Processed: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #790664 [polyorb] FTBFS with new LaTeX: Undefined control sequence / no 
output PDF file produced
Added tag(s) patch and pending.

-- 
790664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #835966 [src:polyorb] RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
Added tag(s) patch and pending.

-- 
835966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

control: tags -1 patch pending

> because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building
> without it just worked.
> I didn't manually close the bug (that I would have otherwise do) because
> I believe that's the maintainer responsability.
> 
> I also didn't close #835966 because, well, the package is in mess right
> now.

since there is some reasons to close this one, since we have maintainer and a 
sponsor.
I'm nmuing it again, with the additional pdf patch  in a few minutes.
(and moreover we got rid of old gnat dependency)

G.
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog  2016-09-19 16:20:50.0 
+0200
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog  2016-10-03 16:02:52.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+polyorb (2.11~20140418-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+  [ Svante Signell ]
+  * debian/patches/examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch:
+- fix build failures with some Tex versions
+  (Closes: #835966, Closes: #790664).
+
+ -- Gianfranco Costamagna   Mon, 03 Oct 2016 
15:56:15 +0200
+
 polyorb (2.11~20140418-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
--- 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
2016-10-03 15:58:05.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- a/examples/corba/echo/echo-impl.adb.orig   2014-03-20 21:52:43.0 
+0100
 b/examples/corba/echo/echo-impl.adb2016-09-02 
12:11:41.916884091 +0200
+@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
+  S (L - 2 .. L) := (others => '.');
+   end if;
+   Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line
+-("Echoing string: « " & S (S'First .. L) & " »");
++("Echoing string: << " & S (S'First .. L) & " >>");
+   return Mesg;
+end EchoString;
+ 
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series 
polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series 2016-09-19 14:49:16.0 
+0200
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series 2016-10-03 15:56:15.0 
+0200
@@ -44,3 +44,4 @@
 support-tilde-in-pathname.patch
 make-clean.patch
 add-missing-include.patch
+examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:57:34AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> A question: Why did you not apply the documentation patch threrby closing bug
> #790664? From the build logs no texi files were processed, how come?

because I could not figure what your patches actually did, and building
without it just worked.
I didn't manually close the bug (that I would have otherwise do) because
I believe that's the maintainer responsability.

I also didn't close #835966 because, well, the package is in mess right
now.

> Furthermore, if you approve to be my sponsor for uploads, I can try to 
> maintain
> that package, thereby also closing #835966?

fine by me :)
Though if you do please start by maintaining it in git somewhere¹ with
gbp and do senseful commits, as otherwise I fear whatever you'd do would
be too big to review sanely.
Also keep in mind that I know nothing about ada, nor its policy.


Thank you for your interest!


¹ if that Vcs repository is not useful please import all the package
  history by `gbp import-dscs --debsnap`
-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 14:28 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:58:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > 
> > > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> > > latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
> > > stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here.
> > > I'm available whenever you need assistance.
> > I'd happy to sponsor an NMU for you.
> > Would you kindly provide me a single debdiff from the polyorb as
> > currently in the archive to what you'd get?
> Alright, I uploaded the attached debdiff, based on Svante's patches.
> 
> I'm not closing this bug, as the package is really unmaintainer, and I
> have no clue whether it actually works after my NMU.
> If anybody needs sponsorship to upload any possible fix/improvements,
> please feel free to contact me.

A question: Why did you not apply the documentation patch threrby closing bug
#790664? From the build logs no texi files were processed, how come?

Furthermore, if you approve to be my sponsor for uploads, I can try to maintain
that package, thereby also closing #835966?

Thanks!

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:58:07PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> > latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
> > stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here.
> > I'm available whenever you need assistance.
> 
> I'd happy to sponsor an NMU for you.
> Would you kindly provide me a single debdiff from the polyorb as
> currently in the archive to what you'd get?

Alright, I uploaded the attached debdiff, based on Svante's patches.

I'm not closing this bug, as the package is really unmaintainer, and I
have no clue whether it actually works after my NMU.
If anybody needs sponsorship to upload any possible fix/improvements,
please feel free to contact me.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
diffstat for polyorb-2.11~20140418 polyorb-2.11~20140418

 changelog |   10 ++
 control   |4 ++--
 patches/add-missing-include.patch |   16 
 patches/hardening.patch   |3 +--
 patches/series|1 +
 rules |7 +++
 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog	2014-09-26 13:00:26.0 +
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/changelog	2016-09-19 14:20:50.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+polyorb (2.11~20140418-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+  [ Svante Signell ]
+  * build with gnat-6.  Closes: #831255.
+  * Add patch to fix compilation due to missing include.
+
+ -- Mattia Rizzolo   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:20:50 +
+
 polyorb (2.11~20140418-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [Ludovic Brenta]
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/control polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/control
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/control	2014-09-26 13:00:26.0 +
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/control	2016-09-19 12:44:40.0 +
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Ludovic Brenta 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.9.7), dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1),
  dh-ada-library, python-gnatpython,
- automake, autotools-dev, libtool, gnat-4.9, python
+ automake, autotools-dev, libtool, gnat-6, python
 Build-Depends-Indep: ghostscript, texlive-formats-extra,
  texlive-generic-recommended, transfig, texinfo
 Standards-Version: 3.9.5
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 Package: libpolyorb3-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libpolyorb4 (= ${binary:Version}), g++, gnat-4.9
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libpolyorb4 (= ${binary:Version}), g++, gnat-6
 Breaks: libpolyorb2-dev
 Replaces: libpolyorb2-dev
 Recommends: polyorb-servers (= ${binary:Version})
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/add-missing-include.patch polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/add-missing-include.patch
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/add-missing-include.patch	1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/add-missing-include.patch	2016-09-19 12:49:52.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+Author: Svante Signell 
+Acked-By: Mattia Rizzolo 
+Last-Update: 2016-09-02
+
+Index: polyorb-2.11~20140418/src/csupport.c
+===
+--- polyorb-2.11~20140418.orig/src/csupport.c
 polyorb-2.11~20140418/src/csupport.c
+@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
+ /* C support functions for PolyORB */
+ 
+ #include "config.h"
++#include 
+ 
+ #ifdef HAVE_FCNTL_H
+ #include 
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/hardening.patch polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/hardening.patch
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/hardening.patch	2014-09-26 13:00:26.0 +
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/hardening.patch	2016-09-19 13:00:42.0 +
@@ -2,11 +2,10 @@
 ===
 --- a/Makefile.in
 +++ b/Makefile.in
-@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
+@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
  # Main PolyORB Makefile
  
 +include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
-+include /usr/share/ada/debian_packaging.mk
 +
  .PHONY: default
  default: all
diff -Nru polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series	2014-09-26 13:00:26.0 +
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/debian/patches/series	2016-09-19 12:49:16.0 +
@@ -43,3 +43,4 @@
 xe_back-polyorb.adb.patch
 support-tilde-in-pathname.patch
 

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
> latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
> stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here.
> I'm available whenever you need assistance.

I'd happy to sponsor an NMU for you.
Would you kindly provide me a single debdiff from the polyorb as
currently in the archive to what you'd get?

Thanks in advance.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:01 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-
> > > ada
> > > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to
> > > download it
> > > please ?
> > 
> > I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The
> > patches
> > were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is
> > running
> > out until the package is removed. The patches are also available in
> > bug
> > #835966.
> 
> How is this going?
> 
> I'm eager to remove gcc-4.9 and gnat-4.9.
> I could get them forcefully removed, but given that there has been
> interested in this bug I suppose that would be too rude.
> 
> If nobody is interested in doing more test of those paches, it looks
> like they work as expected nonetheless, don't they?  (I might have
> misread some message).  If that's the case, what uploading them even
> without any proper ack from debian-ada@?

As fas as I understand it is OK to NMU this package, based on the
latest replies by Xavier. Unfortunately nobody from debian-ada has
stepped forward, and Xavier is too busy, maybe you can help out here.
I'm available whenever you need assistance.

Thanks! 

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> > conflict source as far as I understand.
> > 
> > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada
> > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to download it
> > please ?
> 
> I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The patches
> were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is running
> out until the package is removed. The patches are also available in bug
> #835966.

How is this going?

I'm eager to remove gcc-4.9 and gnat-4.9.
I could get them forcefully removed, but given that there has been
interested in this bug I suppose that would be too rude.

If nobody is interested in doing more test of those paches, it looks
like they work as expected nonetheless, don't they?  (I might have
misread some message).  If that's the case, what uploading them even
without any proper ack from debian-ada@?

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 17:24 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > 
> > I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The
> > patches
> > were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is
> > running
> > out until the package is removed. The patches are also available in
> > bug
> > #835966.
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=835966;msg=13
> ;filename=examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
> bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=835966;ms
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13
> ;filename=src_csupport.c.patch
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13
> ;filename=hardening.patch
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13
> ;filename=debian_rules.patch
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13
> ;filename=debian_control.patch
> 
> if you want to wget them you need to quote the URLs (as due to the ;
> the
> shell would think it a series of command chained).

What's the problem? In 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835966#13
clicking on the attachments downloads/opens the patches.

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> > conflict source as far as I understand.
> > 
> > I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada
> > can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to download it
> > please ?
> 
> I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The patches
> were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is running
> out until the package is removed. The patches are also available in bug
> #835966.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=debian_patches_series.patch
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=src_csupport.c.patch
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=hardening.patch
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=debian_rules.patch
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=3;bug=835966;msg=13;filename=debian_control.patch

if you want to wget them you need to quote the URLs (as due to the ; the
shell would think it a series of command chained).

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 14:14 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the
> conflict source as far as I understand.
> 
> I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada
> can test your patched package ? Can you provide an url to download it
> please ?

I don't have a natural url place to put the changes, sorry. The patches
were attached to my first posting in this thread and time is running
out until the package is removed. The patches are also available in bug
#835966.

HTH

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Xavier Grave]

No, I think you don't need more tests since you have found the conflict source 
as far as I understand.

I'm very short of time for the month - may be someone on debian-ada can test 
your patched package ? Can you provide an url to download it please ?

- Mail original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>
Cc: 835...@bugs.debian.org, "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, 
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Septembre 2016 13:00:33
Objet: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi again,

seems like the conflicting application is qemu-system-x86_64 whichever port I
choose in examples/dsa/bank/polyorb.conf:
# cat polyorb.conf
[dsa]
name_service=corbaloc:iiop:1.2@127.0.0.1:9099/NameService/00024fF800
0
[iiop]
polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=5001

# cat namer/polyorb.conf
[iiop]
polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=9099

# netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN|less
8709/qemu-system-x8 
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:50010.0.0.0:*   LISTEN

ps aux|grep 8709
root  8713  0.0  0.0  0 0 ?SAug24   0:00 [kvm-pit/8709]

In order to test properly I need to do that in an environment not running qemu,
like in a qemu linux guest. Unfortunately I cannot shut down all qemu instances
I have running on the box.

Do you want me to do that too? It will take a while.

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:40 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> I never got such error when using dsa, does the example is still running ?
> Did you try :
> netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN
> In order to see what's is running and may collide with the bank example.
> 
> But if the example from the web page is running I think you have achieved a
> working polyorb package as far as I can see. Nice.

Thanks!

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Sorry, the correct entries should be:

tcp 0  0  0.0.0.0:5001  0.0.0.0:*  LISTEN  11061/./bank_server 
tcp 0  0  0.0.0.0:9099  0.0.0.0:*  LISTEN  11060/po_cos_naming 

Then I don't know where the problem is.

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Hi again,

seems like the conflicting application is qemu-system-x86_64 whichever port I
choose in examples/dsa/bank/polyorb.conf:
# cat polyorb.conf
[dsa]
name_service=corbaloc:iiop:1.2@127.0.0.1:9099/NameService/00024fF800
0
[iiop]
polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=5001

# cat namer/polyorb.conf
[iiop]
polyorb.protocols.iiop.default_port=9099

# netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN|less
8709/qemu-system-x8 
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:50010.0.0.0:*   LISTEN

ps aux|grep 8709
root  8713  0.0  0.0  0 0 ?SAug24   0:00 [kvm-pit/8709]

In order to test properly I need to do that in an environment not running qemu,
like in a qemu linux guest. Unfortunately I cannot shut down all qemu instances
I have running on the box.

Do you want me to do that too? It will take a while.

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:40 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> I never got such error when using dsa, does the example is still running ?
> Did you try :
> netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN
> In order to see what's is running and may collide with the bank example.
> 
> But if the example from the web page is running I think you have achieved a
> working polyorb package as far as I can see. Nice.

Thanks!

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Xavier Grave]

I never got such error when using dsa, does the example is still running ?
Did you try :
netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN
In order to see what's is running and may collide with the bank example.

But if the example from the web page is running I think you have achieved a 
working polyorb package as far as I can see. Nice.

xavier

- Mail original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>, 835...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Mardi 6 Septembre 2016 16:31:50
Objet: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:17 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> You should also run the po_cos_naming, you can look at [1] in order to see how
> to "play" with dsa applications.
> 
> xavier
> [1] : http://wiki.ada-dk.org/a_dsa_tutorial
> 
The dsa exammple in that web page works!

The bank example almost works too:
(after changing 192.168.1.1:9099 to 127.0.0.1:9099)

./bank_server
...
Request : p

=> Print

   Customer : poor
   Password : 
   Balance  :  25

   Customer : middle
   Password : 
   Balance  :  250

   Customer : rich
   Password : 
   Balance  :  2500


Menu :

   Create
   Load
   Print
   Quit
   Save

Request : 

./bank_client
polyorb.utils.tcp_access_points: bind failed: [98] Address already in use

raised GNAT.SOCKETS.SOCKET_ERROR : [98] Address already in use

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 11:17 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> You should also run the po_cos_naming, you can look at [1] in order to see how
> to "play" with dsa applications.
> 
> xavier
> [1] : http://wiki.ada-dk.org/a_dsa_tutorial
> 
The dsa exammple in that web page works!

The bank example almost works too:
(after changing 192.168.1.1:9099 to 127.0.0.1:9099)

./bank_server
...
Request : p

=> Print

   Customer : poor
   Password : 
   Balance  :  25

   Customer : middle
   Password : 
   Balance  :  250

   Customer : rich
   Password : 
   Balance  :  2500


Menu :

   Create
   Load
   Print
   Quit
   Save

Request : 

./bank_client
polyorb.utils.tcp_access_points: bind failed: [98] Address already in use

raised GNAT.SOCKETS.SOCKET_ERROR : [98] Address already in use

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Xavier Grave]

You should also run the po_cos_naming, you can look at [1] in order to see how 
to "play" with dsa applications.

xavier
[1] : http://wiki.ada-dk.org/a_dsa_tutorial

- Mail original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>, 835...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 17:14:26
Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi,

After installing the built packages I tried the bank example. It seems like it
fails:

$ ./bank_server
system.partition_interface: Cannot register information for RCI
POLYORB.DSA_P.PARTITIONS with name server.
raised POLYORB.COMM_FAILURE

$ ./bank_client (bank_server failed to start, see above)
raised SYSTEM.RPC.COMMUNICATION_ERROR : lookup of RCI polyorb.dsa_p.partitions
failed

However, since the latest commit was in February 2016 and the current code is
from 2014 maybe there is a solution already available?

Thanks!

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> In last polyorb version, you should use po_gnatdist.
> 
> - Mail original -
> De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
> À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>
> Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, 835...@bugs.debian.org, debian-ada@l
> ists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 11:40:50
> Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a
> modern
> version of it?
> 
> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious
> > with
> > polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb
> > version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try
> > to
> > run the bank demo code.
> > 
> > Cordially, xavier

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Hi,

After installing the built packages I tried the bank example. It seems like it
fails:

$ ./bank_server
system.partition_interface: Cannot register information for RCI
POLYORB.DSA_P.PARTITIONS with name server.
raised POLYORB.COMM_FAILURE

$ ./bank_client (bank_server failed to start, see above)
raised SYSTEM.RPC.COMMUNICATION_ERROR : lookup of RCI polyorb.dsa_p.partitions
failed

However, since the latest commit was in February 2016 and the current code is
from 2014 maybe there is a solution already available?

Thanks!

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> In last polyorb version, you should use po_gnatdist.
> 
> - Mail original -
> De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
> À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>
> Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, 835...@bugs.debian.org, debian-ada@l
> ists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 11:40:50
> Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a
> modern
> version of it?
> 
> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious
> > with
> > polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb
> > version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try
> > to
> > run the bank demo code.
> > 
> > Cordially, xavier

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Xavier Grave]

In last polyorb version, you should use po_gnatdist.

- Mail original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Xavier Grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>
Cc: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, 835...@bugs.debian.org, 
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 5 Septembre 2016 11:40:50
Objet: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi,

Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a modern
version of it?

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious with
> polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb
> version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try to
> run the bank demo code.
> 
> Cordially, xavier

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Hi again,

When issuing make examples execuables in the two test directories
examples/polyorb and example/moma are built, not the other ones.
Running the tests as indicated in the corresponding README, all four tests in
polyorb pass and in moma the tests I) to II) in the README pass and test III)
outputs the following: (test IV) not tried)
Initialization..: PASSED
Set behavior and procedures.: PASSED
Handling message ...: PASSED
Retrieved message  1: PASSED
Send message # 1: PASSED
Test #1.: PASSED
polyorb.orb: ORB.Run got exception:
polyorb.orb: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : client_call_back_procedures.adb:58 explicit
raise
Call stack traceback locations: ...

Seems to work rather fine, even with a newer gnat version. And, the issues could
probably be solved by investigating the modifications made by upstream since
2014?

Thanks!

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 11:40 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a
> modern
> version of it?
> 
> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious
> > with
> > polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb
> > version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try
> > to
> > run the bank demo code.
> > 
> > Cordially, xavier

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Hi,

Seems like gnatdist is needed to run the bank example. Where can I find a modern
version of it?

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 10:37 +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious with
> polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb
> version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try to
> run the bank demo code.
> 
> Cordially, xavier

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Xavier Grave]

Hi,

I can't upload anything any longer I'm sorry. And one have to be cautious with 
polyorb, compilation of the package doesn't mean it is functional. Polyorb 
version is linked to the compiler so may be it should be interesting to try to 
run the bank demo code.

Cordially, xavier

- Mail original -
De: "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@gmail.com>
À: "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>
Cc: "xavier grave" <xavier.gr...@csnsm.in2p3.fr>, 835...@bugs.debian.org, 
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 4 Septembre 2016 17:59:01
Objet: Re: Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Xavier: ping!

>From Aug 31:
> I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
> unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:11 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-
> > > > 6. With these
> > > > patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> > > > 
> > > >   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
> > > > New debian patches: debian_control.patch,
> > > > debian_rules.patch,
> > > > debian_patches_series.patch
> > > > New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
> > > > examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> > > > Modified patches: hardening.patch
> > > Do you mind uploading a fixed polyorb?  (a NMU, I suppose).
> > 
> > I'm not a DD/DM, so I need a sponsor for doing that.
> 
> Let's try to wait for Xavier to see whether he would be kind enough
> to
> upload your patches (or somebody else from debian-ada, I know nothing
> about ada, I'd prefer to see somebody from the team…), otherwise I am
> available to sponsor them.
>

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

Xavier: ping!

>From Aug 31:
> I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
> unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:11 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-
> > > > 6. With these
> > > > patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> > > > 
> > > >   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
> > > > New debian patches: debian_control.patch,
> > > > debian_rules.patch,
> > > > debian_patches_series.patch
> > > > New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
> > > > examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> > > > Modified patches: hardening.patch
> > > Do you mind uploading a fixed polyorb?  (a NMU, I suppose).
> > 
> > I'm not a DD/DM, so I need a sponsor for doing that.
> 
> Let's try to wait for Xavier to see whether he would be kind enough
> to
> upload your patches (or somebody else from debian-ada, I know nothing
> about ada, I'd prefer to see somebody from the team…), otherwise I am
> available to sponsor them.
> 

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > 
> > > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With 
> > > these
> > > patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> > > 
> > >   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
> > > New debian patches: debian_control.patch, debian_rules.patch,
> > > debian_patches_series.patch
> > > New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
> > > examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> > > Modified patches: hardening.patch
> > Do you mind uploading a fixed polyorb?  (a NMU, I suppose).
> 
> I'm not a DD/DM, so I need a sponsor for doing that.

Let's try to wait for Xavier to see whether he would be kind enough to
upload your patches (or somebody else from debian-ada, I know nothing
about ada, I'd prefer to see somebody from the team…), otherwise I am
available to sponsor them.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 12:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > 
> > With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With these
> > patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> > 
> >   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
> > New debian patches: debian_control.patch, debian_rules.patch,
> > debian_patches_series.patch
> > New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
> > examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> > Modified patches: hardening.patch
> Do you mind uploading a fixed polyorb?  (a NMU, I suppose).

I'm not a DD/DM, so I need a sponsor for doing that.

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote:
> > Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
> > I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.

I wonder whether that should have been an O instead..
but your call.

> With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With these
> patches all serious bugs are fixed.
> 
>   * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
> New debian patches: debian_control.patch, debian_rules.patch,
> debian_patches_series.patch
> New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
> examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
> Modified patches: hardening.patch

Do you mind uploading a fixed polyorb?  (a NMU, I suppose).

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Svante Signell]

On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:34 +0200, xavier grave wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
> 
> Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
> I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.
> 
> Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier
> 
> Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> > 
> > source: polyorb
> > version: 2.11~20140418-3
> > severity: serious
> > 
> > Dear maintainer,
> > 
> > polyorb is the last package using gnat-4.9 for building, which means
> > it's the last package holding gnat-4.9 clean removal.
> > 
> > I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
> > unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).
> > 
> > I wonder if these are signs that calls the removal of the packge.
> > 
> > If I don't receive any reply from you in 2 weeks I'll reassign this bug
> > to ftpmaster to proceed with the removal.

Hi,

With the attached patches polyorb builds fine with gcc-6/gnat-6. With these
patches all serious bugs are fixed.

  * Enable build with gnat-6: Closes #790664, #831255, #835966
New debian patches: debian_control.patch, debian_rules.patch,
debian_patches_series.patch
New source patches: src_csupport.c.patch,
examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
Modified patches: hardening.patch

BTW: This version is old, but upstream there seems to be a later version
available: 2.12.1 from 2015 and the latest commit is from February 2016,
mentioning version 17.0.

Thanks!--- a/examples/corba/echo/echo-impl.adb.orig	2014-03-20 21:52:43.0 +0100
+++ b/examples/corba/echo/echo-impl.adb		2016-09-02 12:11:41.916884091 +0200
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
  S (L - 2 .. L) := (others => '.');
   end if;
   Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line
-("Echoing string: « " & S (S'First .. L) & " »");
+("Echoing string: << " & S (S'First .. L) & " >>");
   return Mesg;
end EchoString;
 
--- b/debian/patches/series.orig	2014-09-26 15:00:26.0 +0200
+++ a/debian/patches/series		2016-09-01 16:44:19.089690966 +0200
@@ -43,3 +43,5 @@
 xe_back-polyorb.adb.patch
 support-tilde-in-pathname.patch
 make-clean.patch
+src_csupport.c.patch
+examples_corba_echo_echo-impl.adb.patch
Index: polyorb-2.11~20140418/src/csupport.c
===
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418.orig/src/csupport.c
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/src/csupport.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 /* C support functions for PolyORB */
 
 #include "config.h"
+#include 
 
 #ifdef HAVE_FCNTL_H
 #include 
Index: polyorb-2.11~20140418/Makefile.in
===
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418.orig/Makefile.in
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/Makefile.in
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # Main PolyORB Makefile
 
+include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
+
 .PHONY: default
 default: all
 
@@ -70,7 +72,7 @@ GPRBUILD_FOR_TARGET	:= @GPRBUILD_FOR_TAR
 # the command line if needed. Also, need to specify PARALLEL_GNATMAKE_FLAGS
 # before GNATMAKE_FLAGS, otherwise this variable is simply ignored.
 CFLAGS  = @CFLAGS@
-ADAFLAGS= @ADAFLAGS@
+ADAFLAGS+= @ADAFLAGS@
 CPPFLAGS= @CPPFLAGS@
 PARALLEL_GNATMAKE_FLAGS = -j0
 EXTRA_GNATMAKE_FLAGS= @EXTRA_GNATMAKE_FLAGS@
@@ -93,7 +95,7 @@ COMP_TOOLS_GNATMAKE_FLAGS := @STYLE_SWIT
 LIBRARY_TYPE_OPTION   := -XLIBRARY_TYPE=static
 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET := @CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET@
 ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET   := @ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET@
-GNATMAKE_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET := $(LIBRARY_TYPE_OPTION) -cargs ${ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET}
+GNATMAKE_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET := $(LIBRARY_TYPE_OPTION) -cargs ${ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET} -largs $(LDFLAGS)
 
 # Feature substitutions
 
@@ -228,11 +230,11 @@ build-iac \
 : build-%:
 	mkdir -p compilers/${compiler_dir} && \
 	  cd compilers/${compiler_dir} && \
-	  ${GNATMAKE} -m \
+	  ${GNATMAKE} $(ADAFLAGS) -m \
 	   $*.adb \
 	   ${COMP_TOOLS_GNATMAKE_FLAGS} \
 	   -I${top_srcdir}/compilers/${compiler_dir} \
-	   ${PRJ_GNATMAKE_FLAGS} -bargs -E
+	   ${PRJ_GNATMAKE_FLAGS} -bargs -E -largs $(LDFLAGS)
 # Binder switch -E causes traceback information to be included in
 # Exception_Occurrences.
 
@@ -240,7 +242,7 @@ build-po_gnatdist:
 	mkdir -p compilers/${compiler_dir} && \
 	  cd compilers/${compiler_dir} && \
 	  ADA_PROJECT_PATH="${top_builddir}/projects${PATH_SEP}${top_srcdir}/projects${PATH_SEP}$$ADA_PROJECT_PATH" \
-	  ${GNATMAKE} -p -m -P compilers_gnatdist
+	  ${GNATMAKE} -p $(ADAFLAGS) -m -P compilers_gnatdist -largs $(LDFLAGS)
 
 # The following variables are used for invoking idlac. There is a static
 # pattern rule for each; see "Rules for running idlac", below. Each file
Index: polyorb-2.11~20140418/projects/polyorb_common.gpr
===
--- polyorb-2.11~20140418.orig/projects/polyorb_common.gpr
+++ polyorb-2.11~20140418/projects/polyorb_common.gpr
@@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ project PolyORB_Common is
 
type Library_Type_Type is ("relocatable", "static");
Library_Type : Library_Type_Type := external 

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[xavier grave]

Hi Mattia,

Sadly, I haven't time for maintaining work anymore.
I have filed a RFA (#834605) against wnpp.

Thanks for your concern, cordially, xavier

Le 29/08/2016 à 16:30, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :

source: polyorb
version: 2.11~20140418-3
severity: serious

Dear maintainer,

polyorb is the last package using gnat-4.9 for building, which means
it's the last package holding gnat-4.9 clean removal.

I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).

I wonder if these are signs that calls the removal of the packge.

If I don't receive any reply from you in 2 weeks I'll reassign this bug
to ftpmaster to proceed with the removal.

Bug#835966: RM: polyorb -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

[Mattia Rizzolo]

source: polyorb
version: 2.11~20140418-3
severity: serious

Dear maintainer,

polyorb is the last package using gnat-4.9 for building, which means
it's the last package holding gnat-4.9 clean removal.

I don't see any activity going on this package, and it already has 2
unaswered RC bugs (#790664 from half 2015).

I wonder if these are signs that calls the removal of the packge.

If I don't receive any reply from you in 2 weeks I'll reassign this bug
to ftpmaster to proceed with the removal.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature