Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

Am 18.04.2018 um 19:55 schrieb Pino Toscano: > In data mercoledì 18 aprile 2018 19:35:01 CEST, Michael Biebl ha scritto: >> Control: tags -1 + patch >> >> I made some more minor tweaks to v2: >> >> - Update debian/changelog >> - Drop debian/patches/add_glib_for_nm, no longer necessary >> >> v3 of

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

In data mercoledì 18 aprile 2018 19:35:01 CEST, Michael Biebl ha scritto: > Control: tags -1 + patch > > I made some more minor tweaks to v2: > > - Update debian/changelog > - Drop debian/patches/add_glib_for_nm, no longer necessary > > v3 of the debdiff is attached. I was told that it's

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

Control: tags -1 + patch I made some more minor tweaks to v2: - Update debian/changelog - Drop debian/patches/add_glib_for_nm, no longer necessary v3 of the debdiff is attached. I was told that it's probably not worth forwarding this upstream, as KDE4 development is pretty much dormant. I plan

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:32:30 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 14.04.2018 um 15:21 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > > I tried updating solid-networkstartus to use QT_NO_KEYWORDS and the Q_ > > macros, but ran into a problem. The QNtrack headers use the slots > > keyword, so if I set

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

Am 14.04.2018 um 15:21 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I tried updating solid-networkstartus to use QT_NO_KEYWORDS and the Q_ > macros, but ran into a problem. The QNtrack headers use the slots > keyword, so if I set -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS, > solid-networkstatus/kded/ntracknetworkstate.cpp fails to compile. >

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

Am 14.04.2018 um 14:07 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 14.04.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:58:16 +0100 Lubomir Rintel wrote: >>> This doesn't seem to build with current libnm and glib, perhaps because >>> "signals" is a reserved word in MOC? > >> >>

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

Am 14.04.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Michael Biebl: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:58:16 +0100 Lubomir Rintel wrote: >> This doesn't seem to build with current libnm and glib, perhaps because >> "signals" is a reserved word in MOC? > > That said, I'm not really familiar with Qt, so not sure

Bug#862883: Port from libnm-glib/libnm-util to libnm

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:58:16 +0100 Lubomir Rintel wrote: > This doesn't seem to build with current libnm and glib, perhaps because > "signals" is a reserved word in MOC? > > Build log: > > In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qobject.h:47:0, > >