On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[ Sent to both -release and -cd; please respect the reply-to: -cd ]
Ditto.
There's been quite a lot of discussion lately about releasing sarge on
dual-layer DVD; it's clearly attractive for CD/DVD vendors to be able
to sell one disc
Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:28:23PM +, Joel Baker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:25:29AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Jigdo means that we can do this without eating terabytes of disk space
all over the world. To get the DL DVD images pressed will probably
take
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:45:31PM +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:13:14AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Yes, it should be quite easy to grab all the bits you need from the 2
smaller ISOs to make the large one, with just the filesystem headers
and directory structure
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:13:14AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 08:28:23PM +, Joel Baker wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:25:29AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Jigdo means that we can do this without eating terabytes of disk space
all over the world. To get the
Richard,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:58:55PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
8604024832 sarge-i386-1.iso
We're going to have to start trimming things if we want dual-layer
DVDs to work for the sarge release. Suggestions?
The
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Steve McIntyre wrote:
What I'd like us to do is create several image sizes for each arch:
Sounds good to me.
1 business card image (ISO, maybe jigdo too)
1 netinst image (ISO, maybe jigdo too)
Really, what good would jigdo do here? If you have such slow connection
that
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
8604024832 sarge-i386-1.iso
We're going to have to start trimming things if we want dual-layer
DVDs to work for the sarge release. Suggestions?
The following shows the kB needed (for all+i386) and names of some packages
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:11:49PM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
Richard Atterer schrieb am Dienstag, 07. September 2004 um 15:58:55 +0200:
Of course, another option is to go for dual-sided single-layer DVD (aka
DVD-10), but that loses much of the convenience for the user. Comments?
I
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[ Sent to both -release and -cd; please respect the reply-to: -cd ]
There's been quite a lot of discussion lately about releasing sarge on
dual-layer DVD; it's clearly attractive for CD/DVD vendors to be able
to sell one disc
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Maybe this has already been mentioned, but I think it's worth pointing
out that two single-sided single-layer DVDs are more convenient than
one double-sided single-layer DVD for people who have more than one
DVD drive and can therefore have both discs mounted at the same
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:11:49PM +0200, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
Richard Atterer schrieb am Dienstag, 07. September 2004 um 15:58:55 +0200:
I think dual-sided DVDs are *very* unpopular, aren't they?
AFAIK dual-sided single-layer is identical to two single-sided
single-layer disks.
Suse sells
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:04:44PM +, Joel Baker wrote:
The simple answer would be to make sure that we have a reasonable selection
of two disks (for individual burns or dual-sided single-layered press
runs), and a way to make it easy for folks wanting to burn or press
single-sided dual-layer
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:36:50PM -0300, Nelson Altimari wrote:
In any case, there should be a single-sided, double-layered image
(8.5Gb), for the user which wants a single, 'flipless' disc. Although I
also have two drives, I would stick to the double-layered image myself.
The only problem is
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:31:23PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
We're going to have to start trimming things if we want dual-layer
DVDs to work for the sarge release. Suggestions?
Already using 2xDVD testing images of
14 matches
Mail list logo
