think there is hardware out there with>> 32bit
> >> EFI and 64bit CPUs. > Correct, early MacBooks are of this type.
> I own one, a MacBook 2,1.
> Do you know whether your MacBook 2.1 supports/needs EFI secure boot?
> Currently the live-build generated image does not con
pe.
I own one, a MacBook 2,1.
Do you know whether your MacBook 2.1 supports/needs EFI secure boot?
Currently the live-build generated image does not contain a signed EFI,
but it could get one with a reasonable amount of effort.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 02 Feb 2019 23:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#821054: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #821054,
regarding debian-cd will need changes for UEFI Secure Boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Perhaps we should find time to hack at DebConf
-T
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So far as I know, no progress has been made on the above steps or any
alternate approach.
Ditto, I've not
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 23:38 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
1. Colin Watson will prepare dak changes to support upload and
subsequent signing of EFI executables. (This is an embedded, not
detached, signature.)
2. Steve Langasek will prepare and upload a package of the 'shim' EFI
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So far as I know, no progress has been made on the above steps or any
alternate approach.
Ditto, I've not seen (or done) anything about this.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2013-08-13):
Colin Watson and Stefano Rivera talked about how Ubuntu had implemented
Secure Boot and what they believed were the requirements.
Apparently, the Secure Boot spec requires each stage of the boot code
to validate signatures only until
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:30:55AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Editing of binary packages is icky, so that's not part of the plan.
Instead, after dak signs an executable, the package maintainer downloads
and copies those into a separate 'source' package, which has a trivial
debian/rules. (And
You might be interested in this meeting at DebConf. It should be
streamed (see http://blog.debconf.org/blog/debconf13/hl_dc13_video.dc)
so others can participate by IRC, though I'm not sure how well that
works for meetings.
Secure Boot for Debian Linux
today, 14:30 CST (12:30 UTC), talk room 2
Colin Watson and Stefano Rivera talked about how Ubuntu had implemented
Secure Boot and what they believed were the requirements.
Apparently, the Secure Boot spec requires each stage of the boot code to
validate signatures only until ExitBootServices() is called. (At this
point the firmware
packages when a
Secure Boot environment is detected? (or (3) something else…)
The secure boot shim is a small bootloader. It's the only part that
absolutely needs to be signed by MS, AIUI. It was designed to facilitate
distributions in our position. Signed versions are also already
available
a
Secure Boot environment is detected? (or (3) something else…)
[...]
Signing of EFI executables (aside from MS signature on shim) would be
done by dak and would require manual intervention from the FTP team.
Editing of binary packages is icky, so that's not part of the plan.
Instead, after dak
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:01:57PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the story behing the release announcement saying that
secure
boot has not yet been implemented for Wheezy?
I have been running a dual boot Wheezy/Win 8 machine for 3 weeks. It will
boot
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:01:57PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the story behing the release announcement saying that
secure
boot has not yet been implemented for Wheezy?
I have been running a dual boot Wheezy
Hi folks,
What is the story behing the release announcement saying that
secure
boot has not yet been implemented for Wheezy?
I have been running a dual boot Wheezy/Win 8 machine for 3 weeks. It will
boot the official discs.
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson
15 matches
Mail list logo
