Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944505: fixed in fonts-beteckna 0.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #944505,
regarding FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of
inactivity
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #978288 [src:pytest-mock] pytest-mock: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error:
dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
978288: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #978288 in pytest-mock reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags #976305 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #976305 [src:atop] atop: FTBFS twice in a row
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> severity #976305 important
Bug #976305 [src:atop] atop: FTBFS twice in a row
Severity set to 'important' from
tags #976305 unreproducible moreinfo
severity #976305 important
thanks
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:54:50AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> atop FTBFS twice in a row because 'make clean' does not remove the
> generated 'atopsar':
I cannot reproduce this with two debuilds in a row and two fakeroot
Source: libxml-stream-perl
Followup-For: Bug #692311
Here is a suggested patch. Can someone forward that upstream? I would
like to get this fixed as soon as possible, so would rather upload an
NMU with this patch in the next couple of days anyway. But I would
appreciate this being forwarded on my
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:33:08 +0100
with message-id <2bbd01af-be6c-ac08-7f08-6927d1727...@offensive-security.com>
and subject line no autopkgtest failure with version 20.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978522,
regarding ospd-openvas' autopkg tests fail
to be marked as done.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:23:50PM +0100, Michel Le Bihan wrote:
[...]
> The window for getting in Bullseye will close soon and this issue is
> blocking. Will you be able to maintain Chromium in Bullseye? I can help
> with it if needed.
Thanks for you both which were involved in the last two
hi Gregor,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 02:13:53AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've uploaded -2 in order to
> - see what the buildds say
> - get more diagnostics
> - get a .buildinfo file
>
> And the result is:
> - it built on my laptop and on the buildd
> - we should have a .buildinfo file :)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:36:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952336: fixed in photocollage 1.4.3-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952336,
regarding photocollage: FTBFS: dh: error: unable to load addon python3: Can't
locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/python3.pm in
Package: php-enum
Version: 4.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
php-enum/experimental recently started to FTBFS:
debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/php-enum-4.2.0'
php --define zend.assertions=1 /usr/bin/phpunit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 980564 87.0.4280.141-0.1~deb10u1
Bug #980564 [src:chromium] chromium: 88.0.4324.96 stable release
Marked as found in versions chromium/87.0.4280.141-0.1~deb10u1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 978251
Bug #978251 {Done: Lucas Nussbaum } [src:ruby-mysql2]
ruby-mysql2: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of
inactivity
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #978251 to the same values
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:18:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#980281: fixed in q2-dada2 2020.11.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #980281,
regarding q2-dada2: autopkgtest failure: missing depends python3-biom-format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Source: chromium
Version: 87.0.4280.141-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi
For Details please see
https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_19.html
covering
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:04:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979297: fixed in python-llfuse 1.3.8+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #979297,
regarding python-llfuse FTBFS with pytest 6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
With 06-fix-m-option.patch you add these two lines in
src/osdsh/controlsh.c:load_plugin():
mod_mixerdev = dlsym(module, "mixerdevice");
*mod_mixerdev = mixerdevice;
I presume what you intended to accomplish here is to tell the module
which user-specified mixer device to use since
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:34:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978066: fixed in pmix 4.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #978066,
regarding pmix: breaks openmpi autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979041: fixed in openmpi 4.1.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #979041,
regarding libopempi3: aborts python code due to libfabric fork() issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:34:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979480: fixed in openmpi 4.1.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #979480,
regarding mpi4py: autopkgtest failure on arm64, armhf and ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:34:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#980448: fixed in ucx 1.10.0~rc1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #980448,
regarding ucx: breaks openmpi autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #692311 in libxml-stream-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #692311 [src:libxml-stream-perl] FTBFS if non-local network communication
is forbidden
Bug #980481 [src:libxml-stream-perl] libxml-stream-perl FTBFS on IPV6-only
buildds
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
692311:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:06:56 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Here is a suggested patch. Can someone forward that upstream? I would
> like to get this fixed as soon as possible, so would rather upload an
> NMU with this patch in the next couple of days anyway. But I would
>
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:03:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692311: fixed in libxml-stream-perl 1.24-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692311,
regarding FTBFS if non-local network communication is forbidden
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:03:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692311: fixed in libxml-stream-perl 1.24-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692311,
regarding libxml-stream-perl FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
I am pretty knowledgable in C and dynamic linking.
In theory, I would also be very happy to contribute to maintaining this
package. However, time is an ongoing issue and I would need to learn to
make packages for Debian.
I noticed how old was this patch. It doesn't feel very healthy to keep
some
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 919917 serious
Bug #919917 [yui-compressor] yui-compressor: insufficient java dependency in
jessie
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> found 919917 2.4.8-2.1
Bug #919917 [yui-compressor] yui-compressor: insufficient java
Package: golang-github-cznic-lldb
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
golang-github-cznic-lldb ftbfs in current sid:
I: Building the package
I: Running cd /build/golang-github-cznic-lldb-1.0.1/ && env
PATH="/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games" HOME="/nonexistent"
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:git
Bug #980575 [src:kworkflow] kworkflow: autopkgtest needs update for new version
of git
Added indication that 980575 affects src:git
--
980575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: kworkflow
Version: 20191112-1.1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of
Source: node-i18next-xhr-backend
Version: 3.2.2+ds-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: morsmall
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-i18next
Version: 19.8.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: coinst
Version: 1.9.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: jupyter-server
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: racon
Version: 1.4.20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: fwupd-amd64-signed
Version: 1.5.3+2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: conntrack-tools
Version: 1:1.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: eliom
Version: 6.12.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: golang-github-dvsekhvalnov-jose2go
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:33:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#914056: fixed in cclive 0.9.3-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #914056,
regarding cclive FTBFS with boost 1.67
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:33:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953544: fixed in cclive 0.9.3-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #953544,
regarding cclive: Uninstallable due to missing libboost packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Version: 1:1.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
8.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 980573 bullseye sid ftbfs
Bug #980573 [golang-github-cznic-lldb] golang-github-cznic-lldb 1.0.1-1 fails
to build from source (ftbfs)
Added tag(s) ftbfs, sid, and bullseye.
> forcemerge 980573 980668
Bug #980573 [golang-github-cznic-lldb]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 980473 + pending
Bug #980473 [python3-potr] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Crypto'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
980473:
Source: frama-c
Version: 20201209+titanium-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: starjava-topcat
Version: 4.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nurpawiki
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-libnotcurses-sys
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: node-rollup-plugin-sourcemaps
Version: 0.6.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: node-execa
Version: 4.1.0+dfsg+~cs19.3.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pygame-sdl2
Version: 7.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: php-codesniffer
Version: 3.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: libmoox-traits-perl
Version: 0.005-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: quaternion
Version: 0.0.9.4e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: python-griddataformats
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: select2.js
Version: 4.0.13+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-matrix-nio
Version: 0.15.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: node-mysticatea-eslint-plugin
Version: 11.0.0~ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: leiningen-clojure
Version: 2.9.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: lbzip2
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules binary
&
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:git
Bug #980574 [src:gitbrute] gitbrute: autopkgtest needs update for new version
of git
Added indication that 980574 affects src:git
--
980574: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980574
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: gitbrute
Version: 0~12-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of gitbrute
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 978334 2.0.0-1
Bug #978334 [src:php-finder-facade] php-finder-facade: FTBFS: Call to undefined
method SebastianBergmann\Timer\Timer::resourceUsage()
Marked as found in versions php-finder-facade/2.0.0-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2021 19:49:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978288: fixed in pytest-mock 1.10.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #978288,
regarding pytest-mock: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b .
subprocess returned exit status 2
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:git
Bug #980576 [src:mercurial] mercurial: autopkgtest needs update for new version
of git
Added indication that 980576 affects src:git
--
980576: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: mercurial
Version: 5.5.2-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of
Source: schleuder-gitlab-ticketing
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby
Source: ruby-ruby2ruby
Version: 2.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> RuntimeError: unknown
Source: ruby-librarian
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 /usr/
Source: schleuder-cli
Version: 0.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 /usr/
Source: roodi
Version: 5.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: error
Source: ruby-in-parallel
Version: 0.1.17-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is the same failure as #979700 -- I can still
Source: gromacs
Version: 2020.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: nheko
Version: 0.7.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: pytorch
Version: 1.7.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: pocl
Version: 1.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> 132/141 Test #81: regress
Source: olm
Version: 3.2.1~dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: ruby-dataobjects-mysql
Version: 0.10.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> 2021-01-20 15:09
Source: libsass-python
Version: 0.20.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: pyglet
Version: 1.4.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> tests/integration/t
Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.11.1+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: geophar
Version: 18.08.6+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cloud-sptheme
Version: 1.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-llfuse
Version: 1.3.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
On 2021-01-20 12:58, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: leiningen-clojure
Version: 2.9.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 980595 https://github.com/ThomasHabets/arping/issues/39
Bug #980595 [src:arping] arping: FTBFS: arping_test.c:239:8: error:
‘test_mkpacket’ redeclared as different kind of symbol
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 980606 https://github.com/supertuxkart/stk-code/issues/4467
Bug #980606 [src:supertuxkart] supertuxkart: FTBFS: gamepad_config.cpp:35:45:
error: static assertion failed: non continous name
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:33:41 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: racon
> Version: 1.4.20-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-guzzlehttp-psr7
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-guzzlehttp-psr7'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-guzzlehttp-psr7'
> tags 980664 + pending
Bug #980664 [src:php-guzzlehttp-psr7]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source php-codesniffer
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'php-codesniffer'
Limit currently set to 'source':'php-codesniffer'
> tags 980659 + pending
Bug #980659 [src:php-codesniffer] php-codesniffer: FTBFS:
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> cd PHP_CodeSniffer-* && phpunit
> PHPUnit 9.5.
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> phpunit
> PHPUnit 9.5.1 by Seb
Source: libxcb
Version: 1.14-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: pixelmed
Version: 20200416-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: supertuxkart
Version: 1.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: snd
Version: 21.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -c -DSCRIPTS_DIR=\"/usr/s
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo