.1.41 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#875066: [ofono-phonesim] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Hello, Missatge de Moritz Mühlenhoff del dia dj., 12 de set. 2019 a les 22:30: > Are you planning to port it to Qt5 yourself or shall we remove it from > the archive? Let's remove it from the archive. Regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.

Bug#939662: 回复: Bug#939662 closed by Stephen Kitt (Re: Bug#939662: sys/mman.h not found)

On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 01:53:54 +, Zhang Hao wrote: > Even though I use the parameter "--host=x86_64-w64-32", the gperftools > makefile dos not passed. And The gperftools support "mingw-w64" to cross > compile on linux. You can find it on > "https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools/issues/878;.

Bug#939768: gimp: After the last upgrade, GIMP crashes when creating a new image or opening an existing one.

I tried upgrading gegl, libgegl-0.4-0, and libgegl-common to : gegl (0.4.14-1+b2) libspiro1 (1:20190731-1+b1)<== brought in by upgrading gegl libgegl-0.4-0 (0.4.12-2 => 0.4.14-1+b2) libgegl-common (0.4.12-2 => 0.4.14-1) I run testing but also have unstable pined to a lower priorty than

Bug#939561: soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:42:53PM +0100, peter green wrote: > tags 939561 +fixed-upstream > tags 939561 +patch > thanks > > Some googling revealed that upstream had fixed this issue > https://github.com/pothosware/SoapyBladeRF/pull/19 . I was able to take the > upstream pull request, turn it

Bug#866122: kernel resolution

For reference: While debugging this very tricky problem, our kernel team found 2 separate but related bugs whose resolutions fix the problem outlined in this report. The bug fixes both resulted in CVEs and have already been added to Linus' tree. They are:

Bug#939561: marked as done (soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:35:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939561: fixed in soapybladerf 0.3.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #939561, regarding soapybladerf ftbfs in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#853594: marked as done (openmama: ftbfs with GCC-7)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#853594: fixed in openmama 2.2.2.1-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #853594, regarding openmama: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#940137: marked as done (openmama: FTBFS with Java 10 due to javah removal)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 22:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#940137: fixed in openmama 2.2.2.1-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #940137, regarding openmama: FTBFS with Java 10 due to javah removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#940130: marked as done (pymca: testsuite failure (segfault))

Your message dated Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:42 +0800 with message-id and subject line RE:Bug#940130: pymca: testsuite failure (segfault) has caused the Debian Bug report #940130, regarding pymca: testsuite failure (segfault) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: retitle 939529 to RM: gtg -- RoM; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no rdeps ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 939529 RM: gtg -- RoM; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no > rdeps Bug #939529 [src:gtg] gtg: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: gtg -- RoM; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no rdeps' from 'gtg:

Processed: retitle 939531 to RM: medit -- RoQA; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no rdeps ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 939531 RM: medit -- RoQA; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no > rdeps Bug #939531 [src:medit] medit: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: medit -- RoQA; python2-only; dead upstream; low popcon; no rdeps'

Bug#939939: marked as done (libterm-choose-perl: testsuite failures)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:08:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939939: fixed in libterm-choose-perl 1.701-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #939939, regarding libterm-choose-perl: testsuite failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#939303: marked as done (matplotlib2: FTBFS unsatisfied b-d on python-pyshp)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:18:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939303: fixed in matplotlib2 2.2.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #939303, regarding matplotlib2: FTBFS unsatisfied b-d on python-pyshp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#940138: linux-image-5.2.0-2-amd64: panic in pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources

Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 23:36 +0200, Kendy Kutzner wrote: [...] > ** PCI devices: > [...] Since the panic occurs during PCI initialisation, this is likely to be very relevant. However more detail than the default list may be needed. Can

  1   2   >