Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On 15/09/07 at 22:58 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Michael Stone told: On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on a PowerBook5,6. Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything particularly complicated.) Mike Stone In rules: cd $(BUILD_TREE) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) \ LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) CC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.1 ./configure \ --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \ --prefix=/usr -v \ --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man \ $(SELINUX_OPTS) It sucks the same :( Hi, coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on bruckner.d.o. Apparently both the buildd and bruckner built with gcc 4.2. Elimar, Bram, could you please try again with coreutils 6.10-1? Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: [...] Hi, coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on bruckner.d.o. Apparently both the buildd and bruckner built with gcc 4.2. Elimar, Bram, could you please try again with coreutils 6.10-1? I can't find them neither in unstable nor in experimental? Elimar -- The path to source is always uphill! -unknown- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: [...] Hi, coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on bruckner.d.o. Apparently both the buildd and bruckner built with gcc 4.2. Elimar, Bram, could you please try again with coreutils 6.10-1? I can't find them neither in unstable nor in experimental? It is in unstable. You can dget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/coreutils/coreutils_6.10-1.dsc -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: [...] Hi, coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on bruckner.d.o. Apparently both the buildd and bruckner built with gcc 4.2. Elimar, Bram, could you please try again with coreutils 6.10-1? I can't find them neither in unstable nor in experimental? It is in unstable. You can dget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/coreutils/coreutils_6.10-1.dsc coreutils: Installed: 5.97-5.7 Candidate: 5.97-5.7 Version table: *** 5.97-5.7 0 990 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Not synced complete yet. Anyway, the package builds fine: gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20080114 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-7) but: Now running lintian... W: coreutils source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.2.2 (current is 3.7.3) E: coreutils source: build-depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version build-depends: perl-base W: coreutils: package-contains-empty-directory sbin/ W: coreutils: spelling-error-in-news-debian compatability compatibility E: coreutils: preinst-calls-install-info Finished running lintian. This should be æasy to fix. The last changelog entry hst to be reformated as well. Thanks Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything particularly complicated.) Ran a couple of quick compile tests, gcc-4.0 works gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 fail. Haven't had time to track down what the difference in the generated code is though. In the short term, can the build famr be forced to use gcc-4.0 ? Yours Tony linux.conf.auhttp://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2008.linux.org.au/ Jan 28 - Feb 02 2008 The Australian Linux Technical Conference! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything particularly complicated.) Ran a couple of quick compile tests, gcc-4.0 works gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 fail. Haven't had time to track down what the difference in the generated code is though. In the short term, can the build famr be forced to use gcc-4.0 ? Comments from gcc people? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Bram Senders told: Package: coreutils Version: 6.10~20070907 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi there, I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite: === 8 === Making check in seq make[3]: Entering directory `/home/bram/Source/coreutils/coreutils-6.10~20070907/build-tree/coreutils-6.10~20070907/tests/seq' /usr/bin/make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/home/bram/Source/coreutils/coreutils-6.10~20070907/build-tree/coreutils-6.10~20070907/tests/seq' -: test float-3: stdout mismatch, comparing float-3.O (actual) and float-3.1 (expected) *** float-3.O Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 --- float-3.1 Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 *** *** 1,3 10.8 10.9 - 11.0 --- 1,2 FAIL: basic === 8 === Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on a PowerBook5,6. Elimar -- Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on a PowerBook5,6. Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything particularly complicated.) Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Michael Stone told: On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Confirmed! Same build in a pbuilder environment with sid sources on a PowerBook5,6. Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel sparc, and seq just doesn't do anything particularly complicated.) Mike Stone In rules: cd $(BUILD_TREE) CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) \ LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) CC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.1 ./configure \ --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \ --prefix=/usr -v \ --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man \ $(SELINUX_OPTS) It sucks the same :( Elimar -- The path to source is always uphill! -unknown- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks for the report. However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) on bruckner, with CFLAGS=-g ./configure make, and it passes that same test: bruckner$ ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 10.8 10.9 I also recompiled seq.o with CFLAGS=-O2. Same result. Can you try the same thing on whatever system you used? I pulled the latest sources from git and built them with CFLAGS=-g, like you said, giving again the same erroneous results: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 10.8 10.9 11.0 Recompiling seq by hand with -O2 gives the same faulty result as compiling with -g gives for me. So there seems to be some kind of difference between bruckner and my machine... I don't understand this. Any hints or pointers? Cheers, Bram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
Bram Senders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks for the report. However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) on bruckner, with CFLAGS=-g ./configure make, and it passes that same test: bruckner$ ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 10.8 10.9 I also recompiled seq.o with CFLAGS=-O2. Same result. Can you try the same thing on whatever system you used? I pulled the latest sources from git and built them with CFLAGS=-g, like you said, giving again the same erroneous results: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 10.8 10.9 11.0 Recompiling seq by hand with -O2 gives the same faulty result as compiling with -g gives for me. So there seems to be some kind of difference between bruckner and my machine... I don't understand this. Any hints or pointers? gcc version? Maybe libc bruckner has this: gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) libc6: Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6 Please send me your lib/config.h file so I can compare it with mine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
Package: coreutils Version: 6.10~20070907 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi there, I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite: === 8 === Making check in seq make[3]: Entering directory `/home/bram/Source/coreutils/coreutils-6.10~20070907/build-tree/coreutils-6.10~20070907/tests/seq' /usr/bin/make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/home/bram/Source/coreutils/coreutils-6.10~20070907/build-tree/coreutils-6.10~20070907/tests/seq' -: test float-3: stdout mismatch, comparing float-3.O (actual) and float-3.1 (expected) *** float-3.O Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 --- float-3.1 Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 *** *** 1,3 10.8 10.9 - 11.0 --- 1,2 FAIL: basic === 8 === The same sources build fine on i386. Cheers, Bram Senders -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages coreutils depends on: ii libacl1 2.2.42-1Access control list shared library ii libc62.6.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libselinux1 2.0.15-2+b1 SELinux shared libraries coreutils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#442040: coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
Bram Senders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: coreutils Version: 6.10~20070907 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi there, I cannot build the current coreutils from experimental from source on PowerPC, because of a failure in the seq test suite: ... *** float-3.O Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 --- float-3.1 Wed Sep 12 12:47:28 2007 *** *** 1,3 10.8 10.9 - 11.0 --- 1,2 FAIL: basic === 8 === Thanks for the report. However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) on bruckner, with CFLAGS=-g ./configure make, and it passes that same test: bruckner$ ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 10.8 10.9 I also recompiled seq.o with CFLAGS=-O2. Same result. Can you try the same thing on whatever system you used? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
