Bug#868198: cdrom: CDROM detection fails for SATA drive in debian-installer

2017-07-12 Thread Igor Liferenko
Package: cdrom Severity: important Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, Debian installer from official testing build for 2017-07-10 from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.jigdo fails on "detect cdrom" stage. I write the image to my SATA drive

Re: Bug#867898: debian-installer-netboot-images: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 scsi modules missing. Netboot image unusable

2017-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:09:58AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:50:34AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> >>> But this package is also missing on the "release" DVDs for "amd64". >>> Nearly every other architecture has this package within an image >>> (whether "netinst" od

Re: Bug#867898: debian-installer-netboot-images: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 scsi modules missing. Netboot image unusable

2017-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:50:34AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Paschedag, Robert (2017-07-12): >> thank you for your hints on the packages, that *are* available for >> amd64. The package we need is >> >> scsi-modules-4.9.0-3-amd64-di_4.9.30-2_amd64.udeb >> >> this one contains the needed modu

Re: Bug#867898: debian-installer-netboot-images: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 scsi modules missing. Netboot image unusable

2017-07-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Paschedag, Robert (2017-07-12): > thank you for your hints on the packages, that *are* available for > amd64. The package we need is > > scsi-modules-4.9.0-3-amd64-di_4.9.30-2_amd64.udeb > > this one contains the needed modules for the LSI logic controller (and > several other) > > ... > .

Re: Going off-line in >~=90 days: Re: I have available missing older files for Debian archive (debian-30r0-i386 verified; also unverified: debian-21r0-i386-binary-1)

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Paoli
P.S. You'll need ftp://ftp.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/pub/_Linux/Debian/dists/Debian3.0r0/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso also for other .deb files on Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r0 "Woody" - Official i386 Binary-1 (20020718) As I'd also earlier thinned from my hosting, files that were redundant with those

Re: Going off-line in >~=90 days: Re: I have available missing older files for Debian archive (debian-30r0-i386 verified; also unverified: debian-21r0-i386-binary-1)

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Paoli
Sounds good - thanks for attending to this! Non-US should likely still be able to get that same place I did: ftp://ftp.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/pub/_Linux/Debian/dists/Debian3.0r0/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso Contents thereof will also cover some of the files I'm no longer hosting on-line ... a

Re: discrepancy between checksum files and downloadable iso files

2017-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:30:12PM +0200, Julius Dittmar wrote: >Hi, > >when downloading the checksums from > >https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/ >or >https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/iso-dvd/ > >they claim 14 DVDs to be involved. But only 3 iso files are o

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-12 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 12/07/2017, Fernando Toledo wrote: > El 26/06/17 a las 11:08, Steve McIntyre escribió: >> [ Note the cross-posting... ] >> >> Hey folks, >> > > Our Use-case: > > We develop a derivated distro from Debian called Huayra GNU/Linux, this > is for educational program of government in A

discrepancy between checksum files and downloadable iso files

2017-07-12 Thread Julius Dittmar
Hi, when downloading the checksums from https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/ or https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/iso-dvd/ they claim 14 DVDs to be involved. But only 3 iso files are offered. What's the reason for the discrepancy? Thanks in advance, Juliu

Re: IMPORTANT: Do live Debian images have a future?

2017-07-12 Thread Fernando Toledo
El 26/06/17 a las 11:08, Steve McIntyre escribió: > [ Note the cross-posting... ] > > Hey folks, > Our Use-case: We develop a derivated distro from Debian called Huayra GNU/Linux, this is for educational program of government in Argentina. This big program ship around 5 millons of netbooks to h

Re: Going off-line in >~=90 days: Re: I have available missing older files for Debian archive (debian-30r0-i386 verified; also unverified: debian-21r0-i386-binary-1)

2017-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Michael! On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:32:44AM -0700, Michael Paoli wrote: >Have generally made these available for over 2 years now. >In bit over 90 days from now I'll remove them from being on-line. >Gone will be [www.]old-debian.mpaoli.net >and from under that, the files that have been (and I p

Going off-line in >~=90 days: Re: I have available missing older files for Debian archive (debian-30r0-i386 verified; also unverified: debian-21r0-i386-binary-1)

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Paoli
Have generally made these available for over 2 years now. In bit over 90 days from now I'll remove them from being on-line. Gone will be [www.]old-debian.mpaoli.net and from under that, the files that have been (and I presume likely still are?) missing from the Debian archive needed to assemble th