Hi,
On 10/03/18 00:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Thanks. This FTBFS bug is still serious, but even better, you can
close it.
I was going to keep this bug open for the underlying JIT-on-mips issue :)
I don't see the new version at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pcre2/commits/master. Is it on
Hi,
This is blocking git updates from migrating to testing
(https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=git), so my preference
would be removing "mips mipsel mips64el" from the list of JIT arches
for now as a stopgap.
Done and uploaded, so I've downgraded this bug to important.
Regards,
On 9 March 2018 18:47:25 GMT+00:00, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Matthew Vernon wrote:
>> On 09/03/18 15:20, James Cowgill wrote:
>
>>> Source: pcre2
>>> Version: 10.31-1
>>> Severity: serious
>[...]
>>> pcre2 FTBFS on mips* with lots of testsuite failures. It looks to me
Hi,
Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 09/03/18 15:20, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Source: pcre2
>> Version: 10.31-1
>> Severity: serious
[...]
>> pcre2 FTBFS on mips* with lots of testsuite failures. It looks to me
>> like the JIT is bust.
>>
>> I forwarded the log upstream to the above address. I'll try
Hi,
On 09/03/18 15:20, James Cowgill wrote:
Source: pcre2
Version: 10.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
Forwarded: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2254
Hi,
pcre2 FTBFS on mips* with lots of testsuite failures. It looks to me
like the JIT is bust.
I forwarded the log upstream to
Source: pcre2
Version: 10.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
Forwarded: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2254
Hi,
pcre2 FTBFS on mips* with lots of testsuite failures. It looks to me
like the JIT is bust.
I forwarded the log upstream to the above address. I'll try to take a
look at
6 matches
Mail list logo