Processed: re: nosexcover: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937159 serious Bug #937159 [src:nosexcover] nosexcover: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 937159:

Processed: Liquidsoap update

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 939580 by 944404 Bug #939580 [src:liquidsoap] liquidsoap: FTBFS with new ffmpeg ocaml library 939580 was blocked by: 941907 939580 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 939580: 944404 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#875031: [linguider] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

2019-11-09 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:10:41PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > Source: linguider > > Version: 4.1.1-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qt4-removal > > > >

Bug#936214: bleachbit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: severity -1 important It looks to me like this bug was elevated to Serious to help with the pygtk removal from Testing, but bleachbit has already been ported away from pygtk in Testing. Therefore, I'm lowering the severity of this bug to prevent its autoremoval at this time. Obviously,

Processed: Re: Bug#936214: bleachbit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #936214 [src:bleachbit] bleachbit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 936214: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: re: nose2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937157 serious Bug #937157 [src:nose2] nose2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 937157:

Processed: re: python-coverage-test-runner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 937666 serious Bug #937666 [src:python-coverage-test-runner] python-coverage-test-runner: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#944409: python-bx ftbfs on all 32bit architectures

2019-11-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:python-bx Version: 0.8.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-bx == ERROR: bx.interval_index_file_tests.test_interval_index_file

Bug#939571: uploaded a NMU, delayed 15 days

2019-11-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:02:43 +0100 Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Hello Gianfranco, > > as the bug is (not elegantly) fixed, and as the deadline for autoremoval > is in 25 days, I uploaded python-pyqtgraph_0.10.0-4.1 as an NMU. > > If you prefer download the good fix before two weeks, do not

Processed: forcibly merging 933642 944377

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 933642 944377 Bug #933642 [devscripts] devscripts: leaves multiple test/uscan/server.py processes running after build Bug #944377 [devscripts] src:devscripts: Rebuild hangs Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' Marked as found in

Bug#943867: stressant: non-buildd binaries

2019-11-09 Thread peter green
tags 943867 +patch thanks Since there was no maintainer response to this bug report, I decided to go ahead and prepare a NMU. While testing for said NMU I found that the package's clean target did not clean up properly. So I fixed it. I have uploaded a NMU to delayed/5 with the attached

Processed: re: stressant: non-buildd binaries

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 943867 +patch Bug #943867 [stressant] stressant: non-buildd binaries Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 943867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943867

Bug#925685: marked as done (flightgear: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Nov 2019 09:23:01 +0100 with message-id <52996d67-8497-3bef-809f-35f7466e2...@debian.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #925685, regarding flightgear: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: python-paraview has to be renamed to python3-paraview

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #944324 [src:paraview] python-paraview has to be renamed to python3-paraview Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 944324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944324 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#944324: python-paraview has to be renamed to python3-paraview

2019-11-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: severity -1 important maybe I am wrong with that, the package is called paraview-python at least.

Bug#944392: frr: /usr/share/man/man8/vrrpd.8.gz is already shipped by vrrpd

2019-11-09 Thread David Lamparter
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 03:33:05AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: frr > Version: 7.2-1 > Severity: serious > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install > because it tries to overwrite other packages files. [...] > dpkg: error processing archive >

Bug#944380: GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces

2019-11-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: found -1 9.2.1-16 Control: severity -1 important according to the upstream report, also with 9.2.0. On 08.11.19 23:18, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Package: gdc-9 Version: 9.2.1-17 Severity: serious Hi! Currently, GDC can't build package like gtk-d because it generates duplicate non-weak

Processed: Re: Bug#944380: GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 9.2.1-16 Bug #944380 [gdc-9] GDC generates duplicate symbols when using mixins/interfaces Bug #942607 [gdc-9] gtk-d FTBFS on armhf, multiple definition errors. Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1-16. Marked as found in versions gcc-9/9.2.1-16. >

Bug#944060: marked as done (exim4-daemon-light: FTBFS (testsuite error) on mipsel)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:04:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944060: fixed in exim4 4.93~RC1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #944060, regarding exim4-daemon-light: FTBFS (testsuite error) on mipsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#944426: lazarus-src-2.0 fails to upgrade from 2.0.2+dfsg-7 to 2.0.6+dfsg-1: trying to overwrite filefindlaz.lpk

2019-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Package: lazarus-src-2.0 Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Justification: fails to upgrade -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, I just tried to upgrade my system, but it fails due to the new version of lazarus-src-2.0 in testing. Unpacking lazarus-src-2.0

Bug#944397: marked as done (libldm FTBFS: error: G_ADD_PRIVATE [-Werror])

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:04:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944397: fixed in libldm 0.2.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #944397, regarding libldm FTBFS: error: G_ADD_PRIVATE [-Werror] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#944199: marked as done (exim4: dsearch in config end up in exim4 panic)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:42:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944199: fixed in exim4 4.93~RC1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #944199, regarding exim4: dsearch in config end up in exim4 panic to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#944249: gnuplot-mode does not work with emacs26

2019-11-09 Thread Agustin Martin
El jue., 7 nov. 2019 a las 2:57, Nicholas D Steeves () escribió: > > Hi Olaf and Dima, > > Dima, if it's alright with you can I please take care of this bug? > I've head I need an RC Bug NMU process for the "demonstrates skills > and knowledge of process" section of my eventual DD application.

Bug#943867: stressant: non-buildd binaries

2019-11-09 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-11-09 08:05:32, peter green wrote: > tags 943867 +patch > thanks > > Since there was no maintainer response to this bug report, I decided to go > ahead and prepare a NMU. While testing for said NMU I found that the > package's clean target did not clean up properly. So I fixed it.

Bug#939987: marked as done (postgresql-hll is broken with glibc 2.29-1)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:00:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939987: fixed in postgresql-hll 2.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #939987, regarding postgresql-hll is broken with glibc 2.29-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: your mail

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 944243 important Bug #944243 [logrotate] logrotate fails with "Permission denied" on LXC guest Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 944243 moreinfo buster Bug #944243 [logrotate] logrotate fails with "Permission denied" on LXC

Bug#944425: sat-xmpp-primitivus depends on python-urwid-satext which has been dropped

2019-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Package: sat-xmpp-primitivus Version: 0.7.0a4-1 Severity: serious Justification: not installable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear maintainer, Your package sat-xmpp-primitivus depends on python-urwid-satext. However, the maintainer of src:urwid-satext, the source package that

Bug#896358: marked as done (python3-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#896358: fixed in python-flask-rdf 0.2.1-1+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #896358, regarding python3-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#944244: marked as done ([standardskriver] Fails to detect local system's IP addresses)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944244: fixed in standardskriver 0.0.3-2+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #944244, regarding [standardskriver] Fails to detect local system's IP addresses to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#896385: marked as done (python-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#896385: fixed in python-flask-rdf 0.2.1-1+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #896385, regarding python-flask-rdf: flask_rdf fails to import to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#939819: marked as done (mariadb-10.3: Replication hangs with "preparing" and never starts)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939819: fixed in mariadb-10.3 1:10.3.18-0+deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #939819, regarding mariadb-10.3: Replication hangs with "preparing" and never starts to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#942831: marked as done (CVE-2019-18217)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942831: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.6-4+deb10u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #942831, regarding CVE-2019-18217 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#941018: marked as done (libglib2.0-0: libdbus clients fail to authenticate with private GDBusServer)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#941018: fixed in glib2.0 2.58.3-2+deb10u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #941018, regarding libglib2.0-0: libdbus clients fail to authenticate with private GDBusServer to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#934043: marked as done (segfaults with use-after-free when using KrbServiceName Any)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:35:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934043: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-kerb 5.4-2.4~deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #934043, regarding segfaults with use-after-free when using KrbServiceName Any to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#944400: sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive (2019.20191030-1)

2019-11-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: reassign -1 texlive-base 2019.20191030-1 Control: affects -1 src:sphinx Hi, On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:17:40AM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > The autopkgtest of your package fail with texlive (2019.20191030-1): > >

Processed: Re: Bug#944400: sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive (2019.20191030-1)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 texlive-base 2019.20191030-1 Bug #944400 [src:sphinx] sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive (2019.20191030-1) Bug reassigned from package 'src:sphinx' to 'texlive-base'. No longer marked as found in versions sphinx/1.8.5-3. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#942861: marked as done (linux-image-amd64: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/linux-image-amd64/copyright)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:10:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942861: fixed in linux 5.3.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #942861, regarding linux-image-amd64: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/linux-image-amd64/copyright to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#937066: monkeysign: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-09 Thread Antoine Beaupré
There was a 3 year old "python 3" branch sitting around in the repo that I revived by merging in the latest code. Tests still fail (the test suite hangs on py2 and fails on py3), but at least there's some work done. A large part of the porting was already done by converting `print` statements to

Bug#885517: Bug#935335: Depends on removed python-zbar

2019-11-09 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-08-21 23:49:06, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Package: src:monkeysign > Version: 2.2.4 > Severity: serious > > As Python 2 versions of zbar and zbarpygtk were removed, this package should > be > updated to use Python 3 or removed. Monkeysign will not be ported to zbar or pygtk3. There is

Bug#939571: marked as done (Fails to import)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:11:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#939571: fixed in python-pyqtgraph 0.10.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #939571, regarding Fails to import to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Bug#943870 marked as pending in auralquiz

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #943870 [src:auralquiz] auralquiz: FTBFS: undefined reference to `Phonon::phononVersion()' Added tag(s) pending. -- 943870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#943870: marked as pending in auralquiz

2019-11-09 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #943870 in auralquiz reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: reopening 933581

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 933581 Bug #933581 {Done: Gianfranco Costamagna } [python-networkx] BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions

Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-11-09 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +help [2019-11-08 13:42] Santiago Vila > Hi. > > I've asked the Release Managers about this here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944351 > > If they say yes, I'll modify base-files accordingly (for Debian 10.2). > > If they say no, please be ready to fix

Bug#943870: marked as done (auralquiz: FTBFS: undefined reference to `Phonon::phononVersion()')

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2019 23:49:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#943870: fixed in auralquiz 1.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #943870, regarding auralquiz: FTBFS: undefined reference to `Phonon::phononVersion()' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#933581: marked as done (BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 00:55:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#933581: fixed in python-networkx 2.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #933581, regarding BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces > > > /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox > > > > > > On

Bug#941231: u-boot-imx: mx6cuboxi fails to boot

2019-11-09 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
The discussion lead to the following merged upstream patches: [1] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1173314/ [2] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1173316/ Best regards Heinrich

Processed: Bug#933581 marked as pending in python-networkx

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #933581 [python-networkx] BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 933581: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933581 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#933581: marked as pending in python-networkx

2019-11-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #933581 in python-networkx reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Re: Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in > older ocaml-nox Bug #944254 [ocaml-base-nox] ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package Changed Bug title to 'ocaml-base-nox: Replaces

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2019-11-06 19:53:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 ocaml-base-nox 4.08.1-3 > > What's the status of this bug? >

Processed: reassign 944126 to src:ocaml, reassign 944254 to src:ocaml, forcibly merging 944126 944254 ...

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 944126 src:ocaml 4.05.0-12 Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [ocaml-nox] ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package Bug reassigned from package 'ocaml-nox' to 'src:ocaml'. No longer marked as

Bug#875031: marked as done ([linguider] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944405: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875031, regarding [linguider] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#944400: sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive (2019.20191030-1)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 944400 + pending Bug #944400 [texlive-base] sphinx: autopkgtest fails with texlive (2019.20191030-1) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 944400:

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2019-11-06 19:53:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: reassign -1 ocaml-base-nox 4.08.1-3 What's the status of this bug? I can see in the Debian ChangeLog: ocaml (4.08.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium #

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces > /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: [...] > > Is this the same bug as #944126 (the bug title is the same) or > > is

Processed: Re: Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +help Bug #939733 [lsb-release] lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1 Added tag(s) help. -- 939733: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939733 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces > > /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun_shared.so in older ocaml-nox > > > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:41 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > [...] > >

Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-11-09 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 01:13:08AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > control: tags -1 +help > > [2019-11-08 13:42] Santiago Vila > > Hi. > > > > I've asked the Release Managers about this here: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944351 > > > > If they say yes, I'll modify

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2019-11-10 01:34:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2019-11-10 00:48:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: Replaces > > > >

Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: notfixed 944126 4.08.1-3 Control: forcemerge 944126 -1 On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:56 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2019-11-10 01:34:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 01:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 02:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#944254: ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfixed 944126 4.08.1-3 Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane Glondu } [ocaml-nox] ocaml-nox: Files overwrite /usr/lib/ocaml/bigarray.cmi in ocaml-base-nox package No longer marked as fixed in versions ocaml/4.08.1-3. > forcemerge 944126 -1 Bug #944126 {Done: Stéphane

Bug#896611: marked as done (portabase FTBFS with sphinx 1.7.2)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #896611, regarding portabase FTBFS with sphinx 1.7.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#875098: marked as done ([portabase] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:43:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875098, regarding [portabase] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#941474: marked as done (networkx: Incomplete debian/copyright?)

2019-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2019 06:30:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#941474: fixed in networkx 2.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #941474, regarding networkx: Incomplete debian/copyright? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#944327: fribidi: diff for NMU version 1.0.7-1.1

2019-11-09 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi Salvatore, As you already prepared a package, you can just upload it with no delay. Thanks for the patch & help. If you prefer we'd do the upload -let me know. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:51 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags 944327 + patch > Control: tags 944327 + pending > >