the link to the Bit torent of the 3.1r5 doesn't seem to be working, on any
of the different architectures. Although i have found a link for 4.0r0 which
is not stable yet according to the main debain news site. if you can help
that would be cool. the link i am trying to use is
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:09:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 08 April 2007 01:25, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I think we've grown too much to claim that anything after disc#1 is
just special-interest. Is there better wording for this?
Yes, I agree.
Maybe: It is unlikely that you will
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Logan Rah wrote:
the link to the Bit torent of the 3.1r5 doesn't seem to be working, on any
of the different architectures. Although i have found a link for 4.0r0 which
is not stable yet according to the main debain news site. if you can help
that would be cool. the link i
On Sunday 08 April 2007 14:52, Richard Atterer wrote:
But maybe these days even two CDs is not enough for a full desktop
install??
I'm not sure. I've never looked very much at CD2. I'd expect that all the
actual GNOME desktop stuff is on CD2. What would be nice to determine is
if all packages
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please add the MD5SUMS, MD5SUMS.sign, SHA1SUMS and SHA1SUMS.sign files
from
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/
to
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dvd/
so people that choose the BT method can easily
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Finally: what are we testing?
=
*grin* The all-important question. Basic answer is: as much as
possible. We have quite a large matrix of tests to cover:
* Check the businesscard CD, the netinst CD, normal CD#1, KDE CD,
xfce CD and DVD#1,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:46:16AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:03:34AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
As this page is owned and maintained by the d-i project, this mail
should have gone to the debian-boot list and not d-cd or d-www.
Moving the mail there for proper
On Sunday 08 April 2007 19:36, Robert Millan wrote:
Just about time. Please, can you consider doing this change really
soon for www.d.o/CD/ (before we miss the just-released effect) ?
As has been explained to you on IRC a while back, the multi-arch images
are NOT the perfect, to be preferred
I'm trying to create the iso images for etch with jigdo-mirror. I
used rsync to get the .jigdo and .template files from cdimage.d.o.
However when I run the script all iso images abort with the
following log (this is for alpha):
2007-04-08 16:49:09: imageDir:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:49:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 08 April 2007 19:36, Robert Millan wrote:
Just about time. Please, can you consider doing this change really
soon for www.d.o/CD/ (before we miss the just-released effect) ?
As has been explained to you on IRC a while
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Larry bradford wrote:
i would like a CD copy of Lindows.
Unfortunately, you've posted to the wrong place. This mailing list
is primarily for Debian developers to discuss how to
build/develop/contents of the Debian installation CDs and problems with
Looking at this portion of jigdo-mirror,
# If possible, check md5sum of template data
if test $templateMD5; then
set -- `$jigdoFile md5sum --report=quiet template`
if test $1 = $templateMD5; then
log Template checksum is correct
else
log
I'm still trying to create .iso using jigdo-mirror. Removing
--no-check-files from the default made it proceed, however some CDs
and DVDs don't build because it complains about missing files.
How can one see which files are missing? I took the list from the
jigdo of one of the CDs that doesn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
