alias for df, defined on your system, is used
by localepurge.
A simple fix would be to replace this `df' call by a `/bin/df' one,
and to do the same for the `du' call bellow.
Christoph, could you please try this suggested fix on your system and
tell us if it works?
Ciao,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL
?
Ciao,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| gnupg key @ http://intrigeri.boum.org/intrigeri.asc
pgpOBGdEFndLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mawk 1.3.3-11 a pattern scanning and text proces
backupninja recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii gawk 1:3.1.5.dfsg-4 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii mawk 1.3.3-11 a pattern scanning and text proces
backupninja recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri [EMAIL
, nor have any set value, which seems
weird to me.
Running dpkg-reconfigure -plow util-vserver does not ask any question.
Bye,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
notfound 456996 0.30.215-2
found 456996 0.30.214-6
thanks
Hello,
Micah Anderson wrote (11 Apr 2008 23:39:48 GMT) :
* intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-08 03:09-0400]:
When I upgraded a lenny system from 0.30.214-6 to 0.30.215-2, all my
VServers were restarted without any warning.
Yes
rebuilding support for P
system-config-lvm recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| gnupg key @ http://gaffer.boum.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| Then we'll come from the shadows.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the hosted repositories nor the gitosis config match
this definition.
[1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARCACHEAPPLICATIONCACHEDATA
Bye,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martian-modem 20061203-1 ltmodem alternative driver providi
-- no debconf information
Bye,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again SHell
ii dialog1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii mawk 1.3.3-11 a pattern scanning and text proces
backupninja recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
package backupninja
found 391519 0.9.3-6
found 388543 0.9.3-6
found 371858 0.9.3-6
notfound 391519 0.9.4-1
notfound 388543 0.9.4-1
notfound 371858 0.9.4-1
thanks
Forgot to close them in debian/changelog, then closed them forgetting
the Version pseudoheader...
Should be ok now.
--
intrigeri
Package: clamav
Version: 0.84-2.sarge.13
Severity: serious
All versions prior to 0.90 are suspected to be vulnerable to a resource
consumption vulnerability in Clam AntiVirus' ClamAV allows remote attackers to
degrade the service of the clamd scanner. E.g., legitimate email can be refused
because
Package: clamav
Version: 0.84-2.sarge.13
Severity: serious
Hello,
All versions prior to the 0.90 stable release are suspected to be vulnerable to
a directory traversal vulnerability that allows remote attackers to overwrite
files owned by the clamd scanner, such as the virus database file. This
backporting the security fix ?
Ciao,
--
intrigeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| gnupg key @ http://intrigeri.boum.org/intrigeri.asc
| The impossible just takes a bit longer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qemu-kvm doesn't require joining any special group.
Did this fix your problem actually?
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| So
Hi,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote (25 Apr 2010 08:02:20 GMT) :
The problem stil exist. The script try to insert itselv both before
and after $network (via $remote_fs), which is impossible.
Same here in Squeeze.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https
)
Versions of packages gnome-screensaver suggests:
ii xscreensaver-data 5.10-7 data files to be shared among scre
-- no debconf information
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https
-screensaver/lock_dialog_theme --type string
This GConf key was previously set to the default string.
Please note I'm using the XMonad as the GNOME window manager, and did
not test it with Metacity yet.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
the bug I reported.
Josselin, I'll let you reassign the bug or tag it appropriately if
needed, as I'm not sure whether this bug shall be attributed to
gnome-screensaver (for not depending on the right libgnomekbd4
version) or to Squeeze's libgnomekbd4.
bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG
, which in turn points to
/usr/bin/aptitude-curses.
Same here.
bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| So what?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
time-changing software is
running on your build environments if any? This 1s offset looks like
the various ntp daemons adjustment process.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https
to Squeeze for other
architectures.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| If you must label the absolute, use it's proper name: Temporary
.
bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc
| If you must label the absolute, use it's proper name: Temporary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
way and/or to apply the
workaround suggested by Paul?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
in testing and unstable, so it seems to me this bug now makes
the package unusable or mostly so.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 638012 + pending
thanks
Hi,
I've prepared an NMU for kernel-package (versioned as 12.036+nmu2) and I
will soon ask my AM to upload it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me
if I should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
intrigeri
diff -Nru kernel-package-12.036+nmu1/debian/changelog
look fine here with the exception of hurd-i386:
I cannot replicate this FTBFS with 1.25-1 in my kfreebsd-amd64 VM
(perl 5.14.2-5, libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3).
Regards,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Do not be trapped by the need to achieve anything.
| This way, you achieve everything.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
waiting for some bugfixes in the rsync handler before I upload
a new package. I have no precise ETA for this. Is it fine with you?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
, but
reducing the Debian / Ubuntu delta seems important too :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Who wants a world in which the guarantee that we shall not
| die
intrig...@debian.org wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:27:24 GMT) :
(As a side note, it's not clear to me what's the point of this package
at all. [...]
By chance, I eventually found #649784, so it's now clear to me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Pablo Santamaria wrote (10 Feb 2012 14:43:28 GMT) :
Is anyone working on this?
Yes:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934
http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/953
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
of the binary packages)?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Every now and then I get a little bit restless
| and I dream of something
? Is there a project of doing this
consistently to all XUL extensions packaged in Debian, or merely to go
on doing this on a case by case basis, only when needed?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
is automatically skipped when no
connection to the Internet is available (thanks to LWP::Online), so
the Debian buildds should not affected, correct?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
against svn trunk. Need to
have a chat with Mister_X to decide what to do first.
Anything new?
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| Then we'll
tags 642732 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote (24 Sep 2011 19:46:45 GMT) :
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Thanks for this QA effort. I've fixed this bug in Git.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https
tags 639273 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I believe the attached patch should fix this issue.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
| The impossible just
to ask my AM (Cc'd) to upload it to DELAYED/10 at the end of
the month. Feel free to tell me if you think we should do otherwise.
Thank you for maintaining barry in Debian.
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
diff -u barry-0.15/debian/control barry-0.15/debian/control
--- barry-0.15/debian
Hi,
Yavor Doganov wrote (11 Oct 2011 20:35:53 GMT) :
Axel Beckert wrote:
Maybe you forgot the Cc to debian-release@l.d.o in your mail...
Hmm, it was intentional, I hesitated to CC release as I'm sure a
release manager will comment sooner or later because it blocks the
GNUstep transition
still like #680084 to be fixed independently for Wheezy.
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
of the time, but...
I'll try to generate a new release this weekend.
Excellent!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
Hi,
Agustin Martin wrote (28 Nov 2012 12:11:20 GMT) :
Since #670292 seems indeed the same problem as #619367 and #677191
and is fixed in sid xemacs21 21.4.22-4 (and so should be #619367 and
#677191) I am reassing all those bugs to xemacs21 package and
forcibly merging them to get all closed.
Rob Browning wrote (02 Dec 2012 20:34:59 GMT) :
For now, I'm inclined to fix the /usr/local issue, and then hope to
continue this discussion after the release.
Plausible?
I think this totally makes sense.
Thanks for tackling this RC bug :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 22:44:13 GMT) :
Michael Gilbert wrote (19 Nov 2012 00:10:21 GMT) :
reassign 680084 grub-common
forcemerge 680084 673573
thanks
I'm glad you found the root cause of #680084, but perhaps another kind
of relationship would have expressed more clearly
Hi Michael,
intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 22:44:13 GMT) :
Michael Gilbert wrote (19 Nov 2012 00:10:21 GMT) :
reassign 680084 grub-common
forcemerge 680084 673573
thanks
I'm glad you found the root cause of #680084, but perhaps another kind
of relationship would have expressed more clearly
tags 684923 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fontconfig (versioned as 2.9.0-7.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
diff -Nru fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog fontconfig-2.9.0/debian
at the time of your writing, and the latter was... not
released upstream yet. I'm removing the indication that this bug
affects 0.17.1 accordingly.
Helmut, Jayes: can you please confirm that this bug is fixed in mpd
0.17.1-1, that's currently available in Debian unstable?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi VLC maintainers,
intrigeri wrote (23 Sep 2012 14:22:32 GMT) :
I confirm the upgrade process is left is a deeply broken state, which
apt-get -f install and dpkg --configure -a are unable to resolve.
I had to manually dpkg -i a few dozen packages in the right order
before apt-get could get
close 680829 0.17-1
thanks
Builds fine in current sid with libcatalyst-perl 5.90015-1,
as expected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: xul-ext-torbutton
Version: 1.4.6-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream, fixed-upstream
Starting iceweasel 10.0.9-ESR today triggered a bunch of errors from
Torbutton (a few dialog windows to dismiss per open tab):
* Torbutton Exception in sandbox evaluation. Date hooks not applied:
close 680826
thanks
Builds fine now that sid has libcatalyst-perl 5.90015-1,
as expected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Lucas Nussbaum wrote (08 Jul 2012 17:09:35 GMT) :
Test Summary Report
---
t/01-app.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=2, Tests=7, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.02 sys + 1.13 cusr 0.12 csys
= 1.28
CPU)
Result: FAIL
make[1]:
Hi Jonas,
Jonas Genannt wrote (17 Oct 2012 06:18:07 GMT) :
we should remove it from testing, because Gitalist was also removed.
Do you want to do it, or do you prefer me to?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
Paul Gevers wrote (13 Oct 2012 17:01:09 GMT) :
I purged emacs23 packages, removed /etc/emacs23 directory, loaded
the emacs23-common_23.4+1-3_all.deb
emacs23-bin-common_23.4+1-3_amd64.deb emacs23_23.4+1-3_amd64.deb
files from snapshot.debian.org and upgraded normally. It works for
me, the
tags 680084 + patch
thanks
intrigeri wrote (30 Sep 2012 09:42:14 GMT) :
I can see that too with os-prober installed.
TL;DR --- see patch at the bottom of this message.
I retried, and I did not see that *the first time*.
First time log:
$ pgrep -l grub-mount
$ sudo update-grub
is *needed*, count me in.
Else, I'll go spend my time somewhere else in more useful ways :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
.
(Closes: #619399)
After reading #619399, it seems to me the answer to my question is
a clear yes, so goto #2.
Thoughts?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
, I'm wondering if my
testing method is correct...
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
to the policy if there's still disagreement,
or need for clarification, on how to interpret the local changes to
configuration files must not be overridden idea as far as symlinks
are concerned.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
, as far as this specific bug is concerned, I concur with
Andreas Metzler's analysis (non-buggy, but undocumented behaviour),
and I will review his patch right away.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
this problem by copying into
a fresh user account parts of your dotfiles until you manage to
reproduce the problem?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
in Squeeze, looks doable.
But perhaps we want to avoid hard-coding this path once again?
Any idea how this could be achieved? (I guess the maintainers did not
do it that way simply by choice, so I guess it's not trivial.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
packaging
repository. Thank you. Tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
a RC bug.
So, from a release engineering PoV, I suggest we address the
RC-buggy(?) part of the bug report first :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
it!
All reproducible RC bugs against dovecot have been fixed in Git for
a month. Can we expect a package suitable for a freeze unblock request
to be uploaded any time soon?
Thank you for maintaining Dovecot in Debian!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (31 Oct 2012 17:15:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, since you could reproduce the problem, could you test,
whether this patch fixes the problem for you?
I confirm I cannot reproduce the bug anymore with brasero 3.4.1-4.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
just be busy with DebConf13...
Thank you for taking care of this.
I certainly loved a clear patch ;)
Then you should be happy with gregoa's one,
and Wheezy will have one less RC bug! :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
.
If they put themselves at the front of the load-path they that's
where they stay. (A deliberate decision so as not to upset anything
which has to or had to force an order ...)
Yes. This will be for other bug reports, I guess. Let's fix that
one first.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (08 Nov 2012 09:21:06 GMT) :
#690409: php5-xcache: upgrades clobber local changes to xcache.ini
It has been closed by Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org.
I'm a bit unsure about the bugfix:
I just upgraded php5-xcache 2.0.0-2 from testing to 2.0.0-3 from sid.
applied right from the beginning, and I guess it's good for Squeeze to
Wheezy upgrades, but apparently it does not deal well with
Wheezy-Wheezy upgrades :(
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (20 Sep 2012 11:21:04 GMT) :
#681426: syslinux-themes-debian-wheezy: extlinux/theme.cfg refers to
debian-squeeze files
It has been closed by Daniel Baumann
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net.
I stumbled upon this critical bug while looking at the
.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
be granted a freeze exception. So,
what's the plan? Fixing #675895 in Wheezy through tpu? Removing parrot
from Wheezy altogether?)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
.
Great news! One less RC bug in Wheezy :)
I think it can be set as fixed by icu/4.8.1.1-8.
I'll let you proceed, then.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote (10 Nov 2012 20:51:33 GMT) :
I did test both and in both cases I had .dpkg-something files
around. Maybe I just did not torture dpkg enough to test all
cases...
I just tried again:
1. install 2.0.0-1 (not sure it's needed, but I wanted to simulate
a coming from
address into integeri,
but luckily I was subscribed to the bug :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
path.
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
, but else I can
surely find better ways to use my time :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (14 Nov 2012 21:30:25 GMT) :
I think this is not necessary. Alexander Wirt is currently already
preparing the upload:
Awesome!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
yet another
upload just for changelog clarification.
Fair enough.
Case closed, then! :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
the bug and see if
someone reports something similar in the future?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
dist-upgrade
Could anyone please enlighten me?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
there. While we're
at it, any other important enough bugs that you really want to get
fixed in Wheezy, that can be fixed in a minimal enough way to go with
the RC bug fix through a freeze unblock (e.g. I'm thinking of #691390
and #691758) ?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
of hoping for 2.0.8...)
I'm happy to see there's a plan. In the meantime, I've been triaging
a few bugs that are important or tagged patch, in the hope it helps
clarifying what is worth cherry-picking for Wheezy.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
Hi Keith,
intrigeri wrote (29 Oct 2012 21:19:47 GMT) :
Otherwise, this patch seems fine to me. Nice job!
Tagging patch accordingly: I propose we fix this bug that way, and
clone/reassign/whatever to the policy if there's still disagreement,
or need for clarification, on how to interpret
Hi Rob,
intrigeri wrote (04 Nov 2012 14:15:33 GMT) :
Rob, how about applying this patch to fix #454778 and #676424?
(Please note that the latter is RC for Wheezy, that's why I landed
here in the first place.)
(Gentle) ping?
I'd rather wait for a solution #677191 to be available, so that both
Wheezy?
Thank you for writing Dancer-Plugin-Database!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (12 Jun 2012 12:55:35 GMT) :
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:11:27PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
The only thing left will be to cleanup libpoe-component-pubsub-perl git repo
(used for Debian packages). Nicholas has removed version 0.091317 from CPAN,
so our git
Hi,
gregor herrmann wrote (09 Jun 2012 22:27:44 GMT) :
Yup, still FBTFS:
No answer from upstream so far.
This is a leaf package, very low popcon.
In addition, I don't know anything to POE, so I won't try to fix this.
Ryan, looks like (#517953) you uploaded it for your own needs,
do you still
Package: msva-perl
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: grave
$ cat $HOME/.monkeysphere/monkeysphere.conf
USE_VALIDATION_AGENT=true
KEYSERVER=keys.indymedia.org
$ . $HOME/.monkeysphere/monkeysphere.conf
$ msva-perl
Use of uninitialized value $loglevel in lc at
Ryan Niebur wrote (14 Jun 2012 23:24:17 GMT) :
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:14:10PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
Ryan, looks like (#517953) you uploaded it for your own needs,
do you still use it?
No, I do not use POE anymore, feel free to RM this if needed.
So, I hereby propose we remove libpoe
in there, that shall be reported and fixed.
I'll try to isolate a minimal testcase and will report it in Debian
and upstream.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (19 Jun 2012 19:44:19 GMT) :
However, given Net::Server pretends to be taint clean, it does looks
like there's a serious bug in there, that shall be reported and fixed.
I'll try to isolate a minimal testcase and will report it in Debian
and upstream.
I tried building msva
Package: vidalia
Version: 0.2.19-1
Severity: serious
vidalia now Depends: apparmor, although the latter package is not
needed for Vidalia to provide a significant amount of functionality.
I believe this is a violation of the Debian Policy.
In general, packages that ship an AppArmor profile
is not enabled on the kernel command-line, some harmless error
messages are printed at boot time, so I think you're actually trading
a harmless error message at upgrade time for another harmless error
message at every boot time + a policy violation, which is not
very convincing.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Chris Frey wrote (22 Jun 2012 20:53:20 GMT) :
Upstream tag: barry-0.18.3-4
I think you forgot to push the tag.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Chris Frey wrote (22 Jun 2012 20:53:20 GMT) :
A new version of Barry is available which fixes the ppp dependency
on kfreebsd.
Thanks, but I'm not totally happy with it.
First, it does not fix the dependency on ppp on kfreebsd: it
*removes* that dependency on !linux. So, I think the changelog
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
