Bug#655070: marked as done (cdrom: lilo installer forgot to include the initial ramdisk)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:24:18 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#655070: cdrom: lilo installer forgot to include the initial ramdisk has caused the Debian Bug report #655070, regarding cdrom: lilo installer forgot to include the initial ramdisk to be marked as done.

Bug#409218: marked as done (one of three cdimage.d.o has different timezone from other two)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:13:05 +0100 with message-id <2ed23f75bc6436f8103f8062574c5836a0890883.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#409218: one of three cdimage.d.o has different timezone from other two has caused the Debian Bug report #409218, regarding one of three

New debian-cd mirror in Rabat, Morocco

Hi, We’d like to be listed as a mirror for Debian CD Images, please find information about the mirror below: Org: MARWAN Website: https://marwan.ma Contact: noc[at]marwan[dot]ma Bandwidth: 10Gbps Location: Rabat Country: MA Mirror URLs: http://mirror.marwan.ma/debian-cd/

Bug#1051445: syslinux.efi crashes on isohybrid boot as cdrom

Hi, congrats for solving this long standing problem. A few years ago this would have been great news for Knoppix, which staid for quite a while with SYSLINUX for EFI. But somewhere between versions 8.6 (2019) and 9.3 (2022) it switched to GRUB. Although the most recent commit on

Bug#1051445: syslinux.efi crashes on isohybrid boot as cdrom

Package: syslinux-efi Version: 6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1 The use case of a hybrid ISO where an EFI partition with syslinux.efi is set up as El Torrito boot option, all duly equipped. works fine when the media is provided as disk drive, but not when the same media is provided as cdrom drive.

Swedish Translation complete for tasksel Debconf and where to send these?

Hello! Started continuing with some translations of debconf files during the first day of Debconf Attached the first one i am done with now is there a good place to send these, to not spam the mailinglist? Also how should they be named forgot as it was a couple of years ago i did this, can take

Upcoming stable (12.2) and oldstable (11.8) point releases

The next point releases for "bookworm" (12.2) and "bullseye" (11.8) will take place on Saturday, October 7th 2023. Processing of new uploads into the relevant queues will be frozen the preceding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Hi Birzhan, Unfortunately it's all legal, the debian social contract was even officially changed to make this degradation real - justifying once again the reason why GNU community is not supporting debian project: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch06s04 Cheers! Martin On

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

Will try to help on that date :) Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 19:27 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire : > > > >Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are > > >options. Please indicate your availability for those three. > > Right, 7th October seems to be the one. Usual

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:53:07AM -0700, Birzhan Amirov wrote: > > If you actually want the level of purity-over-practicality that your mail > suggests ... that is effectively an abuse of our users > **Just pointing out the fact that at the time of 11.6.0 you didn't have a > problem releasing

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

> >Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are > >options. Please indicate your availability for those three. Right, 7th October seems to be the one. Usual confirmations to follow. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

> If you actually want the level of purity-over-practicality that your mail suggests ... that is effectively an abuse of our users **Just pointing out the fact that at the time of 11.6.0 you didn't have a problem releasing both free and non-free version.** Important part ^ Also, it feels like in

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Hi, Philip Hands wrote: > While looking at the FSF site, I noticed this somewhat amusing method > for reconciling these two stances: > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/install-fest-devil.html Typically Stallman: "My new idea is that the install fest could allow the devil to hang around, off

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Birzhan Amirov writes: > I just want to use this chance to thank the entire Debian Images Team for > many years of releasing DVDs that actually had 0 bytes of closed-source > code. > I have been following the project since "Jessie", and always admired your > strict and puristic approach. > Allow

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

I just want to use this chance to thank the entire Debian Images Team for many years of releasing DVDs that actually had 0 bytes of closed-source code. I have been following the project since "Jessie", and always admired your strict and puristic approach. Allow me to wish you the best of luck

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Birzhan Amirov writes: > Hello, > > Thank you for your quick and detailed reply. > >> I suppose that we could provide a tool that would be able produce an > image with no non-free data on it ... but the effort required to build and > test such a tool would have to be diverted from other tasks.

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Also, should this wikipedia article be updated? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:55 AM Birzhan Amirov wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your quick and detailed reply. > > > I suppose that we could provide a tool that would be able produce

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Hello, Thank you for your quick and detailed reply. > I suppose that we could provide a tool that would be able produce an image with no non-free data on it ... but the effort required to build and test such a tool would have to be diverted from other tasks. > ... to contribute to such an

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 04:38:58PM -0700, Birzhan Amirov wrote: ... >> Do you have an `Official` way to de-poison your release, and if so, is it >> published as a document? >> > > You can pass various parameters to the installer: you can also uninstall the >

New mirror in Japan for debian-cd

Hi all, To support free software, I've set up a mirror for debian-cd using the provided script. No daily/weekly builds. Name: repo.jing.rocks Admin: Jing Luo or Geolocation: Tokyo, Japan Bandwidth: 10Gbit/s IPv6: yes URL: http://repo.jing.rocks/debian-cd/ https://repo.jing.rocks/debian-cd/

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 04:38:58PM -0700, Birzhan Amirov wrote: > Additionally, > > I've just checked the DVDs of 12.1.0 and 11.6.0, and it looks like all the > DVDs of 12.1.0 are labeled like the following: > `Debian GNU/Linux 12.1.0 _Bookworm_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-{X} with > firmware

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Additionally, I've just checked the DVDs of 12.1.0 and 11.6.0, and it looks like all the DVDs of 12.1.0 are labeled like the following: `Debian GNU/Linux 12.1.0 _Bookworm_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-{X} with firmware 20230722-10:49`, where X is the DVD number. --- However, the releases of

Re: Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 04:12:02PM -0700, Birzhan Amirov wrote: > Hello Debian CD Images team. > > I decided to switch to the latest version (12.1.0), and encountered the > following issues: > > 1) Looks like this DVD image: > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/ >

Free Software DVD contains non-free firmware

Hello Debian CD Images team. I decided to switch to the latest version (12.1.0), and encountered the following issues: 1) Looks like this DVD image: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Holger Wansing (2023-08-27): > So no more netinst images, And any other sections about CD, DVD, etc. must go. > but the "Other images" section will stay (netboot images, hd-media > ...)? Right, only that one stays. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, Am 27. August 2023 20:33:31 MESZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : >Holger Wansing (2023-08-27): >> Am 27. August 2023 10:12:09 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing >> : >> >Hi, >> > >> >Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing >> >: >> >OTOH I would then remove the i386 link from >>

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Holger Wansing (2023-08-27): > Am 27. August 2023 10:12:09 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing > : > >Hi, > > > >Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing > >: > >Ah, sorry. > >By accident I found a bug against release-notes, which documents that > >i386 d-i images will be dropped for

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, Am 27. August 2023 10:12:09 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >Hi, > >Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >Ah, sorry. >By accident I found a bug against release-notes, which documents that >i386 d-i images will be dropped for trixie.

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >Hi, > >I noticed that the link to the daily built netinst image for i386 is "Not >found" currently: > >on

Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, I noticed that the link to the daily built netinst image for i386 is "Not found" currently: on The directory is not existing. Is this a known

Re: Debian 9 live-cd standards iso missing

Hi Florian, On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:00:07PM +, Florian Holzbauer wrote: >Dear Debian Image Team, > >I relied on the standards iso live-cd iso files for some automated kernel >testing. >Why is there no standard isos available for stretch? > >Archive Path (e.g. 9.0.0, but affects all 9.x):

Debian 9 live-cd standards iso missing

Dear Debian Image Team, I relied on the standards iso live-cd iso files for some automated kernel testing. Why is there no standard isos available for stretch? Archive Path (e.g. 9.0.0, but affects all 9.x): https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/9.0.0-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/ Full

Bug#1050284: cdrom: with a ryzen 3 3200 g the scren become unreadable

Package: cdrom Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: edgard.dev...@gmx.fr Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was

Problem on https://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/adding-form.it.html

Hi, I don't know if this is the right place and if so I apologize. I wanted to point out that when I try to update my data using: https://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/adding-form.it.html it gives me this error message: also add USB to the CD and DVD list The following information was collected:

Re: Windows tool to make bootable USB sticks

Good morning Steve, I have used Rufus for over 10 years and it's my go-to tool. Here are some other suggestions if you are in the market for a utility; - UNetbootin - This tool is widely used for creating bootable USB drives from various Linux distributions. It offers a simple interface and

Re: Windows tool to make bootable USB sticks

Hey! Have used Rufus several times myself, during the past year (months) at dayjob to flash Debian isos from Windows 10 and 11 and has worked great :) Den ons 9 aug. 2023 kl 17:21 skrev Steve K. : > > Hi Debian, > > On your website[1] there is mentioned a list of tools to create bootable USB >

Windows tool to make bootable USB sticks

Hi Debian, On your website[1] there is mentioned a list of tools to create bootable USB drives in Windows. Some of the listed tools are closed source software, or even adware, and the Microsoft URL leads to an HTTP 404. Because the list ends with asking for other programs, I'd like to bring to

Re: i386 in Debian 13 Trixie

On 7 August 2023 18:22:09 BST, M Goppold wrote: Greetings People!! Seems in the testing cd-s, I dont see i386 at all anymore. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ I tried web searches to find out the status of debian and i386.  But I couldnt find any information.  Maybe its due

i386 in Debian 13 Trixie

Greetings People!! Seems in the testing cd-s, I dont see i386 at all anymore. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ I tried web searches to find out the status of debian and i386.  But I couldnt find any information.  Maybe its due to the deterioration of some search engines. Is

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. I originally suggested: Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September > 2023. Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) > 7 Oct

Fwd: debian image questions

-- Forwarded message - Från: ghostbar Date: tors 3 aug. 2023 kl 14:35 Subject: Re: debian image questions To: On 8/2/23 21:40, Bill Miller wrote: > I really want to try Debian but i dont live in the 90's CDs and USB > drives times. why cant i just install Debian from a digital

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

Apologies, I don't think I've responded to this yet :-( On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:25:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. > >I originally suggested: > >Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): >> The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2

Fwd: New upstream stable update for next point release for bullseye?

-- Forwarded message - Från: Andrew Lee Date: tis 1 aug. 2023 kl 12:17 Subject: New upstream stable update for next point release for bullseye? To: Dear Debian kernel team, Thank you for your contribution to Debian. I recently saw the Zenbleed issue fixed in

sudo binary missing after live-build image installation

Hello, After hearing all the praises for bookworm, I built and installed my first-ever Debian instance. During the installation, I was prompted to enter a superuser password and I skipped this step. I know then the first user I created will have administrator privileges by using the sudo command

Re: Debian ISO Testing

Martin McCarthy writes: > 4) Automation. I read a thread on this mailing list recently talking > about openQA and whilst I am not opposed to automatic testing by > machines, I would insist that the manual testers are still retained as > relying solely on machines for QA can be problematic

Re: Debian ISO Testing

Hi Martin! On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Martin McCarthy wrote: > >I'm very pleased to be involved in the Debian project. Thank you for having >me. Let me introduce myself. I'm Martin, I am a developer based in Manchester >in the UK and I've recently decided to dive head first into

Re: Debian ISO Testing

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:52:29PM +0100, Martin McCarthy wrote: > Dear Debian team, > > I'm very pleased to be involved in the Debian project. Thank you for having > me. Let me introduce myself. I'm Martin, I am a developer based in > Manchester in the UK and I've recently decided to dive head

Debian ISO Testing

Dear Debian team, I'm very pleased to be involved in the Debian project. Thank you for having me. Let me introduce myself. I'm Martin, I am a developer based in Manchester in the UK and I've recently decided to dive head first into the wonderful world of FOSS. I have been in the Microsoft

Re: UHD-BD

Hi, griffin tucker wrote: > not just useful for debian or linux distros, but any consecutively > named .iso9660 files I assume that the script merge_debian_isos is mainly usable with a set of ISOs made by the debian-cd package. The files of which the content gets manipulated are probably

Re: UHD-BD

very useful, thanks thomas not just useful for debian or linux distros, but any consecutively named .iso9660 files On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 19:21, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > griffin tucker wrote: > > are there any plans to introduce triple-layer blu-rays for debian? > > I guess not: >

Re: UHD-BD

Hi, griffin tucker wrote: > are there any plans to introduce triple-layer blu-rays for debian? I guess not: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011343 But there is a workaround: https://wiki.debian.org/MergeDebianIsos Possibly it is not yet tested with Debian 12. So reports

UHD-BD

hi, are there any plans to introduce triple-layer blu-rays for debian? it'd be nice to have everything fit (currently just over 80gb) in one .iso9660 file even if it's just the .jigdo files and hashes that are distributed, it'd be nice to have this as an official .iso9660 file for

Re: Automating testing for the netinst and live images

Roland Clobus writes: > Hello Debian-cd Team and Phil, > > Now that the busy period for releasing Debian 12.1 is over and some of > the live images have been verified by openQA (via me), would it make > sense to think about automating the tests for the officially released > Debian images, and

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

Hey! i promised to answer this email when i had some spare time, can help out if the testing happens in October, kinda busy with other things by the end of September Den ons 28 juni 2023 kl 14:40 skrev Steve McIntyre : > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >

Re: Push in git repo missing?

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello Debian-cd Team, > >now that 12.1 has been released, is a push to the git repository at Salsa >missing? >The file `available/CONF.sh.bookworm_release` still mentions 12.0.0 Pushed now, thanks for the prod... -- Steve McIntyre,

Automating testing for the netinst and live images

Hello Debian-cd Team and Phil, Now that the busy period for releasing Debian 12.1 is over and some of the live images have been verified by openQA (via me), would it make sense to think about automating the tests for the officially released Debian images, and the weekly builds as well? My

Push in git repo missing?

Hello Debian-cd Team, now that 12.1 has been released, is a push to the git repository at Salsa missing? The file `available/CONF.sh.bookworm_release` still mentions 12.0.0 With kind regards, Roland Clobus OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1042037: syslinux: FTBFS: main.c:33:8: error: unknown type name ‘jmp_buf’

Source: syslinux Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -I/usr/include/efi -I/usr/include/efi/ia32

Fast and Professional Estimating Services

Hello, We provide accurate cost estimates and takeoffs for building projects. Interested in getting a quote from us? Feel free to send us the PDF set of plans. Let me know if you would like to know more. Best Regards, Amanda Sidney Business Development Manager Estimating Solutions, LLC

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

On 7/24/23 14:25, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. I originally suggested: Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

On Mon, 24, Jul, 2023 at 07:25:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. > Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are > options. Please indicate your availability for those three. I can do any of the above for ftp. Mark -- Mark Hymers signature.asc

11.8/12.2 planning

I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. I originally suggested: Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September > 2023. Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) > 7 Oct Let's say

Processed: block 1040899 [debian-cd] debian-cd: "Failed to mount /target/proc" during GRUB installation

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package debian-cd Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-cd' Limit currently set to 'package':'debian-cd' > block 1040899 by 1031183 Bug #1040899 [debian-cd] debian-cd: "Failed to mount /target/proc" during GRUB

Re: New cd-mirror in Greece

Please, ignore my previous request for mirroning CD-debian. Regards, K. On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:52 AM Konstantinos Draziotis wrote: > Hello, > I hope this message finds you well. > I'd like to let you know that I have successfully set up a mirror > (http/https > server) in Greece for

Re: Mini-DebConf in Cambridge, UK - November 23-26 2023

Hello! Might come if the Debian project can help me pay for travel and hotel/accommodation RattusRattus promised to email me when he have time to i can apply (during the Debian 12.1 release ISO test yesterday afternoon) Den lör 8 juli 2023 kl 18:25 skrev Steve McIntyre : > > Hi! > > I'm

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.1)

Hey! Great job everyone on the release! did help some myself too, will email about dates in September-October for the next releases when i have it a bit more calmer in the mid of August, also might go to Cambridge not sure yet waiting for an email from RattusRattus :) Den ons 28 juni 2023 kl

Bug#1041500: amd64 installation images cannot install a signed 32-bit UEFI boot loader

Package: debian-cd Version: 20230607 Dear maintainer, Installation ISO images for amd64 can boot on 32-bit EFI with secure boot enabled but only install an unsigned 32-bit EFI boot loader so the installed system will be unbootable with secure boot enabled. Causes: -

Bug#1040899: debian-cd: "Failed to mount /target/proc" during GRUB installation

syslog reactivated using instructions from #1039710 Jul 19 08:24:08 main-menu[256]: INFO: Menu item 'grub-installer' selected Jul 19 08:24:08 Success mounting /target/proc Jul 19 08:24:08 Success mounting /target/sys Jul 19 08:24:09 error: Error creating /target/sys/firmware/efi/efivars Jul 19

Re: Request to enable Mirror for public Use

Hi, Is there any update on this? On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:12 PM AltusHost wrote: > Hi, > > Could you kindly review and enable these mirrors on your official site for > public use? > > NL: https://mirror.nl.altushost.com/debian-cd/ && > https://mirror.nl.altushost.com/debian > > SE:

Bug#1040899: debian-cd: "Failed to mount /target/proc" during GRUB installation

Control: affects 1039710 debian-cd On 12/07/2023 09:26, Gioele Barabucci wrote: installing Debian 13 testing using today's image [1] always fails at the boot loader installation stage with the error "Failed to mount /target/proc". After this message is shown, GRUB is left uninstalled and it

Bug#1040899: debian-cd: "Failed to mount /target/proc" during GRUB installation

Package: debian-cd Severity: important Hi, installing Debian 13 testing using today's image [1] always fails at the boot loader installation stage with the error "Failed to mount /target/proc". After this message is shown, GRUB is left uninstalled and it is not possible the boot the system.

Request to enable Mirror for public Use

Hi, Could you kindly review and enable these mirrors on your official site for public use? NL: https://mirror.nl.altushost.com/debian-cd/ && https://mirror.nl.altushost.com/debian SE: https://mirror.se.altushost.com/debian-cd/ && https://mirror.se.altushost.com/debian Thank you!

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

> >Speaking for myself: I installed from a live image on the release day of > >Debian > >12. > > OK, that explains it. Let's try to get this fixed before 12.1... > > I can see that there is already #1035382 open on the live side, let's> bump > the severity on that. > Aha, yes. Bug #1035382

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

Control: severity 1035382 grave On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 06:29:49PM +0200, Magnus Wallin wrote: > >Hi Magnus, and thanks for the heads-up > >[ . . . ] > >Just because the raspi-firmware package is included on the d-i >installation media, it shouldn't necessarily be installed on an

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

> Hi Magnus, and thanks for the heads-up > > [ . . . ] > > Just because the raspi-firmware package is included on the d-i > installation media, it shouldn't necessarily be installed on an amd64 > host. Or is this coming from live images? > Hi Steve! Speaking for myself: I installed from a live

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

Hi Magnus, and thanks for the heads-up On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 06:13:28PM +0200, Magnus Wallin wrote: >> Just a head's up that this is starting to affect numerous people. >> If at all possible to prioritize it would be great. >> > >Sorry: I somehow managed to not include links in my previous

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

> Just a head's up that this is starting to affect numerous people. > If at all possible to prioritize it would be great. > Sorry: I somehow managed to not include links in my previous message. Here below are examples of affected individuals and workarounds:

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:36:22PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >Package: debian-cd >Version: 3.2.0 >Severity: minor > >debian-bookworm-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso includes firmware packages for >ARM platforms: > > firmware-qcom-soc > firmware-samsung > firmware-ti-connectivity > raspi-firmware

CDImage Debian

Mirror name: ir.debian.sindad.cloud Packages archive, over HTTP:    /debian-cd Packages archive, over rsync:    debian-cd Information about the mirror site Mirrored architectures:    amd64 ,arm64 ,armel ,armhf ,i386 ,mips64el ,mipsel ,ppc64el ,s390x Name of site maintainer: Sindad LLC Public

Re: 12.1 planning

Ciao, On 6/28/23 03:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23 Sep 30 Sep (preferred) 7 Oct Thanks, 23 of September or the 7th of October for Press. 30th is unfortunately an

Upcoming stable point release (12.1)

Hi, The first point release for "bookworm" (12.1) is scheduled for Saturday, July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: 12.1 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. > Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) > 7 Oct > > Thanks, > Subject to willingness of others to

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): > > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September > > 2023. Please indicate your availability for: > > > > 23 Sep > > 30 Sep (preferred) > > 7 Oct > > I should be able to

Re: 12.1 planning

Should be able to help the 22th July too Den ons 28 juni 2023 kl 13:13 skrev Andy : > > On 28 June 2023 08:17:40 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: > >> > >> 8th

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): >> The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September >> 2023. Please indicate your availability for: >> >> 23 Sep >> 30 Sep (preferred) >> 7 Oct > >I should be able to make any

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

On 28 June 2023 09:09:42 BST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): >> The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September >> 2023. Please indicate your availability for: >> >> 23 Sep >> 30 Sep (preferred) >> 7 Oct > >I should be able to make any of those

Re: 12.1 planning

On 28 June 2023 08:17:40 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: >> >> 8th July (4) >> 15th July (5) >> 22nd July (6) > >We'll go for 12.1 only on 22nd July,

Re: 11.8/12.2 planning

Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): > The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September > 2023. Please indicate your availability for: > > 23 Sep > 30 Sep (preferred) > 7 Oct I should be able to make any of those work for the installer team, and optionally for the images team.

11.8/12.2 planning

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Subject: 12.1 planning That should, of course, be 11.8/12.2. Sorry. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R:

12.1 planning

Hi, The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23 Sep 30 Sep (preferred) 7 Oct Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: 11.8 planning

After some discusion we'll leave 11.8 until its proper cadence in September and combine it with 12.2. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC

Re: 12.1 planning

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:04:06PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: > > 8th July (4) > 15th July (5) > 22nd July (6) We'll go for 12.1 only on 22nd July, announcements to follow. -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Re: 11.8 planning

On 6/26/23 12:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi Donald, On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, Donald Norwood wrote: Hi, On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due

Re: 11.8 planning

Hi Donald, On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, Donald Norwood wrote: > Hi, > > On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four > > months, > > rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due > > somewhere in late August to

Re: 11.8 planning

Can help the 1th or 8th July the 15th i am having vacation 2023-06-19 23:02 GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wiltshire : > Hi, > > I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the > timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends, > but they could also be

Re: 12.1 planning

Can help the 8th July if help is needed, can't help the other dates however as i will be busy with vacation and GUADEC then 2023-06-19 23:04 GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wiltshire : > Hi, > > The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: > > 8th July (4) > 15th July (5) > 22nd July (6) >

Re: 11.8 planning

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 03:17:22PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, >> rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due >> somewhere in late

Re: 11.8 planning

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, > rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due > somewhere in late August to mid-September. So we could either punt 11.8 > so it aligns with

Re: 11.8 planning

Hi, On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due somewhere in late August to mid-September. So we could either punt 11.8 so it aligns with 12.2 rather than 12.1, or do

Re: 11.8 planning

On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 22:02 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's > because the > timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate > weekends, > but they could also be stretched[1] and combined. > > Two months from 29th

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >