Re: New UEFI ISO built with old xorriso

2015-01-07 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, I'll update before the next one, I promise! :-) I wonder why no firmware ever complains about the bug. Let's hope that none of them depends on GPT CRC being wrong. :)) Have a nice day :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

jessie uefi netinst build 2 test.

2015-01-07 Thread Philip Charles
Hi, This was a quick initial test which went up to partitioning the disk. Asus eeepc, i386 no problem Acer E1 531 notebook secure boot on. i386, no problem. amd64, kernel/modules mismatch. Initial boot OK. A

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20150107 hint it into testing

2015-01-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org (2015-01-07): Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: dak copy-installer 20150107 Done. Thanks, Ansgar. Release team, I've gone ahead and hinted debian-installer myself, so that Steve (cc'd through debian-cd@) can trigger a build after the 1000 britney

UEFI 32 bit on Proliant X2

2015-01-07 Thread Giorgio Pioda
Hi, I'm currently triing to install Jessie on a Proliant X2 (10-k010nz) with Atom Z3736F. Steve's image is able to boot on uefi 32 but I get stuck by the fact that I have only 1 USB port, no ethernet and wifi only network. Would be very kind if the installer either would be a full CD (or a

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:51 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:46:37AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 01:59 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: Talking about other compression schemes or providing multiple versions of the same file will just confuse users.

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 22:13 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:51:18PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:46:37AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: BTW our kernel now supports the /chosen/stdout-path property in fdt and will automatically put a console

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2015-01-07, Ian Campbell wrote: On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 08:59 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2015-01-02, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote: But I still have a question about the hd-media sd-card images --

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 16:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2015-01-02): (Do your patches end up adding the correct Built-Using on u-boot?) No, they don't, but d-i does not do that for similar components on other platforms (syslinux/isolinux/grub) as

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2015-01-05, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2015-01-02): Ok, I'll change the wording for V4. My intention was to provide a generic README that works regardless of which compression options one chooses in the makefile, so that switching from .gz to .xz would be

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 10:41 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2015-01-07, Ian Campbell wrote: And therefore aren't they more usefully built along with that iso? Otherwise how do you know how big to make the partition to contain the iso at d-i build time given the varied sizes of .iso and

Re: Providing (armhf) u-boot images together with d-i images?

2015-01-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 08:59 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2015-01-02, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote: I think the difference is one is a set of netboot images, and the other is a set of hd-media