Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1022232 https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/744
Bug #1022232 [libffi8] libffi8 3.4.3-3 breaks all wayland clients on
arm64/aarch64
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/744'.
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:58:43 +0200
with message-id
and subject line rocm bugs triage
has caused the Debian Bug report #972714,
regarding rocr-runtime: missing B-D: cmake
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
> This libffi upgrade also completely breaks all use of Wayland on
> aarch64.
No, this is likely #1022232, which is now being fixed in 3.4.3-4. This issue
which I see here is not yet reproducible upstream. Once you rebuild python with
the 3.4.3 uploads, the tests start passing again.
I'm
Source: intel-media-driver
Version: 22.5.1+dfsg1+really22.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gnupg-pkcs11-scd
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc vers
Source: python-pyhcl
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gloo
Version: 0.0~git20220518.5b14351-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-puppet-syntax
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-nouislider
Version: 15.6.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lucene4.10
Version: 4.10.4+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-combustion
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: lugaru
Version: 1.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: bart-view
Version: 0.1.00-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2 -ff
Source: lucene8
Version: 8.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: activemq
Version: 5.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: debos
Version: 1.0.0+git20210707.c66a48d-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf
Version: 3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: obs-ptz
Version: 0.10.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: qutebrowser
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pdsh
Version: 2.34-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: librdfa-java
Version: 1.0.0~BETA1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: halide
Version: 14.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: node-deep-for-each
Version: 3.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: irony-mode
Version: 1.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: rust-gpgme-sys
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: psl.js
Version: 1.8.0+ds-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: healpix-java
Version: 3.60+ds-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: glib-networking
Version: 2.74.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: foot
Version: 1.13.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-markdown-it-html5-embed
Version: 1.0.0+ds-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-cattrs
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: golang-gitaly-proto
Version: 1.37.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-gpgme
Version: 0.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: g2clib
Version: 1.6.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release
Hi,
I can confirm that, I have the same problem here. I can't boot into the
5.10.0.19-amd64 kernel, just a blackscreen.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with Radeon Graphics.
Awaiting a solution,
Maurício Forain.
The new Debian 11/bullseye kernel 5.10.149-2 does not help on my setup.
Still a black screen and nothing is logged.
Also in rescue mode without "quiet".
My GPU is:
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] Tobago PRO [Radeon R7 360 / R9 360 OEM] (rev 81)
02:00.1
Hi Lev,
On 23-10-2022 09:08, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Сб 22 окт 2022 @ 21:27 Paul Gevers :
With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of logol fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
swi-prolog from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
Hi Lev,
On 23-10-2022 09:40, Lev Lamberov wrote:
I'm not sure it is the solution, it needs testing. The change in
swi-prolog concerns pre-compiled prolog source code, when there is no
pre-complied prolog code rebuilt is not needed. SWI-Prolog supports
three different kinds of pre-compilation,
5.10.149-2 solved the problem
many thanks for the quick fix
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Bug#1022051: Acknowledgement (linux-image-5.10.0-19-amd64: no boot
possible)
Datum: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:33:04 +
Von: Debian Bug Tracking System
Antwort an:
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:26:50 +0100
with message-id <283b4843-6a48-f65b-8a08-eba45e079...@debian.org>
and subject line re: rust-vm-memory depends on newer rust-arc-swap than is
available
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017949,
regarding rust-vm-memory depends on newer
After updating to the latest version (5.10.149-2), my system
running an AMD GPU and CPU still does not boot. I am unable to
retrieve any logs from the systemd journal.
CPU: AMD FX-8350
GPU: AMD R9 270X (Southern Islands Family)
Kernel command line parameters:
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 10:38:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016452: fixed in loggerhead 2.0.1+bzr541+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016452,
regarding loggerhead: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'loggerhead.tests'
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 10:40:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1021796: fixed in silver-platter 0.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021796,
regarding silver-platter: workspace.py: ImportError: cannot import name
'NoColocatedBranchSupport' from 'breezy.errors'
to
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:29:41 +0200
with message-id
and subject line rocm bugs triage
has caused the Debian Bug report #985693,
regarding libhsa-runtime-dev: broken symlink: /usr/lib/libhsa-runtime64.so ->
libhsa-runtime64.so.1.1.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 12:02:52 CEST inasprecali wrote:
> After updating to the latest version (5.10.149-2), my system
> running an AMD GPU and CPU still does not boot. I am unable to
> retrieve any logs from the systemd journal.
Does it really not boot? Or does the screen not work properly?
Andreas and inasprecali,
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 09:17:44 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> Kernel parameters are:
> radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1
> amdgpu.cik_support=1 amdgpu.gpu_recovery=1
You both have kernel parameters like these. Can you explain why?
I have an
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 11:28:33 CEST Dan Smolik wrote:
> after upgrade kernel from 5.10.0-18 to 5.10.0-19 system is unbootable.
> Problem is similar this bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209177.
> I try recommended
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1022268 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-19-amd64: Boot failure under xen as
dom0
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1022268 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-19-amd64: Boot failure under xen as
dom0
Added
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1019365 1.0.0-3
Bug #1019365 {Done: Mike Gabriel }
[qml-module-lomiri-settings-fingerprint] qml-module-lomiri-settings-fingerprint
: Depends: qml-module-biometryd but it is not installable
No longer marked as found in versions
On zondag 23 oktober 2022 14:10:11 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> > You both have kernel parameters like these. Can you explain why?
> > I have an AMD GPU on a machine and I have never set parameters like these.
>
> These are parameters for Southern Islands (si) and Sea Islands (cik) AMD
> GPUs:
Source: libstringprep-java
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: libbdplus
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: rust-rustyline
Version: 9.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: iem-plugin-suite
Version: 1.13.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: bpfcc
Version: 0.24.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: doxygen
Version: 1.9.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: lua-mode
Version: 20210802-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cctbx
Version: 2022.9+ds2+~3.11.2+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: netpanzer
Version: 0.8.7+ds-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gcc-12-cross-ports
Version: 10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mv stamps
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 13:40:26 +0200 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> Does it really not boot? Or does the screen not work properly?
>
> The cases in this bug report all boot AFAIK, it's just that the
screen does
> not work properly, but people were able to SSH into the machine.
> If your system
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 13:43:30 +0200 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> Andreas and inasprecali,
>
> On zondag 23 oktober 2022 09:17:44 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> > Kernel parameters are:
> > radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1
> > amdgpu.cik_support=1 amdgpu.gpu_recovery=1
>
>
Source: spirv-llvm-translator-14
Version: 14.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1022409 llvm-14-dev 1:14.0.6-5
Bug #1022409 [src:ccls] ccls: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18:
override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ccls' to 'llvm-14-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Source: postgresql-periods
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: skimage
Version: 0.19.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: pgq-node
Version: 3.4-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: healpy
Version: 1.15.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: azure-cosmos-python
Version: 3.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: postgres-decoderbufs
Version: 1.8.0.final-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pglogical-ticker
Version: 1.4.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-requirements-detector
Version: 0.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: postgresql-debversion
Version: 1.1.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-peachpy
Version: 0.0~git20211013.257881e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: m2crypto
Version: 0.38.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: ufo-extractor
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: pulsemixer
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: slony1-2
Version: 2.2.10-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: python-pcl
Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: fades
Version: 9.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: toastinfo
Version: 1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pgsphere
Version: 1.1.1+2021-11-10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lift
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
&
Source: zope.i18nmessageid
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: xrstools
Version: 0.15.0+git20210910+c147919d-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: recan
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: pysolar
Version: 0.10+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: postgresql-hll
Version: 2.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: deluge
Version: 2.0.3-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: hcloud-python
Version: 1.16.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18.0-1
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.18.0-1
Bug #1022263 [src:hcloud-python] src:hcloud-python: fails to migrate to testing
for too long: uploader built arch:all binary
Marked as fixed in versions hcloud-python/1.18.0-1.
Bug #1022263 [src:hcloud-python] src:hcloud-python: fails to migrate
Вс 23 окт 2022 @ 09:16 Paul Gevers :
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 23-10-2022 09:08, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>> Сб 22 окт 2022 @ 21:27 Paul Gevers :
>>> With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of logol fails in
>>> testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
>>> swi-prolog from
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, at 05:18, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for caffeine (versioned as 2.9.12-0.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
I’ve cancelled the NMU and will prepare my own upload shortly.
Thanks anyway, sorry for
Am 23.10.22 um 13:43 schrieb Diederik de Haas:
You both have kernel parameters like these. Can you explain why?
I have an AMD GPU on a machine and I have never set parameters like these.
These are parameters for Southern Islands (si) and Sea Islands (cik) AMD
GPUs:
Source: networking-l2gw
Version: 1:17.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-biopython
Version: 1.79+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: crawl
Version: 2:0.28.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gn
Source: spades
Version: 3.15.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
