Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Let's go with "-jigdo-checksum-algorithm" to keep the separation?
The user is king.
Other mail:
I proposed to keep versioning and SONAME at 1
> > LIBJTE1 {
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Surely that works for upwards compatibility, but won't stop somebody
> from building
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:04:31AM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>SONAME comes from libjte/configure.ac. Dunno from where libburn got the
>slightly braindamaged way to compose it. From there it spread over the
>other libraries. libjte is its youngest victim. Shrug.
Right.
>The upstream
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:37:29PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>while exploring the need for adaptions in the build system of libsofs,
>i wonder whether it is really necessary to create LIBJTE2 in libjte.ver.
>Adding new functions is upward compatible.
>In my libraries i add them to the
[ Arg, sorry to keep you waiting for responses. Really busy
week... :-/ ]
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:10:04PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i wrote:
>> > libjte_set_checksum_algorithm() became necessary
>
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> ACK. I'd not thought that through fully myself here, but
4 matches
Mail list logo
