On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:03:30PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 5 August 2017 23:31:33 CEST, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> >I planned to break things by disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1, which I
> >might upload soon. I guess I can fix that at the same time.
>
> Do you intend a
On 5 August 2017 23:31:33 CEST, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>I planned to break things by disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1, which I
>might upload soon. I guess I can fix that at the same time.
Do you intend a transition like we had for SSLv2 removal or do you plan just to
disable it? I
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 09:03:41PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream pending
> control: forwaded -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/3562
>
> On 2017-07-27 19:06:19 [-0700], Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > It appears so. (Though I did have to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 869856 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/3562
Bug #869856 [src:openssl] openssl: FTBFS: Testsuite failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/3562'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch fixed-upstream pending
Bug #869856 [src:openssl] openssl: FTBFS: Testsuite failures
Added tag(s) patch, pending, and fixed-upstream.
> forwaded -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/3562
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream pending
control: forwaded -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/3562
On 2017-07-27 19:06:19 [-0700], Daniel Schepler wrote:
> It appears so. (Though I did have to apply it by hand as there was no
> "clientsession" line for patch to sync to in hunk
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Does the attached patch fix it?
It appears so. (Though I did have to apply it by hand as there was no
"clientsession" line for patch to sync to in hunk #2.)
--
Daniel Schepler
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:14:45AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Is that reproducible?
>
> Yes, it's definitely reproducible on my machine.
Does the attached patch fix it?
Kurt
>From
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Is that reproducible?
Yes, it's definitely reproducible on my machine.
--
Daniel Schepler
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:18:32PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: openssl
> Version: 1.1.0f-3
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
>
> ...
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> ../../test/recipes/70-test_sslrecords.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 0)
>
Source: openssl
Version: 1.1.0f-3
Severity: serious
>From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
...
Test Summary Report
---
../../test/recipes/70-test_sslrecords.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Tests out of sequence. Found (5) but expected (4)
11 matches
Mail list logo