Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 937159 serious
Bug #937159 [src:nosexcover] nosexcover: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
937159:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 939580 by 944404
Bug #939580 [src:liquidsoap] liquidsoap: FTBFS with new ffmpeg ocaml library
939580 was blocked by: 941907
939580 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 939580: 944404
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> > Source: linguider
> > Version: 4.1.1-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qt4-removal
> >
> >
Control: severity -1 important
It looks to me like this bug was elevated to Serious to help with the
pygtk removal from Testing, but bleachbit has already been ported away
from pygtk in Testing. Therefore, I'm lowering the severity of this
bug to prevent its autoremoval at this time.
Obviously,
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #936214 [src:bleachbit] bleachbit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
936214: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936214
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 937157 serious
Bug #937157 [src:nose2] nose2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
937157:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 937666 serious
Bug #937666 [src:python-coverage-test-runner] python-coverage-test-runner:
Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: src:python-bx
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-bx
==
ERROR: bx.interval_index_file_tests.test_interval_index_file
Hello,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:02:43 +0100 Georges Khaznadar
wrote:
> Hello Gianfranco,
>
> as the bug is (not elegantly) fixed, and as the deadline for autoremoval
> is in 25 days, I uploaded python-pyqtgraph_0.10.0-4.1 as an NMU.
>
> If you prefer download the good fix before two weeks, do not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 933642 944377
Bug #933642 [devscripts] devscripts: leaves multiple test/uscan/server.py
processes running after build
Bug #944377 [devscripts] src:devscripts: Rebuild hangs
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Marked as found in
tags 943867 +patch
thanks
Since there was no maintainer response to this bug report, I decided to go
ahead and prepare a NMU. While testing for said NMU I found that the package's
clean target did not clean up properly. So I fixed it.
I have uploaded a NMU to delayed/5 with the attached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 943867 +patch
Bug #943867 [stressant] stressant: non-buildd binaries
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
943867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943867
Your message dated Sat, 9 Nov 2019 09:23:01 +0100
with message-id <52996d67-8497-3bef-809f-35f7466e2...@debian.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #925685,
regarding flightgear: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #944324 [src:paraview] python-paraview has to be renamed to python3-paraview
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
944324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
maybe I am wrong with that, the package is called paraview-python at least.
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 03:33:05AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: frr
> Version: 7.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
[...]
> dpkg: error processing archive
>
Control: found -1 9.2.1-16
Control: severity -1 important
according to the upstream report, also with 9.2.0.
On 08.11.19 23:18, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Package: gdc-9
Version: 9.2.1-17
Severity: serious
Hi!
Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates
duplicate non-weak
Processing control commands:
> found -1 9.2.1-16
Bug #944380 [gdc-9] GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces
Bug #942607 [gdc-9] gtk-d FTBFS on armhf, multiple definition errors.
Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1-16.
Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1-16.
>
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944060: fixed in exim4 4.93~RC1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #944060,
regarding exim4-daemon-light: FTBFS (testsuite error) on mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: lazarus-src-2.0
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear all,
I just tried to upgrade my system, but it fails due to the new version of
lazarus-src-2.0 in testing.
Unpacking lazarus-src-2.0
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:04:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944397: fixed in libldm 0.2.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #944397,
regarding libldm FTBFS: error: G_ADD_PRIVATE [-Werror]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:42:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944199: fixed in exim4 4.93~RC1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #944199,
regarding exim4: dsearch in config end up in exim4 panic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
El jue., 7 nov. 2019 a las 2:57, Nicholas D Steeves
() escribió:
>
> Hi Olaf and Dima,
>
> Dima, if it's alright with you can I please take care of this bug?
> I've head I need an RC Bug NMU process for the "demonstrates skills
> and knowledge of process" section of my eventual DD application.
On 2019-11-09 08:05:32, peter green wrote:
> tags 943867 +patch
> thanks
>
> Since there was no maintainer response to this bug report, I decided to go
> ahead and prepare a NMU. While testing for said NMU I found that the
> package's clean target did not clean up properly. So I fixed it.
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:00:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939987: fixed in postgresql-hll 2.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939987,
regarding postgresql-hll is broken with glibc 2.29-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 944243 important
Bug #944243 [logrotate] logrotate fails with "Permission denied" on LXC guest
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 944243 moreinfo buster
Bug #944243 [logrotate] logrotate fails with "Permission denied" on LXC
Package: sat-xmpp-primitivus
Version: 0.7.0a4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: not installable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainer,
Your package sat-xmpp-primitivus depends on python-urwid-satext. However, the
maintainer of src:urwid-satext, the source package that
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896358: fixed in python-flask-rdf 0.2.1-1+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #896358,
regarding python3-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944244: fixed in standardskriver 0.0.3-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #944244,
regarding [standardskriver] Fails to detect local system's IP addresses
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#896385: fixed in python-flask-rdf 0.2.1-1+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #896385,
regarding python-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939819: fixed in mariadb-10.3 1:10.3.18-0+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939819,
regarding mariadb-10.3: Replication hangs with "preparing" and never starts
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942831: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.6-4+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #942831,
regarding CVE-2019-18217
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941018: fixed in glib2.0 2.58.3-2+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #941018,
regarding libglib2.0-0: libdbus clients fail to authenticate with private
GDBusServer
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934043: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-kerb 5.4-2.4~deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934043,
regarding segfaults with use-after-free when using KrbServiceName Any
to be marked as done.
This means that
Control: reassign -1 texlive-base 2019.20191030-1
Control: affects -1 src:sphinx
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:17:40AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The autopkgtest of your package fail with texlive (2019.20191030-1):
>
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 texlive-base 2019.20191030-1
Bug #944400 [src:sphinx] sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive
(2019.20191030-1)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:sphinx' to 'texlive-base'.
No longer marked as found in versions sphinx/1.8.5-3.
Ignoring request to alter
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:10:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942861: fixed in linux 5.3.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #942861,
regarding linux-image-amd64: missing-copyright-file
/usr/share/doc/linux-image-amd64/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that
There was a 3 year old "python 3" branch sitting around in the repo that
I revived by merging in the latest code.
Tests still fail (the test suite hangs on py2 and fails on py3), but at
least there's some work done. A large part of the porting was already
done by converting `print` statements to
On 2019-08-21 23:49:06, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Package: src:monkeysign
> Version: 2.2.4
> Severity: serious
>
> As Python 2 versions of zbar and zbarpygtk were removed, this package should
> be
> updated to use Python 3 or removed.
Monkeysign will not be ported to zbar or pygtk3. There is
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:11:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939571: fixed in python-pyqtgraph 0.10.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #939571,
regarding Fails to import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #943870 [src:auralquiz] auralquiz: FTBFS: undefined reference to
`Phonon::phononVersion()'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
943870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943870
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #943870 in auralquiz reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 933581
Bug #933581 {Done: Gianfranco Costamagna }
[python-networkx] BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and
isn't in bullseye
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions
control: tags -1 +help
[2019-11-08 13:42] Santiago Vila
> Hi.
>
> I've asked the Release Managers about this here:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944351
>
> If they say yes, I'll modify base-files accordingly (for Debian 10.2).
>
> If they say no, please be ready to fix
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:49:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943870: fixed in auralquiz 1.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #943870,
regarding auralquiz: FTBFS: undefined reference to `Phonon::phononVersion()'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 00:55:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#933581: fixed in python-networkx 2.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #933581,
regarding BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in
bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces
> > > /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox
> > >
> > > On
The discussion lead to the following merged upstream patches:
[1] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1173314/
[2] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1173316/
Best regards
Heinrich
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #933581 [python-networkx] BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build
anymore and isn't in bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
933581: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #933581 in python-networkx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in
> older ocaml-nox
Bug #944254 [ocaml-base-nox] ocaml-nox: Files overwrite
/usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package
Changed Bug title to 'ocaml-base-nox: Replaces
Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so
in older ocaml-nox
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2019-11-06 19:53:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: reassign -1 ocaml-base-nox 4.08.1-3
>
> What's the status of this bug?
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 944126 src:ocaml 4.05.0-12
Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [ocaml-nox] ocaml-nox:
Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package
Bug reassigned from package 'ocaml-nox' to 'src:ocaml'.
No longer marked as
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944405: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875031,
regarding [linguider] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 944400 + pending
Bug #944400 [texlive-base] sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive
(2019.20191030-1)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
944400:
On 2019-11-06 19:53:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 ocaml-base-nox 4.08.1-3
What's the status of this bug?
I can see in the Debian ChangeLog:
ocaml (4.08.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium #
On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces
> /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox
>
> On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[...]
> > Is this the same bug as #944126 (the bug title is the same) or
> > is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +help
Bug #939733 [lsb-release] lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release
on Debian 10.1
Added tag(s) help.
--
939733: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939733
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces
> > /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox
> >
> > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> [...]
> >
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 01:13:08AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> control: tags -1 +help
>
> [2019-11-08 13:42] Santiago Vila
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've asked the Release Managers about this here:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944351
> >
> > If they say yes, I'll modify
On 2019-11-10 01:34:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces
> > > >
Control: notfixed 944126 4.08.1-3
Control: forcemerge 944126 -1
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:56 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2019-11-10 01:34:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre
Processing control commands:
> notfixed 944126 4.08.1-3
Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [ocaml-nox] ocaml-nox:
Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package
No longer marked as fixed in versions ocaml/4.08.1-3.
> forcemerge 944126 -1
Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #896611,
regarding portabase FTBFS with sphinx 1.7.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875098,
regarding [portabase] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 06:30:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941474: fixed in networkx 2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #941474,
regarding networkx: Incomplete debian/copyright?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi Salvatore,
As you already prepared a package, you can just upload it with no delay.
Thanks for the patch & help.
If you prefer we'd do the upload -let me know.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:51 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Control: tags 944327 + patch
> Control: tags 944327 + pending
>
>
67 matches
Mail list logo