document various download options/locations for CD images

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all

I have committed the patch in former comment:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=145;filename=patch1_607193.diff;att=1;bug=607193

I've been exploring the website organization in order to gather all the
pages where we should link to that warning, and frankly, I see *lots* of
pages with links to images, and I'm not sure if we want to include
links to the unofficial images in each individual place:

https://www.debian.org/distrib/
https://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst
https://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/
https://www.debian.org/CD/torrent-cd/
https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
https://www.debian.org/CD/live/
https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

And, on the other side, I see that there are at least two entities
related to images including nonfree firmware:

1.- In webwml/english/template/debian/release_images.wml

# multi-arch cannot be linked as is, as we don't know which archs it
include (used in the filename)
define-tag small-non-free-cd-images
images-list
url=http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/current-nonfree-cd-release-dirname//@ARCH@/iso-cd/firmware-current-nonfree-cd-release-filename/-@a...@-netinst.iso
arch=amd64 i386 powerpc /
/define-tag


2.- In webwml/english/template/debian/release_info.wml

define-tag
current-nonfree-cd-release-dirnamecurrent-cd-release//define-tag
define-tag
current-nonfree-cd-release-filenamecurrent-nonfree-cd-release-dirname//define-tag

But only one of them is showed in
https://www.debian.org/releases/[squeeze|wheezy|jessie]/debian-installer/

So, frankly, I'm not sure how to resume the work on this bug.

My proposal would be to add a new page unofficial with links to all
the unofficial images for each release

https://www.debian.org/releases/[squeeze|wheezy|jessie]/debian-installer/unofficial

And ideally, define tags for each group of images (if the two above tags
don't include all of them).

I suppose the whole CD and distrib sections need a complete
rewriting/merging in order to reduce the places where link to images are
showed, to avoid duplicity. And my proposal does not help on that, either...

CC'ing debian-cd and debian-boot.

I'm willing to work in this bug (as well as in the distrib/CD merging).
I can prepare patches, commit them when other people ACK, and track this
bug until it gets fixed. But I would need directions (do we want a
single place with all the images? if not, how to split trying to avoid
duplicity?

Regards

-- 
Laura Arjona
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/553f8025.6040...@larjona.net

Re: 8.8 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi

El 14/03/17 a las 12:00, Julien Cristau escribió:
> It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release.  Here
> are some dates, please let us know which ones would work.
> 
> * April 8-9
> * April 15-16

Not sure, but could be

> * April 22-23
> * April 29-30
> * May 6-7

Those, at least two people from publicity are available.

> 
> I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway.
> 
> Cheers,
> Julien
> 

Cheers

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Fwd: DVD multi-arch

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi
We received the mail below at press@ and I'm not sure if we are still 
providing DVD multiarch images or only the multiarch CD netinst.


Can anybody of the CD team answer to Luc?

Thanks, and thanks for your hard work!

Best regards

--
Laura Arjona
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona


 Mensaje reenviado 
Asunto: DVD multi-arch
Fecha: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:39:41 +0200
De: Luc Novales 
Para: pr...@debian.org

Hi,
Debian 9 is now stable. Very good job !!

I'm used to download multi-arch DVD to install some computers 32 bits or 
64 bits, downloading fewer packages during install.

Last image isn't present on server, only rc5 installer can be downloaded.

Is there some reason to remove this image. Should I waiting for this 
official installer version, or rc5 will be the only version available ?


Thanks,
Luc Novales.

Re: Scheduling 9.2

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello

El 27/08/17 a las 17:48, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two month cycle we're aiming for around
> 23rd September. How about one of:
> 
> 23rd/24th September
> 30th Septmber/1st October
> 
> [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ]
> 
> After discussion with Adam and Steve, we felt it made sense to work on 2
> months for stable and 4 months for oldstable; that way there isn't a month
> 3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an
> oldstable.
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Please choose the date that suits better and at least one member of
publicity team will be around for the announcement.

Cheers
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 9.3

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all

El 15/11/17 a las 19:30, Steve McIntyre escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 05:00:16PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>> On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this
>>> happily
>>> makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the
>>> festive
>>> season).
>>>
>>> Accordingly I'm looking at one of:
>> [...]
>>> 2nd December
>>> 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending
>>>   the cycle)
>>

Publicity team is available both weekends.
Cheers

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello

El 14/05/18 a las 19:26, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> According to my records main security support for Jessie can end any time
> after 17th June. 
> 
> So to the security team: do you have a date in mind?
> 
> I also presume that LTS will take over the existing security suites as
> before. [1] lists the current delta between security and o-p-u-new which
> would ideally be as short as possible before the EOL date.
> 
> For everyone else, assuming it'll be soon after that date please
> indicate your availability from:
> 
>  - 23rd Jun
Publicity available

>  - (30th Jun I already know is impossible, for the sake of completeness)
Publicity we can't

>  - 7th July
> 
Publicity available.

> or adjacent Sundays.
> 
Sundays we are available, with some difficulty if we decide 1 July, but do-able.

Thanks
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello
Sorry for the delay in answering

El 14/05/18 a las 19:19, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> We're due a point release any day now. Please indicate your availablility
> out of:
> 
>  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big ask)
>  - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM)
>  - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be
>helped)

We (publicity) are available any of the above weekends.

Thanks
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[Laura Arjona Reina]

El 12 de junio de 2018 13:44:52 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>On 2018-06-08 18:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> [Cc += debian-kernel]
>> 
>> On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>[...]
>> We're past any of the above by now, and while looking through the
>to-do
>> list for the final jessie point release, I noticed that we currently
>> have some packages in opu with versions higher than stable.
>> 
>> We can either accept the packages and put up with the situation for a
>> short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would
>> likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next
>weekend.
>> How do people feel about that?
>
>After discussions on IRC, it appears unlikely that the currently WIP 
>kernel update will be ready in sufficient time to be happy with it on 
>all architectures.
>
>So the possible options are:
>
>- go ahead with freezing 9.5 this weekend, and hope the kernel's ready 
>in time
>- go ahead with freezing 9.5 this weekend, and update the kernel via 
>stable-updates later
>- just do 8.11 this weekend, accept the version skew and get 9.5 
>released as soon as we can
>
>To be entirely honest, I'm not that comfortable with announcing a
>freeze 
>this close to the actual date. In terms of packages with version skew, 
>we have:
>
>- packages from the security archive, where users upgrading should 
>already have the jessie-security package installed in any case
>- intel-microcode, src:patch and clamav, where it looks like the jessie
>
>package should work on stretch without issues
>- tzdata, which is already available from stretch-updates.
>
>Given all of the above, I think the sanest option is to concentrate on 
>getting 8.11 done and jessie off our radar and then get 9.5 sorted.
>
>For suggested dates for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, Debcamp
>
>starts on July 21st and then Debconf on the 28th. So that leaves us 
>with:
>
>- July 7th

This we (publicity) can, and prefer it.

>- July 14th

This, could be possible, but only one of us is available.

Cheers
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: Scheduling 9.5

[Laura Arjona Reina]

El 8 de junio de 2018 19:51:18 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>[Cc += debian-kernel]
>
>On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 12:04 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> >  - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a
>> > big
>> >  ask)
>> 
>> No.
>> 
>> >  - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM)
>> 
>> Possible.
>> 
>> >  - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that
>> > can't be
>> >    helped)
>> 
>> Possible.
>
>We're past any of the above by now, and while looking through the to-do
>
>list for the final jessie point release, I noticed that we currently
>have some packages in opu with versions higher than stable.
>
>We can either accept the packages and put up with the situation for a
>short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would
>likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next weekend.
>How do people feel about that?
>

Ok for publicity.

Cheers

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: Scheduling 9.4

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi
sorry for the delay answering

El 14/02/18 a las 23:26, Joerg Jaspert escribió:
> On 14944 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
>> we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4.
>> Can you please let us know your availability on the following:
>> - March 3
>> - March 10
> 
> Can do.
Publicity team is also available March 3 and 10.
> 
>> - March 17
> 
> Not very good

This we could make it too.

Cheers
> 
>> - March 24
>> - March 31
> 
> No way.
> 

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 9.6

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi

El 9/10/18 a las 9:07, Cyril Brulebois escribió:

Hi,

Adam D. Barratt  (2018-10-06):

That didn't work out so well in the end, and in the meantime we rather let
the ball drop. :-(

In the interests of getting things moving, some more current
suggestions:

- October 20th (means freezing next weekend)
- October 27th
- November 3rd
- November 10th


All of these look good to me. The first one is a bit close (esp. with my
backlog, as you pointed out a few days ago), but that should be doable.



All of them ok for press/publicity too.

Cheers

--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Scheduling 10.2

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all

Sorry for the late reply

El 21/10/19 a las 21:26, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> It's (really past) time to consider a date for the second buster point
> release.
> 
> I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would
> be available for.
> 
> - November 2nd
>   - I'm not available; also means that the freeze would have to be this
> coming weekend
> - November 9th
> - November 16th
> - November 23rd
> - November 30th
>   - a little late, and I'm not available

Any weekend of November (except the 2nd) works for publicity.
Kind regards,
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Planning 10.3 and 9.12

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all

Sorry for the late reply.

El 6/1/20 a las 22:42, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
> for buster and stretch.
> 
> I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would
> be available for.
> 
> - January 25th
> - February 1st
> - February 8th
> - February 15th
> 

Any weekend of those should be fine for publicity/website.
Kind regards,
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: 10.4 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all


El 6 de abril de 2020 13:16:05 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi folks,
>
>I realise things are a little unusual right now, but it's about time
>that we started looking at dates for 10.4.
>
>I guess the biggest impact of current circumstances on the process is
>likely to be around image testing, as there won't be a bunch of people
>with local access to Steve's mirror.
>
>I've listed some potential dates below; as usual, please indicate which
>you would be available for.
>
>- April 25th
>- May 2nd
>- May 9th
>

Any of those works for us (press/publicity/website).
Take care, stay safe,

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 10.6 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi all

El 9 de septiembre de 2020 20:24:06 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi all,
>
>We're slightly off our previous schedule because of delaying 10.5, but
>we should really get on with arranging 10.6.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- September 26/27
>- October 3/4
>

Both weekends work for publicity/website.
Cheers

>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi

El 15/6/20 a las 18:44, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> stretch transitions from oldstable-with-security-support to LTS support
> on Saturday July 4th. As usual, we should aim for the final point
> release to be soon after that, most likely pulling in any remaining
> updates from security.d.o that are still in oldstable-new.
> 
> I think Saturday July 11th makes most sense (so freezing opu during the
> transition weekend), but we could potentially stretch (no pun intended)
> slightly further if need be.
> 
> We also need to look at the next buster point release in a similar
> timeframe. Can anyone see a reason not to do the two at the same time,
> as usual?
> 
> To get the ball rolling, please could you confirm your availability
> for:
> 
> - July 11/12
> - July 18/19
> 
Sorry for the late reply.
We had talk about this but forgot to send the mail.
Any of the proposed dates is workable for press/website.

Apologies again for the delay.
Kind regards,
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: 10.8 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi

El 16 de enero de 2021 15:38:13 CET, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi,
>
>It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a
>bit tight)
>- February 6th
>
>My personal preference would be the 6th.
>
Both are fine for me (press/website).

Kind regards,
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 10.9 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi!

El 15 de marzo de 2021 13:33:15 CET, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi,
>
>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point
>release.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- March 27th
>- April 3rd
>- April 10th
>

All those dates work for publicity team.

Kind regards,

>I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
>reasons. :-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Adam
>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Sorry for the delay

El 6 de septiembre de 2021 13:58:14 CEST, Cyril Brulebois  
escribió:
>Hi Adam,
>
>Adam D. Barratt  (2021-09-06):
>> We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the
>> bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted.
>> 
>> Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at
>> 2- and 4-month cadences) while both are supported. That would still be
>> my preference, but I understand that not everyone on the Images side
>> is so keen on the idea. Open questions in addition to dates are
>> therefore whether we should do 10.11 and 11.1 on the same day and, if
>> not, how close together they should be.
>> 
>> A few suggested dates to get things going:
>> 
>> September 18th - not great; means freezing this coming weekend
>> September 25th - not great; I'm away during most of the week
>> beforehand, so will be unlikely to be able to deal with any issues,
>> make sure everything's ready, etc.
>> October 2nd - OK for me
>> October 9th - OK for me
>> October 16th - OK for me
>
>Regarding d-i preps, I should be able to accomodate anything that gets
>picked up.
>
Same for publicity/website, we can do on any date and we have no particular 
preference on 10+11 together or in separate weekends.

Kind regards

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.2 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi 

El 25 de noviembre de 2021 17:47:41 CET, Mark Hymers  escribió:
>On Tue, 23, Nov, 2021 at 08:12:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus..
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It's (a little past) time that we organised the next point release. As
>> an "every other" release, this time will only be for stable.
>> 
>> Any of the first three weekends of December would work for me, although
>> the 4th is my least preferred as it means freezing over the coming
>> weekend and I'm not sure if I'll have time to do a fair job of dealing
>> with things before that.
>> 
>> tl;dr, suggested dates:
>> 
>> December 4th [least preferable for me]
>> December 11th
>> December 18th
>
>I can do the 11th or 18th.
>
>Mark
>
Fpr press/website, I'm available the 11th and the 18th.

Kind regards
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: Releasing bullseye on 14 August 2021 [Was Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date]

[Laura Arjona Reina]

 Hi all
I'm also available, adding myself below:

El 22 de julio de 2021 21:18:43 CEST, Paul Gevers  escribió:
>Hi all,
>
>Thanks to the reply from Ansgar, we now have a release date for
>bullseye: 14 August. For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a
>tentative date anymore. I'll do a proper announcement later today or
>tomorrow evening.
>
>14 August (day before DebCamp)
>   RT: Adam
>   Image: Steve, Andy
Press: Donald, Laura
>   FTP: Ansgar
>
>Paul
>
Thanks everybody!
Kind regards
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.4 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hi
I'm not sure about Donald's preferences but I could do both dates, so count 
with press/webmaster in any case.

Kind regards

El 17 de junio de 2022 21:31:23 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi,
>
>We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for
>bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf}
>period. I think the possible dates that make sense are:
>
>- July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it)
>- July 9th
>
>I think there's already a couple of things pending on KiBi's review
>list; I'll try and flag up any others as soon as I can.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.6 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello all

El 17 de noviembre de 2022 22:33:33 CET, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 escribió:
>Hi,
>
>We've managed to slip behind on getting a bullseye point release
>sorted, again. :-( I realise we're heading towards the holidays at a
>surprising rate of knots, but hopefully we can find a generally
>agreeable date.
>
>Please could you indicate your availability and preferences between:
>
>- December 3rd
>- December 10th
>- December 17th
>

Any of those works for publicity/website.

Kind regards

>At this point, the 10th is probably my preference, as I'm likely to be
>busy with work stuff at the tail end of November.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.7 planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello

El 16 de marzo de 2023 13:21:52 CET, Donald Norwood  
escribió:
>29th is workable.
>

I can the 15th and 22nd of April.
For now I cannot say anything about my availability for May (bookworm release).

Kind regards

>On 3/15/23 18:36, Andy wrote:
>> On 15 March 2023 20:33:47 GMT, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included
>>> before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so
>>> how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (probably too
>>> soon), 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I can do 15th, 22nd or 29th
>> Isy is only available from the 29th (mocks)
>> 
>> Best wishes
>> /Andy
>

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail

Re: 11.7 planning + bookworm planning

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello all

El 23/3/23 a las 13:31, Paul Gevers escribió:

Hi,

With the point release scheduled for April 29th, it's probably good to 
have at least one weekend in between, or do people not mind doing two 
weekends in a row?


On 17-03-2023 15:59, Steve McIntyre wrote:

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:

So, shall we add availability for May too? 6th, 13th, 20th (Ascension
weekend), and 27th (coincides with DebianReunionHamburg)?


I could do the 6th and 13th, but I'm away on vacation 20th and 27th
(and 3rd June).


If I did the bookkeeping correctly, the missing necessary teams are 
press and release team, as I now have:

kibi  - 6, 13, 20, 27   d-i
mhy   - 6, 13, 20, 27   ftp
Sledge    - 6, 13   CD
Luna  - 6, 20   CD testing

I can help 6 (probably), 13 and 27, but I don't have the signing key and 
I haven't witnessed all details from our side so I'm not comfortable 
doing it alone even if I could get my hands on the key.


elbrus    -    13, 27  release team

Paul


I have no spoons to do/coordinate the work that the release needs in the 
publicity side, so better that other express their availability.

If situation changes, I'll write again.

Thanks

--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello
for webmasters the status remains the same as last time, so we have no tasks to 
do in point releases.

Kind regards

El 12 de enero de 2024 13:12:31 CET, Mark Hymers  escribió:
>On Tue, 19, Dec, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus..
>> It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) and
>> 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye before LTS.
>> 
>> Please indicate availability for:
>> 
>>   Saturday  3rd February (preferred for cadence)
>>   Saturday 10th February
>>   Saturday 17th February
>
>Sorry for the delay.  I can currently do any of those for ftp.
>
>Mark
>
>
>-- 
>Mark Hymers 

Re: Planning for 12.3

[Laura Arjona Reina]

Hello

El 7/10/23 a las 22:59, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió:

On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

How about:
   4th December (better for cadence)
  11th December (more likely suitable in practice)

Erm, astute readers will realise the 4th and 11th are Saturdays in
November, not December. The correct proposals should be:

  2nd December (better for candence, no-go for me)
  9th December (more likely suitable in practice)


I am available any of those days, but I think for now there's no task 
for webmasters in point releases.


Donald (as press delegate) didn't accept my proposal in 
https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2023/07/msg00014.html saying that 
the publicity team would care about all those tasks (I asked him to 
reply to my message publicly but it didn't happen).


It seems indeed they handled the web part the last point releases, so I 
assumed everybody is ok with the current status. Hence my no-reply about 
12.3 until now.


If the DPL or delegated people prefer otherwise (i.e. that the web team 
to care about any part of the workflow), please state it in public and 
I'll do my best.


Kind regards,

--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona