>> An alternative is to have "virtual ISO images", i.e. images which are
>> constructed on the fly (presumably by jigdo) on the web-server side.
> Assuming that a complete set of ISOs for whatever medium occupies
> at most 100 GB, it seems better to have the images ready rather than to
> assemble
> Thank you Thomas. Yes, that's obviously why it was done.So - a quick look
> on Wikipedia suggests that this was a current machine in 2006 and was
> replaced in 2007 / 2008. So - if anyone has one running anywhere, it's
> somewhere between 12-15 years old. If anybody knows of any that they really
2 matches
Mail list logo
