Re: Planning for 12.6
Hi, On 2/12/24 17:28, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: >> >> 7 April >> 13 April >> 20 April > > Any of those should work for me, assuming (re Adam) that you mean 6 > April and not 7 April. > Same for Publicity, all dates are good to go. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_0xE5EC4AC9BD627B05.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9
Sorry, super late on this one. I withdraw my 'vote' and will acquiesce to which ever date the group selects. I do like the 17th though. Original Message Subject: Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9 From: Luna Jernberg To: Cyril Brulebois , Luna Jernberg Cc: Steve McIntyre , Jonathan Wiltshire , debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, ftpmas...@debian.org, pr...@debian.org, debian-cd@lists.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org, webmas...@debian.org, jcris...@debian.org Date: 1/4/2024 > Hey! > > 10th or 17th works for me the 17th the best > > Den tors 28 dec. 2023 kl 03:41 skrev Cyril Brulebois : >> >> Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26): >>> Any of those *should* be OK for me. >> >> Ditto. >> >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> >> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: Planning for 12.3
Hi, Original Message Subject: Re: Planning for 12.3 From: Andy To: debian-cd@lists.debian.org, Jonathan Wiltshire , debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Cc: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org, pr...@debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org, webmas...@debian.org, jcris...@debian.org, k...@debian.org Date: 10/8/2023 On 7 October 2023 21:59:53 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: How about: 4th December (better for cadence) 11th December (more likely suitable in practice) Erm, astute readers will realise the 4th and 11th are Saturdays in November, not December. The correct proposals should be: 2nd December (better for candence, no-go for me) 9th December (more likely suitable in practice) Thanks, Hi all. I can do both weekends, but unfortunately Isy will be unavailable for either date as she will be doing her mock exams. Given Isy's exams however, it will not be possible to host the images team in Cottenham either date, sorry. All the best /Andy Press can do both weekends, will Andy's image host affect new dates proposed? -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.8/12.2 planning
On 7/24/23 14:25, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: I think I confused matters with my messy thread; let's start again. I originally suggested: Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-06-28): The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23 Sep 30 Sep (preferred) 7 Oct Let's say 30 Sep is still preferred, 7th Oct or at a stretch 14th Oct are options. Please indicate your availability for those three. Thanks, Publicity/Press: 23 Sep 7 Oct 14 Oct Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 12.1 planning
Ciao, On 6/28/23 03:21, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, The proper cadence for 11.8 and 12.2 is the weekend of 30th September 2023. Please indicate your availability for: 23 Sep 30 Sep (preferred) 7 Oct Thanks, 23 of September or the 7th of October for Press. 30th is unfortunately an impossible date on my end. As an aside, we have a few things going on right now and the team is re-organizing. The further back we can push whilst we train and bring others up to speed with temporary access works for us and for the project. Apologies. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.8 planning
On 6/26/23 12:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi Donald, On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, Donald Norwood wrote: Hi, On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due somewhere in late August to mid-September. So we could either punt 11.8 so it aligns with 12.2 rather than 12.1, or do 11.8 together with 12.1 and then align 11.9 with 12.3. ... The 1st would mean freezing this coming weekend, which is very tight. As per the 12.1 mail, either the 8th or 15th would work for me, with a preference for the latter. Given the explanation above though, I think the 22nd would be fine for 11.8 as well. I think pushing everything forward at this time would be advisable as several people have indicated that they need a breather. A slight delay may be ideal. I'm assuming you mean what at least in en_GB is normally referred to as "pushing things back" - i.e. making things later than suggested. Did you just mean that we should opt for the later of the dates suggested (July 22nd), or did you have something else in mind? Sorry for the block quote: Phrasal verbs can be so very confusing. Yes you are correct. I suggest moving the dates into the future to allow for everyone to relax a bit and be in tune for the next releases. I believe the 22nd would be best, unless others have differing input to the date selection. *Push or pull? I asked a colleague and they thought push forward would be to advance toward/through the difficulty, and pull forward would be to move something closer. I asked another and they expressed a reversal of the terms in the contrary. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.8 planning
Hi, On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four months, rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due somewhere in late August to mid-September. So we could either punt 11.8 so it aligns with 12.2 rather than 12.1, or do 11.8 together with 12.1 and then align 11.9 with 12.3. ... The 1st would mean freezing this coming weekend, which is very tight. As per the 12.1 mail, either the 8th or 15th would work for me, with a preference for the latter. Given the explanation above though, I think the 22nd would be fine for 11.8 as well. I think pushing everything forward at this time would be advisable as several people have indicated that they need a breather. A slight delay may be ideal. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.8 planning
Hi, On 6/19/23 17:02, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends, but they could also be stretched[1] and combined. Two months from 29th April is around the 1st July, so I propose: 1st July 8th July 15th July at a push 1: a shame that joke hasn't worked for some years now The joke made me chortle. :) I got the emails out of order. 8th and 15th for Press. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 12.1 planning
Hi On 6/19/23 17:04, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like: 8th July (4) 15th July (5) 22nd July (6) If the 8th is doable Press can do it and the 15th, would prefer the 15th or 22nd. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.7 planning + bookworm planning
Hi, On 4/20/23 15:15, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 08:20:51PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi all, TL;DR: ftp & press input for June needed. On 20-04-2023 18:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The 13th does seem a bit close now, without having announced. After some consideration today, and the vibe felt in this discussion, let's not rush this, so let's skip May 13 (also giving Press some time, see below). One other thing of note is that, unless I've missed some mail, there's no press / publicity team member confirmed as available, which is really a requirement. Jonathan (DPL) mentioned earlier: """ Press team is in some slight limbo at the moment, I hope to help fix that after the DPL election is over, in the mean time, it might be a good idea not to block on them. """ If press is "really a requirement", we'll have to wait until this is settled. >From the CD side we know that with May 13 out, the rest of May is also out. So we're looking for a date in June. For June, starting with 10, we have: kibi - 10, 17, 24d-i Luna - 10, 17, 24CD testing elbrus- 10, 24release team adsb - 10, 17, 24release team Sledge - 10, 17, 24images team June 10 and 17 are workable. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: 11.7 planning
29th is workable. On 3/15/23 18:36, Andy wrote: On 15 March 2023 20:33:47 GMT, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (probably too soon), 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th. Thanks, I can do 15th, 22nd or 29th Isy is only available from the 29th (mocks) Best wishes /Andy -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: 11.4 planning
Hi Everyone!
Following on Laura, we can do both dates though the 9th would be preferable as
the July 2nd weekend falls on a Holiday week which is not ideal for my timezone.
We can cover regardless, but the 9th is ideal .
On 6/20/22 10:09, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure about Donald's preferences but I could do both dates, so count
with press/webmaster in any case.
Kind regards
El 17 de junio de 2022 21:31:23 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt"
escribió:
Hi,
We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for
bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf}
period. I think the possible dates that make sense are:
- July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it)
- July 9th
I think there's already a couple of things pending on KiBi's review
list; I'll try and flag up any others as soon as I can.
Thanks,
Adam
--
Be well,
-Donald
--
-
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174
⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: 11.3 and 10.12 planning
Hi Everyone, On 3/8/22 12:15, Andy Simpkins wrote: Hi Everyone, I can do the 26th March or the 9th of April. For Publicity/Press: March 26th and April 9th ideal. I can try to accommodate April 2nd but it would be spotty. -- Be well, -Donald -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date
Hi! On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I >>> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with >>> crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart from this issue (and what >>> it means for solving the debian-installer blocking issues in time), I'm >>> not aware of other blocking issues, so let's hope the teams involved can >>> recover in time. >> >> Albeit there is some progress, we think it better for the people >> involved to now say that we will *not* release on July 31. >> >> Unfortunately, that means that we have to start looking for a new date >> again. Assuming what we'll learn in the upcoming week or two is good, I >> propose to already start the list below with two weeks after the >> previous date. Upcoming time is around DebConf, I can imagine it could >> even be an advantage, especially as that's on-line, let's see. >> >> 14 August (day before DebCamp) Doable. > > Works for me for images team > >> 21 August (last day of DebCamp) >> RT: elbrus > > Awkward - wife has plans for us that evening. Half of the press team is available this day so it is not ideal. > >> 28 August (DebConf) >> RT: elbrus > > Debian UK BBQ, argh > >> 4 September >> RT: elbrus Labor day weekend in the U.S. Not a good weekend. > > Works fine for me > >> 11 September: >> RT: elbrus > > That's the week of my wedding anniversary, I'll be on VAC. Happy Anniversary! Could we put forth September 18th? We are good for that day without any issues. > -- -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date
On 4/23/21 5:00 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > I'm trusting the release team to block until d-i is ready, from what I > understand the date that they're trying to find in May is just a > tentative date. Would it also make sense to keep another tentative date > for June as a back-up? (I'm thinking that it might make it easier to > plan now than to scramble again in May, but if you feel different then > that's fine too). Indeed, from this and the last few posts in the discussion it reads that perhaps June is the better option for the 'timed' ready when ready release date. I think it would allow for extra care to be given in the areas needed and would as Paul suggested allow the larger community to pull together to help resolve some of the issues. I'd suggest to strike the May 1, 8, and 15th dates and move to: May 22 May 29 Jun 05 Jun 12 Jun 19 Separately, if there is an area where a non-programmer-coder (NPC, haha) can assist perhaps with a set of steps that I can reproduce on my equipment here, please point me to it and I'll chip in. Be well, -Donald -- -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date
Hello, everyone On 4/9/21 2:47 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team, > > The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good. > Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some > love, but the state is much better than we remembered from the same time > in buster. > Great job all around, very exciting. > Last time in the buster release cycle, it took quite a while to pick a > release date once it was clear that buster could get released. As we > believe that shorter freeze period are better for the spirit of > contributors to Debian, we'd like to avoid such an unnecessary delay > again, and we'd want to pick a tentative release date. We call it > tentative, because it would be the date where we do the bullseye release > assuming that the identified issues are resolved by then and that we > don't find new blocking issues between now and two weeks before that > proposed date. So, the date would not be the set-in-stone release date, > but obviously it would become more solid as we get near it. > > We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the > following work for you and do you have any preference? > - May 1 > - May 8 > - May 15 > - May 22 > - May 29 Press can do May 1, 8, or 22. Looking forward already! -Donald -- -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 10.9 planning
Ciao, March 27th and April 10th work for the publicity component. On 3/15/21 8:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point > release. > > Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for > the following: > > - March 27th > - April 3rd > - April 10th > > I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish > reasons. :-) > > Regards, > > Adam > Be Well, -Donald -- -- - ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 10.7 planning
Hi Everyone! On 10/30/20 3:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > In an attempt to be slightly more efficient than usual at planning a > point release... it's about a month since 10.6, so let's start looking > at dates for 10.7. > > Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for > the following: > > - November 21st > - November 28th > - December 5th > All dates are fine with Publicity, with a very slight preference for the 28th. -- -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05
Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning
Hi, On 7/18/20 5:44 PM, Andy Simpkins wrote: > > > On 18 July 2020 22:39:05 BST, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:12:41PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 12:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Argh, massive apologies... > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:38:14AM +0200, Laura Arjona > Reina wrote: > > El 15/6/20 a las 18:44, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > > - July 18/19 > > > Massive apologies for dropping a spanner in the works, but > something major has come up. I won't be able to do *all* > of that > weekend after all. As Stretch EOL is already a thing, > can I suggest > that we keep that to plan and push back the Buster 10.5 > release a > little? > > Sorry. :-/ > > > Thanks for letting us know. :-( > > I'll drop a note to the lists, and we can look at getting a > new date > organised. > > > Now that stretch EoL is (more or less) out of the way, it would > be good > to get 10.5 done as soon as we sensibly can, so as not to slip > too far > off schedule. > > Next weekend is probably a little too soon - I'd at least like > to not > jump straight back into freezing - but how about one of: > > - August 1st/2nd > - August 8th/9th > > > Either is possible for me, with a preference for the first. Let's not > delay too long if possible. > > Cheers, > > Steve > > > -- > I am good for either weekend. > Given a preferance i would prefer the 1st. > > Cheers > /Andy August 1/2nd is good on the publicity side. 8/9 can work if needed. -- -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10
Hi, On 7/14/19 2:35 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > So, the first point release for buster would normally be about a month > after release, or something like 3rd August. But I'm aware that already > doesn't work for some people, so we might have to get a bit creative with > it. > > Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - August 3rd Slightly workable for the 3rd. > - August 10th > - August 17th > Vacations. > and failing those, let's look ahead as far as: > > - August 24th > - Auguest 31st > - September 7th September 7th works best for Press as we will both be around. > > We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit in some time - would the same > day or adjacent weekends be preferable? > > Thanks, > > -- > Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org > Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw > > 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 > -- -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Scheduling 9.9
On 2/20/19 8:05 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Steve McIntyre (2019-02-20): >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:28:05PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please indicate your availablility out of: >>> >>> - April 13 >>> - April 20 (Easter weekend) >> >> I'm away on holiday for both of these, I'm afraid, and so is chief CD >> tester Andy. >> >>> - April 27 >> >> But this works. > > All dates should be OK for d-i preparations on my side. Publicity can do the 27th. -- -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Scheduling 9.7
On 1/19/19 5:28 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 06:44:56PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 9.7 is a bit overdue already (current events being a bit of a time-sink). >> >> Please indicate your availablility out of: >> >> - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM) > > Quite. > >> - Feb 9 >> - Feb 16 > > Both of those currently look free for me. > Press can do either the 9th or the 16th, however, we do prefer the 16th. :) -- -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Donald Norwood ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ B7A1 5F45 5B28 7F38 4174 ⠈⠳⣄ D5E9 E5EC 4AC9 BD62 7B05 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 8.6 planning
Publicity team can do any of the September dates. September 5th is on the tail end of a long Holiday weekend in the US. On 08/07/2016 06:10 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:04:44PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It's time for another Jessie point release; as wheezy's EOL, we don't >> have to worry about trying to fit two in at the same time. Some possible >> dates: >> >> August 20th/21st - doesn't work for me >> >> August 27th/28th - public holiday weekend in the UK; doesn't work for me > > Both those weekends don't work for me either, for the same reasons as > you. :-) > >> September 3rd/4th >> >> September 10th/11th >> >> September 17th/18th > > But all three of those work fine for me. > -- --Donald Norwood www.debian.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning
On 02/21/2016 08:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing >> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD >> team seem happy to try it again. >> >> Some suggested dates: >> >> March 12th / 13th >> March 19th / 20th >> March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least the UK >> April 2nd / 3rd March 12/13 is no good (Steve) and March 26/27 is Easter holiday as well in the US. Although the publicity team is flexible on the date ranges, April 2/3 seem to be the better of the date ranges as the delay would give Ben time to push the kernel updates. Best regards, Donald Norwood signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 8.3 planning
On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday >> period coming up, getting one done in December looks like a bit of a >> push. >> >> On that basis, looking at January we have: >> >> 2nd/3rd - depends how much people are still suffering. :-) > No chance for me that weekend - I've got plans already. > >> 9th/10th >> 16th/17th >> 23rd/24th - likely to be bad for me > All of these look OK so far. > Press can do 16/17 or 23/24. -Donald signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
