Previously jason andrade wrote:
perhaps this isn't exactly the right forum but i'm not sure who
looks after pandora aka the machine which makes non-US and security
available via rsync.
That is satie, not pandora
it's been spitting out 10 users connected full rsync messages
for a couple of
Previously Richard Atterer wrote:
There's a backup of the files at
http://cdimage.debian.org/~atterer/jigdo-backup/jigdo/. My uni's
sysadmins are usually pretty quick - if it isn't fixed soon, I'll make
www/jigdo-cd/ point to the backup.
Would it make sense to move these to some debian.org
http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/ tells me to download jigdo from
http://home.in.tum.de/~atterer/jigdo/, but tje jigdo-lite download
links on that page all point to non-existing files.
Can someone please fix that?
Wichert.
--
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Yes. I asked Anne Bezemer (who patched debian-cd to support that) to
document it but he never did it.
export SECURITY=/mirror/security.debian.org
What does debian-cd use the security mirror for? You might want to know
that the structure for
Since I don't know the answer to this one I'll cc debian-boot and
debian-cd in the hope somewhere there can answer this.
Wichert.
Previously Paul Stoeber wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Are you running rpc.statd on the client?
That makes locking
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
The good news is that TeX is in, the bad news is that packages such as
xdm, xfs xterm are out. This seems bad, but I suppose since gdm kdm
are on there, and one can survive without xfs, and gnome-terminal is in,
we could actually live without those, but will
Previously Christian T. Steigies wrote:
These days? Do you think everybody is using w**d, or is there something
else you can use for writing papers, books, letters, faxes, creating posters?
For scientific documents *TeX is still pretty much the only real
solution, but with scientific community
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
Eh? cdimage.d.o will be redirecting to that when it's all polished up
(shouldn't be too long now).
Most of the images on the header seem to be missing..
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Richard Atterer wrote:
over the last days, I've finished the work on the new cdimage website,
the result can be viewed at http://cdimage.debian.org/~atterer/.
Comments welcome!
I really like the content, but I'ld rather see it having the same
look as the rest of the debian.org
Previously Richard Atterer wrote:
How do people like it? Does it stand any chance of eventually
replacing http://cdimage.debian.org/?
I already like it a lot more then the current maze.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
What do other people think about that ?
Ditch it.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Tobias Frech wrote:
Would it be possible for me to customize the debian distribution in a way,
that after downloading a install disk or burning a install CD they only need
to go through the installation process and end up with a ready-to-run
application server machine ?
Previously Justin F. Knotzke wrote:
I have done all except create the so called Packages file. How do
I do that?
dpkg-scanpackages or apt-ftparchive.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently
Previously Ross wrote:
When will debian release a stable version of the 2.4 kernel ?
Not before 2.4 itself becomes stable.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Stephen Kasirye wrote:
I am looking for Debian 1.3 release. I am looking for a Debian CD or
preferably the Debian 1.3 official CD image.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
As far as I know we don't have those CD images online anymore. The
complete archive is still available at
Previously Nate Duehr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2.
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
Considering he said `in release order'
Slight change in the script:
Previously [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@echo off
echo Flush any write-cached disk blocks before we leave DOS.
echo If your system does not use smartdrv an error message will appear;
echo you can safely ignore that.
smartdrv /c
Wichert.
--
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Uh, well, you mean hda to hdc? Plus SCSI drives, etc etc. Oh, ick.
There must be a better way.
grub uses a different naming scheme for drives: so (hd1) means the
whole first IDE disk (ie /dev/hda).
Wichert.
--
Previously Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
May I know where to get md5sum for a FreeBSD system;
or its source code?
There is source for md5sum in the dpkg sourcetree.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore
Previously [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That brings up a dos window with whatever magical fix done.
The `magical' fix is simply that command.com will allocate more
space for the environment. The default is 256 bytes iirc.
Wichert.
--
Previously J.A. Bezemer wrote:
On
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=yespkg=cd-images
Try cd-image instead of cd-images.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
|
Previously Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:05:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:05:18PM +0200, Michael Schlueter wrote:
Hi,
as discribed in the BTS the Package format has changes a bit (Filename is now
FileName). Here is the Patch to make
Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
i386 build of the CVS boot-floppies as of yesterday is available at
URL:http://auric.debian.org/~aph/bf/2.2.17/.
Please note that the 2.2.17 kernel is basically ready as well, Alan Cox
is just waiting for Linus to make it official. We should get that
in 2.2.r1
Previously Philip Hands wrote:
Shouldn't that be 2.2 r1?
The first revision will be 2.2r1, but we'll do a second revision
as well at some point.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience
Can someone please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as soon
as i386 and source CD images for TC3 are finished? Bradley kindly
agreed to produce TC3 CDs for us so we can hand them out at LinuxWorld,
but he needs the images quickly seens LinuxWorld isn't very far away..
Also please tell him
Previously J.A. Bezemer wrote:
forcd1: When we discussed kernel-source not long ago, Raphael said that anyone
could commit such little changes. When I saw it hadn't been done yet, I did
it myself.
Forcing new application on CD 1 is not a `little thing'. And if you
do that for applications
26 matches
Mail list logo
