Hello,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've contacted Debian CD Team to look at it.
What exactly do you think is wrong here Otavio?
In fact it was a misunderstand between me and Steve. I was talking
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We can't use the daily images for testing in many arches (mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ...).
Nonsense. You're failing to distinguish between daily *D-I* builds and
daily *CD* builds. Sure, the daily *D-I* builds for mips are failing, but
that has
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We can't use the daily images for testing in many arches (mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ...).
Nonsense. You're failing to distinguish between daily *D-I* builds and
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 13:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The squeeze_d-i daily CD builds are based on the version of
D-I you
uploaded, not on the failing daily D-I builds!
The daily D-I builds only affect the sid_d-i daily CD builds.
Hello Rick,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
The images with the blocking bugs has been built and are waiting for
last tests before announce.
Please look at:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've contacted Debian CD Team to look at it.
What exactly do you think is wrong here Otavio?
* netinst and businesscard images are built daily as squeeze_d-i [1]
* the mini.iso images are part of the D-I builds, not debian-cd builds [2]
* so
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've contacted Debian CD Team to look at it.
What exactly do you think is wrong here Otavio?
* netinst and businesscard images are built daily as squeeze_d-i
* so it's completely correct
7 matches
Mail list logo
