forwarded 934047 https://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16240
thanks
Le 06/08/2019 à 14:11, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Package: scilab
Version: 6.0.1-10
Severity: important
Hello,
Currently, scilab FTBFS with OCaml 4.08.x because it depends on the num
library that used to be shipped with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 934047 https://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16240
Bug #934047 [scilab] scilab: please add libnum-ocaml-dev to Build-Depends
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16240'.
> thanks
Stopping
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #944199 [exim4] exim4: dsearch in config end up in exim4 panic
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> forwared -1 https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
944199:
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 17:07:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944309: fixed in pslib 0.4.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #944309,
regarding pslib: FTBFS on all autobuilders: configure.ac:45: error: possibly
undefined macro: AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 944199 https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465
Bug #944199 [exim4] exim4: dsearch in config end up in exim4 panic
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hello,
On Wed 06 Nov 2019 at 08:53PM -05, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi Olaf and Dima,
>
> Dima, if it's alright with you can I please take care of this bug?
> I've head I need an RC Bug NMU process for the "demonstrates skills
> and knowledge of process" section of my eventual DD application.
Christoph Berg wrote:
> > According to Andreas Beckmann, coreutils 8.30 is in the process of
> > being ported to stretch.
[…]
> I'm not sure if that means that backport is really going to appear in
> stretch-backports.
That is my reading of it too. Felix, can we drop this requirement on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 944060 https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
Bug #944060 [src:exim4] exim4-daemon-light: FTBFS (testsuite error) on mipsel
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464'.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #885498 [zenmap] zenmap: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
Added tag(s) pending.
--
885498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885498
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941525: fixed in gnu-standards 2010.03.11-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #941525,
regarding gnu-standards: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete
texlive-generic-recommended
to be marked as
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:33 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if that means that backport is really going to appear in
> > stretch-backports.
>
> That is my reading of it too. Felix, can we drop this requirement on
> coreutils for the time being? (I'm afraid I wasn't following the
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #885498 in nmap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Felix,
> Yes, we probably can but I would like to understand, please, why
> coreutils 8.30 (which, according to Andreas Beckmann, builds cleanly
> in stretch) cannot find its way into stretch-bpo.
Backporting such a big package (with likely lots of other changes)
does not seem particularly
Re: Felix Lechner 2019-11-06
> According to Andreas Beckmann, coreutils 8.30 is in the process of
> being ported to stretch.
Thanks for the feedback.
> For details, please have a look at the PS here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943910#25
I'm not sure if that
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939963: fixed in orpie 1.5.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #939963,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.08.0 (num)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2019 07:35:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944307: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #885273,
regarding diffuse: Depends on unmaintained pygtk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2019 07:37:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944283: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #942203,
regarding postbooks: fails to comply with the DFSG
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2019 07:35:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944307: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #942971,
regarding diffuse: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
I've just release a pre-version of 1.1.0 for MacOs. I'll work in the next
week to correct the package and will provide a Debian package ASAP after
this...
Thanks
Le lun. 28 oct. 2019 à 23:50, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I'll do so once I'm back from vacation.
> Its a shame that Eric does
Am 7. November 2019 23:19:51 MEZ schrieb Felix Lechner
:
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>>
>> I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
>> his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate?
>
>Unfortunately, I can only speculate that he meant to
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:33:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942193: fixed in dwz 0.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #942193,
regarding dwz: dh_dwz freecad build regression: write_die: Assertion `value &&
refdcu->cu_kind != CU_ALT' failed.
to be marked as done.
Package: rpki-trust-anchors
Version: 20191019-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:18:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#933364: fixed in lua-geoip 0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #933364,
regarding lua-geoip depends on cruft package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:21:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944305: fixed in rpki-trust-anchors 20191019-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #944305,
regarding rpki-trust-anchors: fails to purge: rmdir: failed to remove
'/etc/tals/': No such file or directory
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 944053 - moreinfo
Bug #944053 {Done: Andreas Beckmann }
[nvidia-legacy-390xx-kernel-dkms] nvidia-legacy-390xx-kernel-dkms: Unable to
build the driver
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> reassign 944262 wnpp
Bug #944262 [adios2] ITP: adios2 -- The
Source: pslib
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hello,
the latest upload did not build:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pslib=arm64=0.4.6-1=1573122104=0
dh build-arch
Re: Felix Lechner 2019-11-07
> Also, as a side note, would someone please explain why someone still
> on stretch would need lintian? I am personally on stable, but most
> package maintainers out there seem to track testing or the bleeding
> edge, unstable.
sbuild recently started running
Your message dated Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:39:01 +0100
with message-id <20191107203901.igkobzsuqflt7...@p1otr.com>
and subject line osmalchemy is no longer in testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #934958,
regarding sqlalchemy breaks osmalchemy (autopkgtest)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 20:39:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944156: fixed in gr-dab 0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #944156,
regarding gr-dab: Don't Build-Depend on pygtk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hi,
The version requirement was dropped:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/33bd1434f0c160770a26bea55328e5bf7545322f
Since Christoph receives emails every six hours, a new release may be in order.
Thank you for your patience as we work to make Lintian better for everyone.
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:07 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
> his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate?
Unfortunately, I can only speculate that he meant to present a sense
of urgency. If a new release is needed, Christoph
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #944093 in abinit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #944093 [src:abinit] abinit ftbfs on every architecture
Added tag(s) pending.
--
944093: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: src:paraview
Version: 5.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
Thanks for converting the package to Python3, however the python-paraview has to
be renamed to python3-paraview, according to our Python policy. Please also
change the shebang for the autopkg test when doing that.
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 10:49 -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Also, as a side note, would someone please explain why someone still
> on stretch would need lintian? I am personally on stable, but most
> package maintainers out there seem to track testing or the bleeding
> edge, unstable.
Well, at
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #933459 in pgadmin3 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #933459 [pgadmin3] pgadmin3: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package
Added tag(s) pending.
--
933459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Felix,
> Since Christoph receives emails every six hours, a new release may
> be in order.
Thanks for addressing this. I did just release Lintian prior to this
change, but I do not understand the frequency that Christoph's checks
his email has any bearing here. Can you elaborate? I suspect
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:21:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944093: fixed in abinit 8.10.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #944093,
regarding abinit ftbfs on every architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932679: fixed in python-networkx 2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #932679,
regarding python-networkx: Don't depend on python-gdal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Source: fribidi
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Control: found -1 1.0.5-3.1
Control: fixed -1 1.0.5-3.1+deb10u1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for fribidi.
CVE-2019-18397[0]:
| stack buffer overflow in the
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.0.5-3.1
Bug #944327 [src:fribidi] fribidi: CVE-2019-18397
Marked as found in versions fribidi/1.0.5-3.1.
> fixed -1 1.0.5-3.1+deb10u1
Bug #944327 [src:fribidi] fribidi: CVE-2019-18397
The source 'fribidi' and version '1.0.5-3.1+deb10u1' do not appear to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 942203 src:csvimp src:openrpt src:postbooks-schema
> src:postbooks-updater
Bug #942203 [postbooks] postbooks: fails to comply with the DFSG
Added indication that 942203 affects src:csvimp, src:openrpt,
src:postbooks-schema, and
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:00:41 +0200 "Francesco Poli (wintermute)"
wrote:
> Package: postbooks
> Version: 4.11.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> Dear xTuple Maintainers,
> I noticed that this package is in Debian main and is [released] under
> the terms of the Common Public
Hi!,
Guillem Jover:
> Ah! Thanks for the info. How about the following clarification then? :)
Perfect! That's exactly what I would have needed :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #932679 in python-networkx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:48:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944129: fixed in arp-scan 1.9.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #944129,
regarding arp-scan: not returning any results
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2019 20:42:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932534: fixed in longrun 0.9-22.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932534,
regarding longrun: Uses manual dh sequence operations that are going to be
removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #932679 [src:python-networkx] python-networkx: Don't depend on python-gdal
Added tag(s) pending.
--
932679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932679
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
49 matches
Mail list logo
