Package: webmin-telnet
Version: 1.160-2
Severity: serious
The package creates web pages which attempt to use the jta20.jar file
via a symlink in the package and the reference to the symlink in the
webpage, but the jta package now (sarge) provides jta25.jar instead.
This clearly needs fixing.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:23:35AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:09:49PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
The package creates web pages which attempt to use the jta20.jar file
via a symlink in the package and the reference to the symlink in the
webpage, but the jta
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:00:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Thanks for your tips, however tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 supposedly used
efmt files; but it doesn't seem to return expected values:
$ basename `kpsewhich --format fmt tex`
tex.fmt
$ basename `kpsewhich --format fmt latex`
latex.fmt
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:21:29PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Please provide a 'initex' that prints out a warning that
it is being deprecated for etch.
This would break the fundamental initex feature as documented
in its manual.
I can understand that you've been considerinig initex
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:41:16PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: mftrace
Version: 1.1.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'mftrace' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
[...]
**
WARNING: you
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages
This is what Thomas said about initex as a symlink. So this just
about does it.
Julian
- Forwarded message from Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:44:57 +0100
From: Thomas Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removal of initex?
To: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL
Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-17
Severity: serious
Last time I used update-grub (a while ago, Jan 2005, I think!), it
automagically added these entries at the end (the repetitiveness I can
cope with, although it was buggy!)
But when I ran the testing version, these entries were not
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:14:00PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-17
Severity: serious
Last time I used update-grub (a while ago, Jan 2005, I think!), it
automagically added
reassign 306595 xmltex
severity 306595 important
merge 306595 262395
severity 262395 serious
tags 262395 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
Here is what I have:
-rw-r--r-- 1
[To debian-release: this is about bug#307816 and bug#300768]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
Sid:
cweb is a dummy package.
cweb depends on tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore not installable
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
tags 307816 -sid
thanks
That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
the package in sarge is not really usable.
Agreed.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 05,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: cwebx
Version: 3.04-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 02:44:37PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote:
In source/latex/eepic, only the *sty files have a license statement
(Public Domain), but all the others (examples, documentation source)
don't.
What a pity, this hasn't been touched for more than a decade.
At least it's that
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-2
Severity: grave
I'm running testing, and just dist-upgraded. This version of yelp
shows the section titles, but when I click on one, eg, GNU Cash
Manual, it attempts to open the XML file using firefox, which isn't
right at all (firefox doesn't know what to do with
found 360769 0.3.14-10.1
thanks
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:17:06PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
severity 360769 grave
severity 361326 grave
merge 362476 361326 360769
reassign 362476 scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10
close 362476 0.3.14-10.1
thanks
This bug has been fixed by a new upload of the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:44:02PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 27 avril 2006 ? 21:35 +0100, Julian Gilbey a ?crit :
This bug has been fixed by a new upload of the scrollkeeper package. If
it is still happening on your system, you should just run the
scrollkeeper-rebuilddb
Package: dpkg-sig
Version: 0.12
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Line 1627 of /usr/bin/dpkg-sig reads:
$DEBUG (open (LOG, , /tmp/dpkg-sig.log) || die _die(Couldn't open
log: $!));
This is assuming that this file does not exist, is not a symlink and
so on. This is a security hole and should
Hi DB maints!
Are you going to be able to do an upload to fix this and #169830 soon?
If not, I'll try to do an NMU (putting it in the DELAY queue).
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: db1-compat
Version: 2.1.3-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
fakeroot debian/rules binary (or debuild binary) fails as the
binary-arch target does not depend on the build target.
Trivial patch: add this dependency!
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:16:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:04:51PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Are you going to be able to do an upload to fix this and #169830 soon?
If not, I'll try to do an NMU (putting it in the DELAY queue).
I'm pretty sure everyone
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-6
Severity: grave
Justification: could lead to unexpected data loss or corruption
My daily locate cronjob started giving me funny warnings:
/usr/bin/find: Filesystem loop detected; `//burnside-unstable' has the
same device number and inode as a directory which is 1
Further info: I also upgraded my kernel from 2.6.12-10 to 2.6.15-4 at
the same time, so it might be a kernel bug.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-15 00:24]:
If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to
sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after
the new tipa:
Setting up
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-15 00:24]:
If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to
sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after
the new tipa:
Setting up
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:19:26PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tetex-base contains /usr/share/doc/texmf/doc as a symlink.
I suppose you mean /usr/share/texmf/doc.
In woody the package ivritex contained this as a directory.
This is a
On Florent's request, I'm currently building a fixed tetex-base
package with this fix in it. So that these sorts of things can be
fixed for release, please can we avoid tampering with the main
branches of the tetex-* CVS repositories; it seems silly to have a
separate branch just for this release
tags 384735 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:13:52PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: derivations
Version: 0.4.20060804-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
when building 'derivations' on unstable, I get the following error:
trig.tex:1188: leading text: \sphere
trig.tex:1188:
tags 382131 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:32:24PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Package: libgwrap-runtime0-dev
Version: 1.9.6-3
Severity: serious
The 1.9.6-3 ia64 version of g-wrap contains a bogus pkgconfig file,
with the line:
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: serious
When configuring this kernel, I observed the following:
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
Missing Required paramater 'Old' at
According to Manoj in the logs to bug#394661, which was blocking this
bug and has since been closed, the bug was fixed in kernel-package
10.063. So I guess that all that is needed is a rebuild of the
kernels with a Build-Depends on a sufficiently recent kernel-package.
Julian
--
To
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: auctex
Version: 11.82-1
Severity: serious
This package doesn't install on a fresh testing system:
Setting up auctex (11.82-1) ...
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm. Can you send us the file
/usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog (or *.gz)
No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the
/usr/bin/emacs
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
JG == Julian Gilbey [2006-6-6]
JG No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the
JG /usr/bin/emacs symlink not existing.
Do you think we can close this bug?
I closed it within an hour or so
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable
During the postinst phase when installing this package on this laptop,
I see the message: Comparing clocks (this will take 70 sec)...
and then it just hangs there for hours (literally - I left it
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:24:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable
During the postinst phase when installing this package on this laptop,
I see the message: Comparing clocks (this will take 70 sec
Package: ttf-mathematica4.1
Version: 1
Severity: serious
Thanks for making this package - it's very helpful.
Unfortunately, the installation is noisy: prompting about the licence
happens during the preinst rather than during the dpkg Preconfiguring
stage. This probably means that some question
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:28:58PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Unfortunately, the installation is noisy: prompting about the licence
happens during the preinst rather than during the dpkg Preconfiguring
stage. This probably means that some question or other is missing
from config or
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2007-14
Severity: serious
I was just looking at the proba.sty package, and wondering what the
purpose of a couple of the macros was. I looked for the proba.dtx
file but it turns out that it does not exist on CTAN, yet the licence
in the file specifies that it
Package: compiz-core
Version: 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1
Severity: serious
After doing a recent aptitude upgrade on my testing system, compiz no
longer loads. The error message is Couldn't find plugin 'cpp'.
Here is aptitude's most recent log, which may shed light on this.
Julian
Will
Package: compizconfig-backend-gconf
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: serious
I just tried compiling it on my testing machine, and it died as it
couldn't find libxslt.pc, so I needed to install libxslt1-dev to build
the package.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:05:58PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:44:21 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: compiz-core
Version: 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1
Severity: serious
After doing a recent aptitude upgrade on my testing system, compiz no
longer
Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source
Version: 1.0.9639-1
Severity: serious
Hi all!
Are you by any chance planning to upload the newest 9xxx kernel driver
any time soon? I'm using 9639 but it doesn't compile with kernel
2.6.24; I'm assuming that the 96.43 version will be similar, although
I
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx (96.43.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream (closes: #473114)
* added uploaders (closes: #472443)
* removed xserver-xorg-core depend.
Many thanks for your speedy work!
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
severity 393552 normal
tags 393552 wontfix
thanks
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:12:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Package: ctie
Version: 1.1.debian.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5 12.7
$ dpkg --contents ctie_1.1.debian.1_all.deb
22:06 aurel32 drwxr-xr-x root/root
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.28-1~lenny1
Severity: serious
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error:
euclid:~ # mount -t cifs //WGS-SVR-001/RMStaff /mnt/wggs/rmstaff -o
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:13:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Julian,
Hi Steve!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:03:57PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.28-1~lenny1
Severity: serious
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:23:30AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:47:34AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error:
euclid:~ # mount -t cifs
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:23:30AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
To mount such shares without DNS support, you have three options:
- add your own entry in /etc/hosts
- add nss_wins from the winbind package to your nsswitch.conf
- use the ip= option to mount.cifs
I used the second solution,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:59:33PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
I've implemented a workaround, a special case for jadetex and xmltex, in
update-fontlang. Here's a first draft for the documentation part in
TeX-on-Debian:
+ sect1 id=jadetex-xmltex-specialcase
+headingA
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
Thanks for your bugreport.
I can reproduce the failure here and I'm looking into the problem
now. As a workaround you can run:
# apt-get update -o Acquire::PDiffs=false
Looks like the diff file is corrupt; applying it manually
found 466262 6.8.2-1
close 466262 6.12.1-12
thanks
--
britney thinks this bug is still alive. Hopefully this will settle her.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 563683 important
thanks
This bug, while serious, affects both 0.6.1 and 0.6.2. This should
not prevent 0.6.2 migrating to testing, therefore, as that version
fixes a grave issue.
Setting a cron job to raise the severity back to serious in 48 hours'
time, which should allow 0.6.2 to
Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.12.6-2
Severity: serious
I run rhythmbox and it shows me the standard dialog box, listing all
of the music. My only problem is that it does not play anything at
all when I press Play: the track indicator remains stubbornly fixed at
0:00 and does not move.
I have no
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:35:28PM +0100, MP wrote:
I think I encountered same problem, after installing new version in sid
(amd64), splash screen briefly blinks and then I got Segmentation fault
Adding --help or -v or anything on commandline have no effect, running
under user that never run
Package: nvidia-libvdpau1
Version: 195.36.24-1
Severity: serious
This package MUST have a Conflicts: libvdpau1 line, and probably also
a Replaces: libvdpau1 in the control file. Likewise, the
nvidia-libvdpau-dev package must have a Conflicts: libvdpau-dev line
and probably a Replaces:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 02:36:13PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: nvidia-libvdpau1
This package breaks any which Depend upon libvdpau1, for even though
it provides all of the library files needed, and has a compatible ABI
and API (to the best of my
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:49:01AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Package: erm
Version: 0.12-0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
erm FTBFS with the message
ERROR: dependencies 'MASS' are not available for package 'eRm'
from R CMD INSTALL; I presume a
Package: flim
Version: 1:1.14.9-4
Severity: serious
The package metamail has now been removed from unstable, as it appears
to be abandoned upstream. This makes flim's recommendation of
metamail unfulfillable, as well as the base64-external-*
etc. variables in /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50flim.el no
Package: protobuf
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
See
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=protobufver=2.0.3-2arch=ia64stamp=1242204657file=log
- the build dies at this point:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -pthread -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Woverloaded-virtual
Me too. Attached are my xorg.conf, the X log, glxinfo. Just upgraded
to compiz 0.8.2-6 and found this problem. The messages that compiz
--replace gives are:
Checking for Xgl: not present.
Detected PCI ID for VGA: 00:02.0 0300: 8086:2592 (rev 04) (prog-if 00
[VGA controller])
Checking for
I think I've found the problem: compizconfig-backend-gconf 0.8.2-1 has
not yet migrated to testing. Bizarrely, there is no dependency
mentioned, and yet this was the entire problem: upgrading this package
from 0.7.6-1 to 0.8.2-1 solved the problem for me.
So there is a dependency or conflict
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:36:36AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Package: asymptote
Version: 1.86-1
Justification: FTBFS
Severity: serious
Hi,
asymptote FTBFS on some architecture.
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=asymptote
-
.
dh_shlibdeps -pasymptote
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 01:10:26AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:09:04 +0100 Julian Gilbey
j...@polya.uklinux.net wrote:
I have rebuilt the package with this bug fixed, and am about to upload
it to the 3-day delayed queue (it's an NMU). Here is the patch I have
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:27:38 +0100 Julian Gilbey
j...@polya.uklinux.net wrote:
I'm bemused, incidentally, how your package ever built successfully on
i386. Perhaps there was a change in the cdbs package or something
like
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 08:47:50AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
The problem only manifests itself during a binary-arch build, and
doesn't happen during a full package build.
Not true, it seems - it happened to me during a full package build.
Here's a second attempt at a diff to
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:02:49AM +0300, Vladimir Zamiussky wrote:
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #516780
I found iceweasel sporadically segfaults using after update from etch to
lenny.
Segfault takes place on this page: http://www.rosbalt.ru, it is not
reopen 534867
thanks
I've reopened this bug because I've just been stung by it myself. The
issue seems to be not so much that the package I'm trying to build
(nvidia graphics module, see http://bugs.debian.org/510961) is using
references to linux/* rather than asm/*, but rather that it
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:52:35PM -0300, pedro bulach gapski wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
OpenOffice just crashes at statup on mu KDE desktop. Backtrace follows.
[...]
terminate called after throwing an instance
Package: lhs2tex
Version: 1.13-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The current version in unstable is not building on some architectures
because it has been patched to use the Control.OldException module,
which was only introduced in more recent versions of ghc. The
temporary patch would be to
I tried building the latest version of the modules (195.36.15, based
on the 190.53-2 Debian package, with the source updated), but ran into
this same problem. I can't figure out the instructions and
suggestions in this bug report, so I just ran a plain m-a on it, and
it died (in exactly the same
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes:
I tried building the latest version of the modules (195.36.15, based on
the 190.53-2 Debian package, with the source updated), but ran into this
same problem.
By this same problem
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes:
No, it was compilation problems, which I think are to do with the
kernel-headers common package business. Indeed, I forgot to attach the
log - attached this time!
This is some
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:45:32AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
My bad. It turns out that 195.36.15 is completely broken upstream; I
have no clue how they get it to compile.
I can try and have a look at it. I was trying to see how to best get
2.6.33 supported yesterday (although I
Package: chrony
Version: 1.24-2
Severity: serious
Oh dear
Setting up chrony (1.24-2) ...
Starting /usr/sbin/chronyd...
/usr/sbin/chronyd failed to start.
invoke-rc.d: initscript chrony, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing chrony (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:52:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Package: install-info
Version: 4.13a.dfsg.1-5
Severity: critical
The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg as dpkg
uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf, dpkg-reconfigure, I am not
sure which exactly
Package: bzflag
Version: 2.0.16.20100405
Severity: serious
The documentation in /usr/share/doc/bzflag is not compressed, which is
a violation of policy requirements.
(Incidentally, the version number makes this look like a native
package, whereas in fact it is not.)
This seems to be because
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:41:04AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Happy new year,
Not good[TM]. I'll open a wishlist bug to have that changed. Should
be that hard to source /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf at the beginning of these
Can you transplant the X hierarchy somewhere else? I suspect not.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:40:06AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Faheem Mitha wrote:
That was easier than expected. See Revision 1.285 at the top, the
last change to preview.el.
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/auctex/preview/preview.el?root=auctexview=log
I'll try
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:41:29AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I just tried applying it to 11.86 in sid, and installing it on my
squeeze machine, but it does not work for me.
This is the error I get:
gs -dOutputFile\=\(_region_.prv/tmp5769OxL/pr1-1
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:44:42PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
I'll try your packages out later.
Anyone else who wants to test, feel free to try them too, and copy
the report with your results.
Some obvious questions. Are you sure the patch got applied
correctly? What versions of relevant
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:32:31AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Heh. Well, that does sound like lots of fun. Unfortunately, as I
wrote to Julian Gilbey, I still seem to have breakage, even with
this patch. If I set TeX PDF mode to true, ie.
It seems that it was my TeX file which was broken
users peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
usertags + no-add-needed
thanks
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:43:16PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: emacs23
Version: 23.2+1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Please see attached build log from building in a pbuilder sid
Package: backintime-common
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: potential data loss
I hadn't checked that my backups were working recently, and to my
horror discovered that nothing had been backed up since I last
checked. The reason for this? There was a directory with
=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix ctime.pl problem which was causing mail loss (Closes: Bug#652740)
+
+ -- Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:20:30 +
+
mailagent (1:3.1-72-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- mailagent
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:50:08PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:42:48AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I hadn't checked that my backups were working recently, and to my
horror discovered that nothing had been backed up since I last
checked. The reason
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:52:28AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Package: src:erm
Version: 0.14-0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds:
Thanks for that - new
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:40:45PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:54:57AM +0100, Francis Russell wrote:
This bug just bit me from testing and required manual intervention in a
package manager to fix. How is this
wishlist?
Ditto
reassign 634575 texlive-binaries
severity 633011 serious
merge 633011 634575
thanks
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:35:23AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: cwebx
Version: 3.04-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:34:08AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: cjk
Version: 4.8.2+git20090105-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110718 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
You're sending a lot of these bugs; is this an
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:25:03PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
You're sending a lot of these bugs; is this an automated system?
Semi-automated.
I review all mails before sending them, but it's not always easy to
detect patterns like this one.
This, as well as 634575 and possibly many
This bug might be related to the problem in texlive-binaries (tex
fails on every file), but as it runs latex rather than tex, it is
probably unrelated.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Julian,
The following FTBFS are from packages using texlive-binaries, though not
all of them are caused by this issue.
I've reassigned all the relevant ones.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: kino
Version: 1.3.4-1.1
Severity: serious
kino is currently uninstallable on testing, as it depends on
libquicktime1; the current version of libquicktime in testing/unstable
is libquicktime2. Please could you rebuild kino (if possible) against
the new library?
Many thanks!
Julian
Package: gnotski
Version: 1:3.4.2-3
Severity: grave
(Marking as grave because the puzzle is meaningless with this bug.)
When starting gnotski under XFCE4 (I haven't tried with other window
managers), dragging a block to a new position draws the new position
of the block, but does not undraw the
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:18:56AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 15 Jun 2012, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:
- I guess we have to add a epoch 1: otherwise the new version is
smaller than what is in sid now
I guess that you are talking about the version number of the biber
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (ééè) wrote:
So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an
epoch. Â 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. Â It seems a shame to
introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are
going
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:27:09PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Source: raschsampler
Version: 0.8-5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
raschsampler fails to build from source on arm*, but built in the past:
fi
* installing *source* package 'RaschSampler' ...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2012/6/27 Julian Gilbey jul...@d-and-j.net:
Are you seeing this problems with other R packages or is it unique to
this one?
I noticed there are a lot of this failures, but I have realized that
after I sent this bug
Package: src:cups
Version: 1.5.2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on armel
Just in case you haven't seen the failure, cups 1.5.2-10 barfed out on
the armel build:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cupsarch=armelver=1.5.2-10stamp=1334046792
The failure point was during the
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
